Primary stability of custom and anatomical uncemented femoral stems. A method for three-dimensional in vitro measurement of implant stability

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 318-324

  Østbyhaug, Per Olav ^a   Klaksvik, Jomar ^a   Romundstad, Pål ^b   Aamodt, Arild ^a,c  

^a TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b Department of Public Health and General Practice ^*  (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Mechanical testing; Micromotion; Primary stability; Prosthesis design; Total hip replacement

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICAL MEASUREMENT; BONE INGROWTH; CEMENTLESS HIP STEM; CORTICAL BONE; DESIGN DEVELOPMENT; DIRECT MEASURES; DRILLED HOLES; FEMORAL STEMS; HIGH PRECISION; HUMAN CADAVER; IMPLANT STABILITY; IMPLANT-BONE INTERFACE; IN-VITRO; INDIRECT MEASUREMENTS; MEASURING POINTS; MEASURING SITES; MICROMOTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RIGID BODY; STAIR-CLIMBING; STEM LENGTH; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENTS; TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT; TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; DESIGN; HIP PROSTHESES; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; MECHANICAL TESTING; PROSTHETICS; ROTATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

STABILITY;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; CLIMBING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANT; IMPLANT STABILITY; IN VITRO STUDY; JOINT MOBILITY; MEASUREMENT; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MICROMOTION MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATOR; STANDING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; CEMENTATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77949569941     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.12.012     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aamodt A., Kvistad K.A., Andersen E., Lund-Larsen J., Eine J., Benum P., and Husby O.S. Determination of the Hounsfield value for CT-based design of custom femoral stems. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 81B (1999) 143-147
2. Aamodt A., Lund-Larsen J., Eine J., Andersen E., Benum P., and Husby O.S. Changes in proximal femoral strain after insertion of uncemented standard and customised femoral stems. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 83B (2001) 921-929
3. Andreas F., et al. Biomechanical evaluation of two types of short-stemmed hip prostheses compared to the trust plate prosthesis by three-dimensional measurement of micromotions. J. Clin. Biomech. (2009)
4. Baleani M., Cristofolini L., and Toni A. Initial stability of a new hybrid fixation hip stem: experimental measurement of implant-bone micromotion under torsional load in comparison with cemented and cementless stems. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 50 (2000) 605-615
5. Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Heller M., Graichen F., Rohlmann A., Strauss J., and Duda G.N. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J. Biomech. 34 (2001) 859-871
6. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Measurement error. BMJ 312 (1996) 1654
7. Bragdon C.R., Burke D., Lowenstein J.D., O'Connor D.O., Ramamurti B., Jasty M., and Harris W.H. Differences in stiffness of the interface between a cementless porous implant and cancellous bone in vivo in dogs due to varying amounts of implant motion. J. Arthroplasty 11 (1996) 945-951
8. Buhler D.W., Berlemann U., Lippuner K., Jaeger P., and Nolte L.P. Three-dimensional primary stability of cementless femoral stems. Clin. Biomech. 12 (1997) 75-86
9. Buhler D.W., Oxland T.R., and Nolte L.P. Design and evaluation of a device for measuring three-dimensional micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prostheses. Med. Eng. Phys. 19 (1997) 187-199
10. Callaghan J.J., Fulghum C.S., Glisson R.R., and Stranne S.K. The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses - comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 74A (1992) 839-848
11. Cristofolini L. A critical analysis of stress shielding evaluation of hip prostheses. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 25 4-5 (1997) 409-483
12. Davy D.T., Kotzar G.M., Brown R.H., Heiple K.G., Goldberg V.M., Heiple K.G., Berilla J., and Burstein A.H. Telemetric force measurements across the hip after total arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 70A (1988) 45-50
13. Duda G.N., Heller M., Albinger J., Schulz O., Schneider E., and Claes L. Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution. J. Biomech. 31 (1998) 841-846
14. Dujardin F.H., Mollard R., Toupin J.M., Coblentz A., and Thomine J.M. Micromotion, fit, and fill of custom made femoral stems designed with an automated process. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 325 (1996) 276-289
15. Gilbert J.L., Bloomfeld R.S., Lautenschlager E.P., and Wixson R.L. A computer-based biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional motion of cementless hip prostheses. J. Biomech. 25 (1992) 329-340
16. Gortz W., Nagerl U.V., Nagerl H., and Thomsen M. Spatial micromovements of uncemented femoral components after torsional loads. J. Biomech. Eng. 124 (2002) 706-713
17. Gotze C., Steens W., Vieth V., Poremba C., Claes L., and Steinbeck J. Primary stability in cementless femoral stems: custom-made versus conventional femoral prosthesis. Clin. Biomech. 17 (2002) 267-273
18. Harman M.K., Toni A., Cristofolini L., and Viceconti M. Initial stability of uncemented hip stems - an in-vitro protocol to measure torsional interface motion. Med. Eng. Phys. 17 (1995) 163-171
19. Hua J., and Walker P.S. Relative motion of hip stems under load - an in-vitro study of symmetrical, asymmetrical, and custom asymmetrical designs. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 76A (1994) 95-103
20. Kassi J.P., Heller M.O., Stoeckle U., Perka C., and Duda G.N. Stair climbing is more critical than walking in pre-clinical assessment of primary stability in cementless THA in vitro. J. Biomech. 38 (2005) 1143-1154
21. Mcleish R.D., and Charnley J. Abduction forces in one-legged stance. J. Biomech. 3 (1970) 191
22. Monti L., Cristofolini L., and Viceconti M. Methods for quantitative analysis of the primary stability in uncemented hip prostheses. Artif. Organs 23 (1999) 851-859
23. Nogler M., Polikeit A., Wimmer C., Bruckner A., Ferguson S.J., and Krismer M. Primary stability of a ROBODOC (R) implanted anatomical stem versus manual implantation. Clin. Biomech. 19 (2004) 123-129
24. Pilliar R.M., Lee J.M., and Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 208 (1986) 108-113
25. Schneider E., Kinast C., Eulenberger J., Wyder D., Eskilsson G., and Perren S.M. A comparative-study of the initial stability of cementless hip prostheses. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 248 (1989) 200-209
26. Soballe K., Brockstedtrasmussen H., Hansen E.S., and Bunger C. Hydroxyapatite coating modifies implant membrane formation - controlled micromotion studied in dogs. Acta Orthop. Scand. 63 (1992) 128-140
27. Soballe K., Hansen E.S., Rasmussen H.B., Jorgensen P.H., and Bunger C. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions. J. Orthop. Res. 10 (1992) 285-299
28. Speirs A.D., Slomczykowski M.A., Orr T.E., Siebenrock K., and Nolte L.P. Three-dimensional measurement of cemented femoral stem stability: an in vitro cadaver study. Clin. Biomech. 15 (2000) 248-255
29. Stolk J., Verdonschot N., and Huiskes R. Hip-joint and abductor-muscle forces adequately represent in vivo loading of a cemented total hip reconstruction. J. Biomech. 34 (2001) 917-926