Union of geometric constraint-based simulations with molecular dynamics for protein structure prediction

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 98, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1046-1054

  Glembo, Tyler J ^a   Ozkan, S Banu ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949598393     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.11.031     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Baker, D., and A. Sali. 2001. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science. 294: 93-96.
2. Dill, K. A., S. B. Ozkan, ..., V. A. Voelz. 2007. The protein folding problem: when, will it be solved? Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17: 342-346.
3. Moult, J. 2005. A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15: 285-289.
4. Kryshtafovych, A., C. Venclovas, ..., J. Moult. 2005. Progress over the first decade of CASP experiments. Proteins. 61 (Suppl): 225-236.
5. Dill, K. A., S. B. Ozkan, ..., T. R. Weikl. 2008. The protein folding problem. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 37: 289-316.
6. Zhang, Y., A. K. Arakaki, and J. Skolnick. 2005. TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6. Proteins. 61 (Suppl): 91-98.
7. Zhang, Y. 2008. Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18: 342-348.
8. Baker, D. 2006. Prediction and design of macromolecular structures and interactions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 361: 459-463.
9. Rohl, C., C. Strauss, ..., D. Baker. 2004. Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with Rosetta. Proteins. 55: 656-677.
10. Das, R., and D. Baker. 2008. Macromolecular modeling with Rosetta. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77: 363-382.
11. Wu, G. A., E. A. Coutsias, and K. A. Dill. 2008. Iterative assembly of helical proteins by optimal hydrophobic packing. Structure. 16: 1257-1266.
12. Inbar, Y., H. Benyamini, ..., H. Wolfson. 2003. Protein structure prediction via combinatorial assembly of sub-structural units. Bioinformatics. 19: 158-168.
13. Kifer, I., R. Nussinov, and H. Wolfson. 2008. Constructing templates for protein structure prediction by simulation of protein folding pathway. Proteins. 73: 380-395.
14. Fleming, P. J., H. Gong, and G. D. Rose. 2006. Secondary structure determines protein, topology. Protein Sci. 15: 1829-1834.
15. Kolodny, R., and M. Levitt. 2003. Protein decoy assembly using short fragments under geometric constraints. Biopolymers. 68: 278-285.
16. Schulten, K., P. L. Freddolino, ..., M. Gruebele. 2008. Ten-microsecond molecular dynamics simulation of a fast-folding WW domain, Biophys. J. 94: L75-L77.
17. DeBartolo, J., A. Colubri, ..., T. Sosnick. 2008. Mimicking the folding pathway to improve homology-free protein structure prediction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106: 3734-3739.
18. Nymeyer, H. 2009. Energy landscape of the trpzip2 peptide. J. Phys. Chem. B. 113: 8288-8295.
19. Yoda, T., Y. Sugita, and Y. Okamoto. 2004. Comparisons of force fields for proteins by generalized-ensemble simulations. Chem. Phys. Lett. 386: 460-467.
20. Zhou, R., B. J. Berne, and R. Germain. 2001, The free energy landscape for ß hairpin folding in explicit water. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98: 14931-14936.
21. Simmerling, C., B. Strockbine, and A. E. Roitberg. 2002. All-atom structure prediction and folding simulations of a stable protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124: 11258-11259.
22. Rhee, Y. M., and V. S. Pande. 2003. Multiplexed-replica exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding simulation. Biophys. J. 84: 775-786.
23. Liwo, A., M. Khalili, and H. Scheraga. 2005. Ab initio simulations of protein-folding pathways by molecular dynamics with the unitedresidue model of polypeptide chains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102: 2362-2367.
24. Ozkan, S. B., G. A. Wu, ..., K. A. Dill. 2007. Protein folding by zipping and assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104: 11987-11992.
25. Huang, X., G. R. Bowman, and V. S. Pande. 2008. Convergence of folding free energy landscapes via application of enhanced sampling methods in a distributed computing environment. J. Chem. Phys. 128: 205106-205126.
26. Periole, X., and A. E. Mark. 2007. Convergence and sampling efficiency in replica exchange simulations of peptide folding in explicit solvent. J. Chem. Phys. 126: 041903.
27. Paschek, D., H. Nymeyer, and A. E. García. 2007. Replica exchange simulation of reversible folding/unfolding of the Trp-cage miniprotein in explicit solvent: on the structure and possible role of internal water. J. Struct. Biol. 157: 524-533.
28. Chen, J., W. Im, and C. L. Brooks, 3rd. 2006. Balancing solvation and intramolecular interactions: toward a consistent generalized Born force field. J. Am, Chem. Soc. 128: 3728-3736.
29. Seibert, M. M., A. Patriksson, ..., D. van der Spoel. 2005. Reproducible polypeptide folding and structure prediction using molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 354: 173-183.
30. Nguyen, P. H., G. Stock, ..., M. S. Li. 2005. Free energy landscape and folding mechanism of a beta-hairpin in explicit water: a replica exchange molecular dynamics study. Proteins. 61: 795-808.
31. Felts, A. K., Y. Harano, ..., R. M. Levy. 2004. Free energy surfaces of beta-hairpin and alpha-helical peptides generated by replica exchange molecular dynamics with the AGBNP implicit solvent model, Proteins. 56: 310-321.
32. Rao, F., and A. Caflisch. 2003. Replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations of reversible folding. J. Chem. Phys. 119: 4035-4042.
33. Sanbonmatsu, K. Y., and A. E. Garcia. 2002. Structure of Met-enkephalin in explicit aqueous solution using replica exchange molecular dynamics. Proteins. 46: 225-234.
34. Shell, M. S., S. B. Ozkan, ..., K. A. Dill. 2009. Blind test of physicsbased prediction of protein structures. Biophys. J. 96: 917-924.
35. Wells, S., S. Menor, ..., M. F. Thorpe. 2005. Constrained geometric simulation of diffusive motion in proteins. Phys. Biol. 2: S127-S136.
36. Lee, A., I, Streinu, and O. Brock. 2005. A. methodology for efficiently sampling the conformation space of molecular structures. Phys. Biol. 2: S108-S115.
37. Amato, N. M., K. A. Dill, and G. Song. 2003. Using motion planning to map protein folding landscapes and analyze folding kinetics of known native structures. J. Comput. Biol. 10: 239-255.
38. Shehu, A., C. Clementi, and L. Kavraki. 2006. Modeling protein conformational ensembles: from, missing loops to equilibrium fluctuations. Proteins. 65: 164-179.
39. Sugita, Y., and Y. Okamoto. 1999. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem. Phys. Lett. 314: 141-151.
40. Roitberg, A. E., A. Okur, and C. Simmerling. 2007. Coupling of replica exchange simulations to a non-Boltzmann structure reservoir. J. Phys. Chem. B. 111: 2415-2418.
41. Fain, B., and M. Levitt. 2003. Funnel sculpting for in silico assembly of secondary structure elements of proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100: 10700-10705.
42. Jacobs, D. J., A. J. Rader, ..., M. F. Thorpe. 200.1, Protein flexibility predictions using graph theory. Proteins. 44: 150-165.
43. Thorpe, M. F., M. Lei, ..., L. A. Kuhn. 200.1, Protein flexibility and dynamics using constraint theory. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 19: 60-69.
44. Hespenheide, B. M., A. J. Rader, ..., L. A. Kuhn. 2002. Identifying protein folding cores from the evolution of flexible regions during unfolding. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 21; 195-207.
45. Mamonova, T., B. Hespenheide, ..., M. Kurnikova. 2005. Protein flexibility using constraints from molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Biol. 2: S137-S147.
46. Pearlman, D. A., D. Case, ..., P. Kollman. 1995. AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules. Comput. Phys. Commun. 91: 1-41.
47. Onufriev, A., D. Bashford, and D. A. Case. 2000. Modification of the generalized Born model suitable for macromolecules. J. Phys. Chem. B. 104: 3712-3720.
48. Clemente, C., A. E. Garcia, and J. Onuchic. 2003. Interplay among tertiary contacts, secondary structure formation and side-chain packing in the protein folding mechanism: all-atom representation, study of protein L. J. Mol. Biol. 326: 933-954.
49. Boden, M., Z. Yuan, and T. L. Bailey. 2006. Prediction of protein continuum secondary structure with probabilistic models based on NMR solved structures. BMC Bioinformatics. 7:68.
50. Cole, C., J. D. Barber, and G. J. Barton. 2008. The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 36(Web Server issue): W197-W201.
51. Raghava, G. P. S. 2002. APSSP2: a combination method for protein secondary structure prediction based on neural network and example based learning. CASP5 A-132.
52. Rost, B., and C. Sander. 1993. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J. Mol. Biol. 232: 584-599.
53. Jones, D. T. 1999. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 292: 195-202.