Not so fast. on some bold neuroscientific claims concerning human agency

Neuroethics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 23-41

  Lavazza, Andrea ^a   De Caro, Mario ^b  

^a Università Roma Tre ^*  (Italy)

^b ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Free will; Human agency; Neuroethics; Neuropolitics; Social neuroscience

Indexed keywords

BRAIN FUNCTION; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HUMAN; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; PHILOSOPHY; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIOLOGY;

EID: 77949659509     PISSN: 18745490     EISSN: 18745504     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12152-009-9053-9     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Churchland, P.S. 2002. Brain-wise. studies in neurophilosophy. Cambridge: MIT.
2. PS Churchland 2008 The impact of neuroscience on philosophy Neuron 60 6 409 411 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.023
3. Edelman, G.M. 2007. Second nature: brain science and human knowledge. New Haven: Yale University.
4. Gazzaniga, M.S. 2008. Human. The science behind what makes us unique. New York: Ecco Books.
5. A Rasmusson 2009 Neuroethics a s brain-based philosophy of life: the case of Michael S. Gazzaniga Neuroethics 2 3 11 10.1007/s12152-008-9024-6
6. Hughes, J. 2004. Citizen cyborg. why democratic societies must respond to the redesigned human of the future. New York: Basic Books.
7. Iacoboni, M. 2008. Mirroring people: the new science of how we connect with others. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
8. Pinker, S. 1999. How the mind works. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
9. Pinker, S. 2002. Blank slate: the modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.
10. Kuhn, T.S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago.
11. De Caro, M. and D. Macarthur. (eds). 2010. Naturalism and Normativity. New York: Columbia University Press.
12. Putnam, H. 2002. The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge: Harvard University.
13. MJ Farah, et al. 2004 Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5 421 425 10.1038/nrn1390
14. NK Logothetis 2008 What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI Nature 453 869 878 10.1038/nature06976
15. FC Keil 2003 Folkscience: coarse interpretations of a complex reality Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 8 368 373 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00158-X (Pubitemid 36952419)
16. JT Cacioppo, et al. 2003 Just because you're imaging the brain doesn't mean you can stop using your head: A primer and set of first principles Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 650 661 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.650 (Pubitemid 37249675)
17. YB Sirota A Das 2009 Anticipatory haemodynamic signals in sensory cortex non predicted by local neuronal activity Nature 457 475 479 10.1038/nature07664
18. A Devor, et al. 2008 Stimulus-induced changes in blood flow and 2-deoxyglucose uptake dissociate in ipsilateral somatosensory cortex The Journal of Neuroscience 28 14347 14357 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4307-08.2008
19. J Rossier 2009 Wiring and plumbing in the brain Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 3 2 10.2289/neuro.09.002.2009
20. J Illes E Racine 2005 Imaging or imagining: a neuroethics challenge informed by genetics American Journal of Bioethics 2 5 18
21. Kane, R. (ed). 2002. Handbook of free will. Oxford: Oxford University.
22. Walter, H. 2001. Neurophilosophy of free will: from libertarian illusions to a concept of natural autonomy. Cambridge: MIT.
23. CS Soon M Brass H-J Heinze J-D Haynes 2008 Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain Nature Neuroscience 11 543 545 10.1038/nn.2112
24. Dennett, D.C. 2003. Freedom evolves. New York: Viking.
25. J Bickle 2008 The molecules of social recognition memory: implications for social cognition, extended mind, and neuroethics Consciousness and Cognition 17 468 474 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.015
26. Iacoboni, M., et al. 2007. This is your brain on politics. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/opinion/11freedman.html.
27. Aron, A., et al. Letter: Politics and the brain. New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/14/opinion/1web14brain.html
28. Alter, A. 2007. Reading the mind of the body politic. Wall Street Journal, 14 December, W1.
29. Editorial. 2007. Mind games: How not to mix science and politics. Nature, 450: 457.
30. D Westen, et al. 2006 Neural bases of motivated reasoning: An fMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. presidential election Journal of Neuroscience 18 11 1947 1958
31. DM Amodio, et al. 2007 Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatives Nature Neuroscience 10 1246 1247 10.1038/nn1979 (Pubitemid 47480301)
32. Aguirre, G.K. 2008. The political brain. Cerebrum. http://dana.org/news/ cerebrum/detail.aspx?id=13242.
33. Editorial. 2008. It's the genes, stupid. New York Times, May 27. http://nytimes.com/2008/05/27/opinion/27tue4.html?r=1
34. JH Fowler LA Baker CT Dawes 2008 Genetic variation in political participation American Political Science Review 102 233 248 10.1017/ S0003055408080209
35. JH Fowler CT Dawes 2008 Two genes predict voter turnout Journal of Politics 70 579 594
36. Settle, J., C.T. Dawes, and J.H. Fowler. 2009. The heritability of partisan attachment. Political Research Quarterly 62: 601-613.
37. Dawes, C.T. and J.H. Fowler. 2009. Partisanship, voting, and the dopamine D2 receptor gene. Journal of Politics 71: 1157-1171.
38. CC Ballew II A Todorov 2007 Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 17948 17953 10.1073/pnas.0705435104 (Pubitemid 350210802)
39. AC Little, et al. 2007 Facial appearance affects voting decisions Evolution and Human Behavior 28 18 27 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.09.002
40. H Walum, et al. 2008 Genetic variation in the vasopressin receptor 1a gene (AVPR1A) associates with pair-bonding behavior in humans Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 37 14153 14156 10.1073/pnas.0803081105
41. LJ Young 2009 Love: neuroscience reveals all Nature 457 148 10.1038/457148a
42. S Whittle, et al. 2008 Prefrontal and amygdala volumes are related to adolescents' affective behaviors during parent-adolescent interactions Proceedings of the National Academic of Sciences 105 3652 3657 10.1073/pnas.0709815105
43. JM Cantor, et al. 2008 Cerebral white matter deficiencies in pedophilic men Journal of Psychiatric Research 42 167 183 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.10.013 (Pubitemid 350278618)
44. SS Shergill 2007 A diffusion tensor imaging study of fasciculi in schizophrenia American Journal of Psychiatry 164 467 473 10.1176/appi.ajp.164.3. 467 (Pubitemid 46513161)
45. PR Szeszko, et al. 2008 Clinical and neuropsychological correlates of white matter abnormalities in recent onset schizophrenia Neuropsychopharmacology 33 976 984 10.1038/sj.npp.1301480
46. EM Vikingstad, et al. 2000 Cortical language lateralization in right handed normal subjects using functional magnetic resonance imaging Journal of the neurological sciences 175 17 27 10.1016/S0022-510X(00)00269-0 (Pubitemid 30227479)
47. I Savic P Lindström 2008 PET and MRI show differences in cerebral asymmetry and functional connectivity between homo- and heterosexual subjects Proceedings of the National Academic of Sciences 105 9403 9408 10.1073/pnas.0801566105
48. Pickett, B. 2006. Homosexuality. In E.N. Zalta (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://stanford.edu/entries/homosexuality/
49. S Han G Northoff 2008 Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: a transcultural neuroimaging approach Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9 646 654 10.1038/nrn2456
50. J Singh J Hallmayer J Illes 2007 Interacting and paradoxical forces in neuroscience and society Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8 153 160 10.1038/nrn2073 (Pubitemid 46146952)
51. D Skolnick Weisberg FC Keil J Goodstein E Rawson JR Gray 2008 The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 470 477 10.1162/jocn.2008.20040
52. DP McCabe AD Castel 2008 Seeing is believing: the effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning Cognition 107 343 352 10.1016/j.cognition. 2007.07.017
53. E Racine O Bar-Ilan J Illes 2006 Brain imaging: a decade of coverage in the print media Science Communication 28 122 143 10.1177/1075547006291990
54. KD Vohs JW Schooler 2008 The value in believing in free will Psychological Science 19 49 54 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02045.x
55. J Greene J Cohen 2004 For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359 1775 1785 10.1098/rstb.2004.1546 (Pubitemid 39606385)
56. Hart, H.L.A. 1968. Punishment and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University.
57. AC Michaels 2004 Fastow and Arthur Andersen: some reflections on corporate criminality, victim status, and retribution Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2 551 571
58. JH Fowler D Schreiber 2008 Biology, politics, and the emerging science of human nature Science 322 912 914 10.1126/science.1158188
59. Lakoff, G. 2008. The political mind: why you can't understand the 21st-century American politics with an 18th-century brain. New York: Viking.
60. Settle, J., C.T. Dawes, P.K. Hatemi, N.A. Christakis, and J.H. Fowler. 2008. Friendships moderate an association between a dopamine gene variant and political ideology. Working paper. http://jhfowler.ucsd.edu.
61. Westen, D. 2007. The political brain: the role of emotion in deciding the fate of the nation. New York: Public Affairs.
62. Fredrickson, G.M. 2003. Racism: a short history. Princeton: Princeton University.
63. Xu Xiaojing, et al. 2009 Do you feel my pain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses The Journal of Neuroscience 29 26 8525 8529 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2418-09.2009
64. I Akirav M Maroun 2007 The role of the medial prefrontal cortex-amygdala circuit in stress effects on the extinction of fear Neural Plasticity 10.1155/2007/30873
65. S Brown, et al. 2006 Neural basis of individual differences in impulsivity: contributions of corticolimbic circuits for behavioural arousal and control Emotion 6 239 245 10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.239 (Pubitemid 44060359)
66. PG Luiten 1985 The cortico-medial amygdale in the central nervous system organization of agonistic behaviour Brain Research 322 283 287 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90597-9
67. G Rammes, et al. 2000 Synaptic plasticity in the basolateral amygdala in transgenic mice expressing dominant-negative cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) in forebrain European Journal of Neuroscience 12 2534 2546 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00108.x (Pubitemid 30497047)
68. L van Tebartz Elst D Ebert B Hesslinger 2007 Amygdala volume status might reflect dominant mode of emotional information processing Archives of General Psychiatry 64 251 252 10.1001/archpsyc.64.2.251 (Pubitemid 46220784)
69. J Fradin C Lefrançois 2007 Dominant ou dominé (dominating or dominated) Cerveau et Psycho 20 36 41
70. Fradin, J. and F. Fradin. 2006. Personnalités et psychophysiopathologie. Paris: Éditions Publibook Université.
71. L Pezawas, et al. 2005 5-HTTLPR polymorphism impacts human cingulate-amygdala interactions: a genetic susceptibility mechanism for depression Nature Neuroscience 8 828 834 10.1038/nn1463 (Pubitemid 43085851)
72. PJ Gianaros, et al. 2007 Perigenual anterior cingulated morphology covaries with perceived social standing Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2 161 173 10.1093/scan/nsm013 (Pubitemid 47399909)
73. NI Eisenberger 2007 Using neuroimaging techniques to explore the relationship between social status and health Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2 159 160 10.1093/scan/nsm031 (Pubitemid 47399908)
74. DH Edwards EA Kravitz 1997 Serotonin, social status and aggression Current Opinion in Neurobiology 7 811 819 10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80140-7 (Pubitemid 28052304)
75. Levy, N. 2007. Neuroethics: challenges for the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
76. Dupré, J. 2001. Human nature and the limits of science. Oxford: Oxford University.
77. Fukuyama, F. 2002. Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Farrer, Strauss and Giroux.
78. A Hart, et al. 2000 Differential response of human amygdala to racial outgroup versus ingroup face stimuli Neuroreport 11 2351 2355 10.1097/00001756-200008030-00004
79. E Phelps, et al. 2000 Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 729 738 10.1162/089892900562552
80. PR Wolpe 2006 Reasons scientists avoid thinking about ethics Cell 125 1023 1025 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.001 (Pubitemid 43866207)
81. Bennett, M.R. and P.M.S. Hacker. 2003. Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.
82. Rose, S. 2005. The future of the brain: the promise and perils of tomorrow's neuroscience. New York: Oxford University.
83. Uttal, W.R. 2001. The new phrenology: the limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain. Cambridge: MIT.
84. E Racine O Bar-Ilan J Illes 2005 fMRI in the public eye Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6 159 164 10.1038/nrn1609
85. De Caro, M. and D. Macarthur (eds). 2004. Naturalism in question. Cambridge: Harvard University.
86. E Vul, et al. 2009 Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies emotion, personality, and social cognition Perspectives on Psychological Science 4 274 290 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01125.x
87. A Abbott 2009 Brain imaging studies under fire Nature 457 245 10.1038/457245a
88. RA Poldrack JA Mumford 2009 Independence in ROI analysis: where is the voodoo? Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 4 2 208 213 10.1093/scan/nsp011
89. C Klein 2009 Images are not the evidence in neuroimaging The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10.1093/bjps/axp035 Advance online publication
90. Smilansky, S. 2000. Free will and illusion. New York: Oxford University.
91. Wegner, D. 2002. The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge: MIT.
92. Kane, R. 1996. The significance of free will. Oxford: Oxford University.
93. Searle, J. 2004. Freedom and neurobiology: reflections on free will, language, and political power. New York: Columbia University.
94. A Roskies 2006 Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 419 423 10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.011 (Pubitemid 44291560)
95. JT Kaplan J Freedman M Iacoboni 2007 Us versus them: political attitudes and party affiliation influence neural response to faces of presidential candidates Neuropsychologia 45 55 64 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.024
96. Ceccarelli, L. 2001. Shaping science with rhetoric: the cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson. Chicago: University of Chicago.
97. E Nahmias 2006 Folk fears about freedom and responsibility: determinism vs. reductionism The Journal of Cognition and Culture 6 215 237 10.1163/156853706776931295
98. S Nichols J Knobe 2007 Moral responsibility and determinism: the cognitive science of folk intuitions Noûs 41 663 685
99. Morse, S.J. 2006. Moral and legal responsibility and the new neuroscience. In Neuroethics: defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy, ed. J. Illes, 33-50. New York: Oxford University.
100. C Kaposi 2009 Will neuroscientific discoveries about free will and selfhood change our ethical practises? Neuroethics 2 51 59 10.1007/s12152-008- 9020-x
101. MG Marmot 2006 Status syndrome: a challenge to medicine JAMA 295 11 1304 1307 10.1001/jama.295.11.1304
102. RM Sapolsky 2005 The influence of social hierarchy on primate health Science 308 5722 648 652 10.1126/science.1106477 (Pubitemid 40594377)
103. CF Zink, et al. 2008 Know your place: neural processing of social hierarchy in humans Neuron 58 2 273 283 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.025
104. PJ Zak AA Stanton S Armadi 2007 Oxytocin increases generosity in humans PLos One 2 11 e1128 10.1371/journal.pone.0001128
105. M Kosfeld, et al. 2005 Oxytocin increases trust in humans Nature 435 673 676 10.1038/nature03701 (Pubitemid 40825511)
106. Zak, P.J. 2008. The Neurobiology of trust. Scientific American, June: 88-95.