Conformational dynamics and ligand binding in the multi-domain protein PDC109

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Kim, Hyun Jin ^a   Choi, Moo Young ^b   Kim, Hyung J ^a,c   Llinás, Miguel ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c Korea Institute for Advanced Study   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; PROTEIN PDC109; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; LIGAND; PHOSPHORYLCHOLINE; SEMINAL VESICLE SECRETORY PROTEIN; SEMINAL VESICLE SECRETORY PROTEIN 109, BOS TAURUS;

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; ENERGY TRANSFER; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIMULATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; BINDING SITE; CATTLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; KINETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CATTLE; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; KINETICS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHOSPHORYLCHOLINE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SEMINAL VESICLE SECRETORY PROTEINS;

EID: 77949513778     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009180     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Llinás M (1973) The Conformational State of Iron Proteins. Struct Bonding 17: 135-220.
2. Vogel C, Bashton M, Kerrison ND, Chothia C, Teichmann SA (2004) Structure, function and evolution of multidomain proteins. Curr Opin in Struc Biol 14: 208-216.
3. McLaughlin SH, Jackson SE (2002) Folding and stability of the ligand-binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor. Prot Sci 11: 1926-1936.
4. Douglas JT, von Haller PD, Gehrmann M, Llinás M, Schaller J (2002) The Two-Domain NK1 Fragment of Plasminogen: Folding, Ligand Binding, and Thermal Stability Profile. Biochemistry 41: 3302-3310.
5. Braun T, Ghatkesar MK, Backmann N, Grange W, Boulanger P, et al. (2008) Quantitative time-resolved measurement of membrane protein-ligand interactions using microcantilever array sensors. Nature nanotechnology 4: 179-185.
6. Chalmers MJ, Busby SA, Pascal BD, He Y, Hendrickson CL, et al. (2006) Probing Protein Ligand Interactions by Automated Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem 78: 1005-1014.
7. Derrick TS, McCord EF, Larive CK (2002) Analysis of protein/ligand interactions with NMR diffusion measurements: the importance of eliminating the protein background. J Magnetic Resonance 155: 217-225.
8. Tillett ML, Horsfield MA, Lian LY, Norwood TJ (1999) Protein-ligand interactions measured by 15N-filtered diffusion experiments. J Biomol NMR 13: 223-232.
9. Chilkotia A, Bolanda T, Ratnera BD, Stayton PS (1995) The relationship between ligand-binding thermodynamics and protein-ligand interaction forces measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 69: 2125-2130.
10. Zavodszky MI, Stumpff-Kane AW, Lee DJ, Feig M (2009) Scoring confidence index: statistical evaluation of ligand binding mode predictions. J computer-Aided Molecular Design 23: 289-299.
11. Eddy T, Gerald M (2009) Combining a genetic algorithm with a linear scaling semiempirical method for protein-ligand docking. Theochem 898: 31-41.
12. Pavani P, SarvaMangala D, Murthy JVVS, Ajay Babu P (2008) Protein-Ligand Interaction Studies on 2, 4, 6-trisubstituted Triazine Derivatives as Anti-malarial DHFR Agents using AutoDock. J Biotech 3: 18-23.
13. Brewerton SC (2008) The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking. Current Opinion in Drug Discovery and Development 11: 356-364.
14. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Huey R, Olson AJ (1996) Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: Parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4. J computer-Aided Molecular Design 10: 293-304.
15. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T, Klebe G (1996) A Fast Flexible Docking Method using an Incremental Construction Algorithm. J Mol Biol 261: 470-489.
16. Hart TN, Read RJ (1992) A multiple-start Monte Carlo docking method. Proteins 13: 206-222.
17. Sun Y, Ewing TJA, Skillman AG, Kuntz ID (1998) CombiDOCK: Structurebased combinatorial docking and library design. J Computer-Aided Molecular Design 12: 597-604.
18. Richmond TJ (1984) Solvent accessible surface area and excluded volume in proteins. Analytical equations for overlapping spheres and implications for the hydrophobic effect. J Mol Biol 178: 63-89.
19. Woo HJ, Roux B (2005) Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy from computer simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 6825-6830.
20. Wang J, Deng Y, Roux B (2006) Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Restraining Potentials. Biophys J 91: 2798-2814.
21. Lee MS, Olson MA (2006) Calculation of Absolute Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Using Path and Endpoint Approaches. Biophys J 90: 864-877.
22. Michel J, Verdonk ML, Essex JW (2006) Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Predictions by Implicit Solvent Simulations: A Tool for Lead Optimization? J Med Chem 49: 7427-7439.
23. Jiao D, Golubkov PA, Darden TA, Ren P (2008) Calculation of protein-ligand binding free energy by using a polarizable potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 6290-6295.
24. Wah DA, Fernández-Tornero C, Sanz L, Romero A, Calvete JJ (2002) Sperm coating mechanism from the 1.8 Å crystal structure of PDC-109-phosphoryl-choline complex. Structure 10: 505-514.
25. Swamy MJ (2004) Interaction of bovine seminal plasma proteins with model membranes and sperm plasma membranes. Current Science 87: 203-211.
26. Calvete JJ, Raida M, Sanz L, Wempe F, Scheit KH, et al. (1994) Localization and structural characterization of an oligosaccharide O-linked to bovine PDC-109 Quantitation of the glycoprotein in seminal plasma and on the surface of ejaculated and capacitated spermatozoa. FEBS Lett 350: 203-206.
27. 1H-NMR spectroscopy A correction. FEBS Lett 387: 99-100.
28. Constantine KL, Madrid M, Bányai L, Trexler M, Patthy L, et al. (1992) Refined solution structure and ligand-binding properties of PDC-109 domain b : A collagen-binding type II domain. J Mol Biol 223: 281-298.
29. Greube A, Müller K, Töpfer-Petersen E, Herrmann A, Müller P (2001) Influence of the Bovine Seminal Plasma Protein PDC-109 on the Physical State of Membranes. Biochemistry 40: 8326-8334.
30. Ramakrishnan M, Anbazhagan V, Pratap TV, Marsh D, Swamy MJ (2001) Membrane Insertion and Lipid-Protein Interactions of Bovine Seminal Plasma Protein PDC-109 investigated by Spin-Label Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy. Biophys J 81: 2215-2225.
31. Moreau R, Manjunath P (1999) Charaterization of lipid efflux particles generated by seminal phospholipid-binding proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1438: 175-184.
32. Gwathmey TM, Ignotz GG, Suarez SS (2003) PDC-109 (BSP-A1/A2) Promotes Bull Sperm Binding to Oviductal Epithelium In Vitro and May Be Involved in Forming the Oviductal Sperm Reservoir. Biol Reprod 69: 809-815.
33. Thomas CJ, Anbazhagan V, Ramakrishnan M, Sultan N, Surolia I, et al. (2003) Mechanism of Membrane Binding by the Bovine Seminal Plasma Protein, PDC-109: A Surface Plasmon Resonance Study. Biophys J 84: 3037-3044.
34. Gwathmey TM, Ignotz GG, Müeller JL, Manjunath P, Suarez SS (2006) Bovine Seminal Proteins PDC-109, BSP-A3, and BSP-30-kDa Share Functional Roles in Storing Sperm in the Oviduct. Biol Reprod 75: 501-507.
35. Tannert A, Kurz A, Erlemann KR, Müller K, Herrmann A, et al. (2007) The bovine seminal plasma protein PDC-109 extracts phosphorylcholine-containing lipids from the outer membrane leaflet. Eur Biophys J 36: 461-475.
36. Lefebvre R, Lo M, Suarez SS (1997) Bovine sperm binding to oviductal epithelium involves fucose recognition. Biol Reprod 56: 1198-1204.
37. Suarez SS, Revah I, Lo M, Kölle S (1998) Bull sperm binding to oviductal epithelium is mediated by a Ca2+-dependent lectin on sperm that recognizes Lewis-a trisaccharide. Biol Reprod 59: 39-44.
38. Desnoyers L, Manjunath P (1992) Major proteins of bovine seminal plasma exhibit novel interactions with phospholipid. J Biol Chem 267: 10149-10155.
39. Manjunath P, Syoubeyrand S, Chandonnet L, Roberts KD (1994) Major proteins of bovine seminal plasma inhibit phospholipase A2. Biochem J 303: 121-128.
40. Gasset M, Saiz JL, Laynez J, Sanz L, Gentzel M, et al. (1997) Conformational Features and Thermal Stability of Bovine Seminal Plasma Protein PDC-109 Oligomers and Phosphorylcholine-Bound Complexes. Eur J Biochem 250: 735-744.
41. Romero A, Varela PF, Töpfer-Petersen E, Calvete JJ (1997) Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of bovine seminal plasma PDC-109, a protein composed of two fibronectin type II domains. Proteins 28: 454-456.
42. Müller P, Erlemann KR, Müller K, Calvete JJ, Töpfer-Petersen E, et al. (1998) Biophysical characterization of the interaction of bovine seminal plasma protein PDC-109 with phospholipid vesicles. Eur Biophys J 27: 33-41.
43. Gasset M, Magdaleno JL, Calvete JJ (2000) Biophysical Study of the Perturbation of Model Membrane Structure Caused by Seminal Plasma Protein PDC-109. Arch Biochem and Biophys 374: 241-247.
44. Jelínková P, Ry̌slavá H, Liberda J, Jonáková V, Tichá M (2004) Aggregated forms of bull seminal plasma proteins and tyheir hearpin-binding activity. Collect Czech Chem Commun 69: 616-630.
45. Anbazhagan V, Swamy MJ (2005) Thermodynamics of phosphorylcholine and lysophophatidylcholine binding to the major protein of bovine seminal lasma, PDC-109. FEBS Letters 579: 2933-2938.
46. Manjunath P, Sairam MR (1987) Purification and biochemical characterization of three major acidic proteins. (BSP-A1, BSP-A2 and BSP-A3) from bovine seminal plasma. Biochem J 241: 685-692.
47. For a very recent review on NMA and PCA; see for example, Hayward S, de Groot BL (2008) Molecular Modeling of Porteins: Normal Modes and Essential Dynamics: Andreas Kukol A, ed. Methods in Molecular Biology Humana 443: 89-106.
48. Chipot C, Maigret B, Pearlman DA, Kollman PA (1996) Molecular Dynamics Potential of Mean Force Calculations: A Study of the Toluene-Ammonium π-Cation Interations. J Am Chem Soc 118: 2998-3005.
49. Mecozzi S, West AP Jr, Dougherty DA (1996) Cation-π interations in aromatics of biological and medicinal interest: Electrostatic potential surfaces as a useful qualitative guide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 10566-10571.
50. Cubero E, Luque FJ, Orozco M (1998) Is polarization important in cation-π interations? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 5976-5980.
51. Felder C, Jiang HL, Zhu WL, Chen KX, Silman I, et al. (2001) Quantum/Classical Mechanical Comparison of Cation-p interactions between Tetramethylammonium and Benzene. J Phys Chem A 105: 1326-1333.
52. N1 Reactivity of 2-Chloro-2-methylpropane in the Room-Temperature Ionic Liquid 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium Hexafluorophosphate. J Phys Chem B 112: 2637-2643. and references cited therein.
53. Shoup D, Szabo A (1982) Role of diffusion in ligand binding to macromolecules and cell-bound receptors. Biophys J 40: 33-39.
54. Linse P (1993) Orientation-Averaged Benzene-Benzene Potential of Mean Force in Aqueous Solution. J Am Chem Soc 115: 8793-8797.
55. Briknarová K, Gehrmann M, Bànyai L, Tordai H, Patthy L, et al. (2001) Gelatin-binding region of human matrix metalloproteinase-2. Solution structure, dynamics, and function of the col-23 two-domain construct. J Biol Chem 276: 27613-27621.
56. Morgunova E, Tuuttila A, Bergmann U, Isupov M, Lindqvist Y, et al. (1999) Structure of human pro-matrix metalloproteinase-2: activation mechanism revealed. Science 284: 1667-1670.
57. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, et al. (1983) CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comp Chem 4: 187-217.
58. MacKerell AD Jr, Brooks B, Brooks CL III, Nilsson L, Roux B, et al. (1998) CHARMM: The Energy Function and Its Parameterization with an Overview of the Program. , The Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, PvRSchleyer, et al. (1998) John Wiley and Sons: Berne, Switzerland, 1: 271-277.
59. Bányai L, Trexler M, Koncz S, Gyenes M, Sipos G, et al. (1990) The collagenbinding site of type-II units of bovine seminal fluid protein PDC-109 and fibronectin. Eur J Biochem 193: 801-806.
60. Rios PDL, Cecconi F, Pretre A, Dietler G, Michielin O, et al. (2005) Functional Dynamics of PDZ Binding Domains: A Normal-Mode Analysis. Biophys J 89: 14-21.
61. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, et al. (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comp Chem 26: 1781-1802.
62. Roche O, Kiyama R, Brooks CL III (2001) Ligand-Protein DataBase: Linking protein-ligand complex structures to binding data. J Med Chem 44: 3592-3598. 63. Momany FA, Rone R (1992) Validation of the general purpose QUANTA 3.2/CHARMm force field. J Comp Chem 13: 888-900.
63. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79: 926-935.
64. SOLVATE1.0 is written by Helmut Grubmüller, Theoretical Biophysics Group, Institut für Medizinische Optik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany.
65. Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, et al. (1995) A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Comp Phys 15: 8577-8593.
66. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC (1977) Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comp Phys 23: 327-341.
67. Martyna GJ, Tobias DJ, Klein ML (1994) Constant presseure molecular dynamics algorithm. J Chem Phys 101: 4177-4189.
68. Feller SE, Zhang Y, Pastor RW, Brooks BR (1995) Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method. J Chem Phys 103: 4613-4621.
69. Darve E, Pohorille A (2001) Calculating free energies using average force. J Chem Phys 115: 9169-9183.
70. Rodriguez-Gomez D, Darve E, Pohorille A (2004) Assessing the efficiency of free energy calculation methods. J Chem Phys 120: 3563-3578.
71. Hénin J, Chipot C (2004) Overcoming free energy barriers using unconstrained molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys 121: 2904-2914.
72. Straatsma TP, Berendsen HJC, Stam AJ (1986) Estimation of statistical errors in molecular simulation calculations. Mol Phys 57: 89-95.
73. Molecular graphic representation was obtained via VMD program, Humphrey WF, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics. J Mol Graphics 14: 33-38.