The influence of visual contrast and case changes on parafoveal preview benefits during reading

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 805-817

  Wang, Chin An ^a   Inhoff, Albrecht W ^b  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

E Z reader model; Eye movements; Parafoveal preview effects; Reading; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; RETINA FOVEA; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; MALE; READING; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77949563811     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210903147494     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Drieghe, D. (2008). Foveal processing and word skipping during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 856-860.
2. Engbert, R., Longtin, A., & Kliegl, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42, 621-636.
3. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777-813.
4. Francis, W.N., & Kučera. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
5. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, E. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429.
6. Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 29-54). Oxford: Elsevier Inc.
7. Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 667-682.
8. Pollatsek, A., Juhasz, B. J., Reichle, E.D., Machacek, D., & Rayner, K. (2008). Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements during reading: A reversed delayed effect of word length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 726-750.
9. Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 148-162.
10. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 1-56.
11. Radach, R., Reilly, R., & Inhoff, A. W. (2007). Models of oculomotor control in reading: Toward a theoretical foundation of current debates. In R. van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, & R. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 237-269). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
13. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
14. Rayner, K., Juhasz, B. J., & Brown, S. J. (2007). Do readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing of eye movement control in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 230-245.
15. Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2009). Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 115-119.
16. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
17. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445-476.
18. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). E-Z reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement control during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 4-22.
19. Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2003). Foundations of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 429-456). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
20. Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 34-55.
21. Reingold, E. M., & Rayner, K. (2006). Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the E-Z reader model. Psychological Science, 17, 742-746.
22. Starr, M. S., & Rayner, K. (2001). Eye movements during reading: Some current controversies. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 156-163.
23. White, S. J., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A re-examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 891-896.