Preattentive memory-based comparison of sound intensity

Audiology and Neuro-Otology

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 338-346

  Jacobsen, Thomas ^a   Horenkamp, Thorsten ^a   Schröger, Erich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory sensory memory; Change detection; Event related potentials (ERPs); Mismatch negativity (MMN); N1 amplitude; Sound intensity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN CELL; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTORY PERIOD; SOUND INTENSITY; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MALE; MEMORY; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0142156676     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000073518     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. American Electroencephalographic Society: American electroencephalographic society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 1991;8:200-202.
2. Beagley HA, Knight JJ: Changes in auditory evoked response with intensity. J Laryngol Otol 1967;81:861-873.
3. Butler RA, Spreng M, Keidel WD: Stimulus repetition rate factors which influence the auditory potential in man. Psychophysiology 1969;5:665-672.
4. Heil P, Rajan R, Irvine DR: Topographic representation of tone intensity along the isofrequency axis of cat primary auditory cortex. Hear Res 1994;76:188-202.
5. Jacobsen T, Schröger E: Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch? Psychophysiology 2001;38:723-727.
6. Jacobsen T, Schröger E: Measuring duration mismatch negativity. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114:1133-1143.
7. Jacobsen T, Schröger E, Horenkamp T, Winkler, I: Mismatch negativity to pitch change: Varied stimulus proportions in controlling effects of neural refractoriness on human auditory eventrelated brain potentials. Neurosci Lett 2003;344:79-82.
8. McCarthy G, Wood CC: Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1985;62:203-208.
9. Näätänen R: Attention and Brain Function. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 1992.
10. Näätänen R, Alho K: Higher-order processes in auditory-change detection. Trends Cogn Sci 1997;2:44-45.
11. Näätänen R, Gaillard A, Mäntysalo S: Early selective attention reinterpreted. Acta Psychol 1978;42:313-329.
12. Näätänen R, Paavilainen P, Alho, K, Reinikainen K, Sams M: Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of auditory sensory memory in the human brain? Neurosci Lett 1989;98:217-221.
13. 1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987;24:375-425.
14. 1 wave. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988;69:523-531.
15. Näätänen R, Tervaniemi M, Sussman E, Paavilainen P, Winkler I: 'Primitive intelligence' in the auditory cortex. Trends Neurosci 2001;24:283-288.
16. Näätänen R, Winkler I: The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol Bull 1999;125:826-859.
17. Paavilainen P, Alho K, Reinikainen K, Sams M, Näätänen R: Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991;78:466-479.
18. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lehnertz K, Lütkenhöner B: Neuromagnetic evidence of an amplitopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989;72:225-231.
19. Picton TW, Goodman WS, Bryce DP: Amplitude of evoked responses to tones of high intensity. Acta Otolaryngol 1970;79:77-82.
20. Picton TW, Woods DL, Proulx GB: Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978;45:198-210.
21. Rapin I, Schimmel H, Tourk LM, Krasnegor LM, Pollack C: Evoked potentials to clicks and tones of varying intensity of waking adults. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1966;21:335-344.
22. Ritter W, Vaughan HG, Costa LD: Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: A study of short term changes in average evoked responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1968;25:550-556.
23. Schröger E: Automatic detection of frequency change is invariant over a large intensity range. Neuroreport 1994;5:825-828.
24. Schröger E: Higher-order processes in auditorychange detection: A response to Näätänen and Alho. Trends Cogn Sci 1997;2:45-46.
25. Schröger E: Measurement and interpretation of the mismatch negativity. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1998;30:131-145.
26. Schröger E, Wolff C: Mismatch response to changes in sound location. Neuroreport 1996;7:3005-3008.
27. Snyder E, Hillyard SA: Long-latency evoked potentials to irrelevant, deviant stimuli. Behav Biol 1976;16:319-331.