Social status as a cue for tacit coordination

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 515-524

  Kwaadsteniet, Erik W de ^a   Dijk, Eric van ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Deference; Salience; Social status; Tacit coordination

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949875804     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abele S., and Stasser G. Coordination success and interpersonal perceptions: Matching versus mismatching. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95 (2008) 576-592
2. Anderson C., and Berdahl J.L. The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (2002) 1362-1377
3. Bacharach M., and Bernasconi M. The variable frame theory of focal points: An experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior 19 (1997) 1-45
4. Ball S.B., and Eckel C.C. Buying status: Experimental evidence on status in negotiation. Psychology & Marketing 13 (1996) 381-405
5. Ball S.B., and Eckel C.C. The economic value of status. Journal of Socio-Economics 27 (1998) 495-514
6. Ball S.B., Eckel C.C., Grossman P.J., and Zame W. Status in markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2001) 161-188
7. Baron R.M., and Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986) 1173-1182
8. Batson C.D., Polycarpou M.P., Harmon-Jones E., Imhoff H.J., Meitchener E.C., Bednar L.L., et al. Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (1997) 105-118
9. Bollen K.A., and Stine R. Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology 20 (1990) 115-140
10. Camerer C.F. Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction (2003), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
11. Caruso E.M., Epley N., and Bazerman M.H. The good, the bad, and the ugly of perspective taking in groups. In: Tenbrunsel A.E., Mannix E.A., and Neale M.A. (Eds). Research on managing groups and teams, volume 8 - Ethics in groups (2006), Elsevier Science, London 201-224
12. Chartrand T.L., and Bargh J.A. The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (1999) 893-910
13. Clark C.R., Clark S., and Polborn M.K. Coordination and status influence. Rationality and Society 18 (2006) 367-391
14. Colman A.M. Thomas C. schelling's psychological decision theory: Introduction to a special issue. Journal of Economic Psychology 27 (2006) 603-608
15. Cooper R., DeJong D., Forsythe B., and Ross T. Selection criteria in coordination games: Some experimental results. American Economic Review 80 (1990) 218-233
16. Cooper R., DeJong D., Forsythe B., and Ross T. Alternative institutions for resolving coordination problems: Experimental evidence on forward induction and preplay communication. In: Friedman J. (Ed). Problems of coordination in economic activity (1994), Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
17. Crawford P.C., Gneezy U., and Rottenstreich Y. The power of focal points is limited: Even minute payoff asymmetry may yield large coordination failures. American Economic Review 98 (2008) 1443-1458
18. Davis M.H. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (1983) 113-126
19. De Kwaadsteniet E.W., Van Dijk E., Wit A., and De Cremer D. Social dilemmas as strong versus weak situations: Social value orientations and tacit coordination under resource size uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42 (2006) 509-516
20. De Waal F. Chimpanzee politics: Sex and power among apes (1982), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
21. Finkel E.L., Campbell W.K., Brunell A.B., Dalton A.N., Scarbeck S.J., and Chartrand T.L. High-maintenance interaction: Inefficient social coordination impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006) 456-475
22. Galinsky A.D., Gruenfeld D.H., and Magee J.C. From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003) 453-466
23. Galinsky A.D., Ku G., and Wang C.S. Perspective-taking: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 8 (2005) 109-125
24. Galinsky A.D., Maddux W.W., Gilin D., and White J.B. Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective-taking and empathy in strategic interactions. Psychological Science 19 (2008) 378-384
25. Galinsky A.D., Magee J.C., Inesi M.E., and Gruenfeld D.H. Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 1068-1074
26. Holm H.J. Gender-based focal points. Games and Economic Behavior 32 (2000) 292-314
27. Keltner D., Gruenfeld D.H., and Anderson C. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review 110 (2003) 265-284
28. Keltner D., Van Kleef G.A., Chen S., and Kraus M.W. A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emerging principles and lines of inquiry. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 40 (2008) 151-192
29. Lammers J., Galinsky A.D., Gordijn E.H., and Otten S. Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psychological Science 19 (2008) 558-564
30. Leavitt H.J. Top down: Why hierarchies are here to stay and how to manage them more effectively (2004), Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA
31. Levi M., Sacks A., and Tyler T. Conceptualizing legitimacy, measuring legitimating beliefs. American Behavioral Scientist 53 (2009) 354-375
32. Luce R.D., and Raiffa H. Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey (1957), Wiley, New York
33. MacKinnon D.P., and Dwyer J.H. Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review 17 (1993) 144-158
34. Magee J.C., and Galinsky A.D. Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals 2 (2008) 351-398
35. Mehta J., Starmer C., and Sugden R. The nature of salience: An experimental investigation of pure coordination games. American Economic Review 84 (1994) 658-673
36. Muller D., Judd C.M., and Yzerbyt V.Y. When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 (2005) 852-863
37. Neale M.A., and Bazerman M.H. The role of perspective-taking ability in negotiating under different forms of arbitration. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36 (1983) 378-388
38. Overbeck J.R., Correll J., and Park B. Internal status sorting in groups: The problem of too many stars. In: Thomas-Hunt M.C., Mannix E., and Neale M.A. (Eds). Research on managing groups and teams, volume 7 - Status and groups (2005), Elsevier, Saint Louis, MO 169-199
39. Preacher K.J., and Hayes A.F. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods - Instruments and Computers 36 (2004) 717-731
40. Preacher K.J., and Hayes A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40 (2008) 879-891
41. Ridgeway C.L. Gender differences in task groups: A status and legitimacy account. In: Webster Jr. M., and Foschi M. (Eds). Status generalization: New theory and research (1988), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA 188-206
42. Ridgeway C.L., and Walker H.A. Status structures. In: Cook K.S., Fine G.A., and House J.S. (Eds). Sociological perspectives on social psychology (1995), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA 281-310
43. Schelling T.C. The strategy of conflict (1960), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
44. Schjelderup-Ebbe T. Contributions to the social psychology of the domestic chicken. In: Schein M.W. (Ed). Social hierarchy and dominance benchmark papers in animal behavior Vol. 3 (1975), Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, PA 35-49
45. Shrout P.E., and Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods 7 (2002) 422-445
46. Sondak H., and Bazerman M.H. Power balance and the rationality of outcomes in matching markets. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (1991) 1-23
47. Stephens N.M., Markus H.R., and Townsend S.S.M. Choice as an act of meaning: The case of social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 (2007) 814-830
48. Stouten J., De Cremer D., and Van Dijk E. I'm doing the best I can (for myself): Leadership and variance of harvesting in resource dilemmas. Group Dynamics - Theory, Research and Practice 9 (2005) 205-211
49. Tiedens L.Z., Chow R.M., and Unzueta M.M. Complementary contrast and assimilation: Interpersonal theory and the social functions of contrast and assimilation effects. In: Stapel D., and Suls J. (Eds). Assimilation and contrast in social psychology (2007), Psychology Press, New York 249-267
50. Tiedens L.Z., and Fragale A.R. Power moves: Complementarity in submissive and dominant nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84 (2003) 558-568
51. Tiedens L.Z., and Jimenez M.C. Assimilation for affiliation and contrast for control: Complementary self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003) 1049-1061
52. Tiedens L.Z., Unzueta M.M., and Young M.J. The desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 (2007) 402-414
53. Tyler T.R. Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology 57 (2006) 375-400
54. Van Beest I., Van Dijk E., De Dreu C.K.W., and Wilke H.A.M. Do-no-harm in coalition formation: Why losses inhibit exclusion and promote fairness cognitions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (2005) 609-617
55. Van Dijk E., De Kwaadsteniet E.W., and De Cremer D. Tacit coordination in social dilemmas: The importance of having a common understanding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (2009) 665-678
56. Van Vugt M. Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10 (2006) 354-371
57. Van Vugt M., Hogan R., and Kaiser R.B. Leadership, followership, and evolution - Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist 63 (2008) 182-196