Surface roughness and morphology of three nanocomposites after two different polishing treatments by a multitechnique approach

Dental Materials

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 416-425

  Janus, J ^a   Fauxpoint, G ^a   Arntz, Y ^a   Pelletier, H ^b   Etienne, O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^b INSA DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

AFM; Nanocomposite; Nanoparticles; Polishing; Profilometry; Roughness; SEM; Surface

Indexed keywords

AFM; AVERAGE SURFACE ROUGHNESS; BEFORE AND AFTER; FILTEK SUPREME; GENERAL LINEAR MODELS; HYBRID COMPOSITES; MULTI-TECHNIQUE APPROACH; MULTIPLE COMPARISON; NANO-FILLED COMPOSITES; NANO-FILLERS; OPTICAL PROFILOMETRY; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; ROUGHNESS; SEM; SEM OBSERVATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND MORPHOLOGY; SURFACE TEXTURES;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; FILLERS; GRINDING (MACHINING); METAL ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; NANOCOMPOSITES; NANOPARTICLES; POLISHING; PROFILOMETRY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY;

SURFACE MORPHOLOGY;

FILTEK SUPREME; GRANDIO; NANOCOMPOSITE; RESIN; SYNERGY COMPOSITE RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL POLISHING; LINEAR MODELS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOCOMPOSITES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 77949487263     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Pflug K. Dental materials having a nanoscale filler. US Patent #6,693,143 B2; Dentsply De Trey GmbH; 2004.
2. Zhang X, Kolb BU, Hanggi DA, Craig BD. Dental materials with nano-sized silica particles. US Patent #6,899,948 B2; 3M; 2005.
3. Kleverlaan C.J., and Feilzer A.J. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 21 12 (2005) 1150-1157
4. Lu H., Lee Y.K., Oguri M., and Powers J.M. Properties of a dental resin composite with a spherical inorganic filler. Oper Dent 31 6 (2006) 734-740
5. Beun S., Glorieux T., Devaux J., Vreven J., and Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater 23 1 (2007) 51-59
6. Lohbauer U., Frankenberger R., Kramer N., and Petschelt A. Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 76 1 (2006) 114-120
7. Mesquita R.V., Axmann D., and Geis-Gerstorfer J. Dynamic visco-elastic properties of dental composite resins. Dent Mater 22 3 (2006) 258-267
8. Papadogiannis D.Y., Lakes R.S., Papadogiannis Y., Palaghias G., and Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M. The effect of temperature on the viscoelastic properties of nano-hybrid composites. Dent Mater 24 2 (2008) 257-266
9. Rodrigues Junior S.A., Zanchi C.H., Carvalho R.V., and Demarco F.F. Flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of different types of resin-based composites. Braz Oral Res 21 1 (2007) 16-21
10. Watanabe H., Khera S.C., Vargas M.A., and Qian F. Fracture toughness comparison of six resin composites. Dent Mater 24 3 (2008) 418-425
11. Yuzugullu B., Ciftci Y., Saygili G., and Canay S. Diametral tensile and compressive strengths of several types of core materials. J Prosthodont 17 2 (2008) 102-107
12. Attar N. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 8 1 (2007) 27-35
13. Jung M., Eichelberger K., and Klimek J. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing. Oper Dent 32 4 (2007) 347-355
14. Jung M., Sehr K., and Klimek J. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing. Oper Dent 32 1 (2007) 45-52
15. Senawongse P., and Pongprueksa P. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. J Esthet Restor Dent 19 5 (2007) 265-275
16. Teixeira E.C., Thompson J.L., Piascik J.R., and Thompson J.Y. In vitro toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion of two restorative composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 17 3 (2005) 172-182
17. Turssi C.P., Ferracane J.L., and Serra M.C. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures. Dent Mater 21 7 (2005) 641-648
18. Cavalcante L.M., Masouras K., Watts D.C., Pimenta L.A., and Silikas N. Effect of nanofillers' size on surface properties after toothbrush abrasion. Am J Dent 22 1 (2009) 60-64
19. Kakaboura A., Fragouli M., Rahiotis C., and Silikas N. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J Mater Sci Mater Med 18 January (1) (2007) 155-163
20. Beyth N., Bahir R., Matalon S., Domb A.J., and Weiss E.I. Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites. Dent Mater 24 6 (2008) 732-736
21. Ergucu Z., and Turkun L.S. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 32 2 (2007) 185-192
22. Heintze S.D., Forjanic M., and Rousson V. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro. Dent Mater 22 2 (2006) 146-165
23. Lee Y.K., Lu H., Oguri M., and Powers J.M. Changes in gloss after simulated generalized wear of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 94 4 (2005) 370-376
24. Lu H., Roeder L.B., Lei L., and Powers J.M. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 17 2 (2005) 102-109
25. Nagem Filho H., D'Azevedo M.T., Nagem H.D., and Marsola F.P. Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Braz Dent J 14 1 (2003) 37-41
26. Sarac D., Sarac Y.S., Kulunk S., Ural C., and Kulunk T. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 96 1 (2006) 33-40
27. Silikas N., Kavvadia K., Eliades G., and Watts D. Surface characterization of modern resin composites: a multitechnique approach. Am J Dent 18 2 (2005) 95-100
28. Bollen C.M., Lambrechts P., and Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 13 4 (1997) 258-269
29. Ono M., Nikaido T., Ikeda M., Imai S., Hanada N., Tagami J., et al. Surface properties of resin composite materials relative to biofilm formation. Dent Mater J 26 5 (2007) 613-622
30. Jefferies S.R. Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of-the-art review. Dent Clin North Am 51 2 (2007) 379-397 ix
31. Jones C.S., Billington R.W., and Pearson G.J. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J 196 1 (2004) 42-45
32. Baseren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures. J Biomater Appl 19 2 (2004) 121-134
33. Joniot S., Salomon J.P., Dejou J., and Gregoire G. Use of two surface analyzers to evaluate the surface roughness of four esthetic restorative materials after polishing. Oper Dent 31 1 (2006) 39-46
34. Turkun L.S., and Turkun M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 29 2 (2004) 203-211
35. Gordan V.V., Patel S.B., Barrett A.A., and Shen C. Effect of surface finishing and storage media on bi-axial flexure strength and microhardness of resin-based composite. Oper Dent 28 5 (2003) 560-567
36. Tang A.T., Li J., Ekstrand J., and Liu Y. Cytotoxicity tests of in situ polymerized resins: methodological comparisons and introduction of a tissue culture insert as a testing device. J Biomed Mater Res 45 3 (1999) 214-222
37. Yatabe M., Yasuda N., Ai M., and Okabe Y. Unpolymerized layer on autopolymerizing, hard reline materials. Int J Prosthodont 12 2 (1999) 129-134
38. Barbosa S.H., Zanata R.L., Navarro M.F., and Nunes O.B. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins. Braz Dent J 16 1 (2005) 39-44
39. Lu H., Roeder L.B., and Powers J.M. Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 15 5 (2003) 297-304
40. Watanabe T., Miyazaki M., Takamizawa T., Kurokawa H., Rikuta A., and Ando S. Influence of polishing duration on surface roughness of resin composites. J Oral Sci 47 1 (2005) 21-25
41. Yap A.U., Yap S.H., Teo C.K., and Ng J.J. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 29 1 (2004) 100-104
42. Windisch MS, Zhang X, Rusin RP, Sumitra SB. Clustered particle dental fillers. US Patent #6,730,156 B1; 3M; 2004.
43. Mitra S.B., Wu D., and Holmes B.N. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 134 10 (2003) 1382-1390
44. Whitehead S.A., Shearer A.C., Watts D.C., and Wilson N.H. Comparison of two stylus methods for measuring surface texture. Dent Mater 15 2 (1999) 79-86
45. Grossman E.S., Rosen M., Cleaton-Jones P.E., and Volchansky A. Scientific surface roughness values for resin based materials. SADJ 59 7 (2004) 274 p. 6, 8, 9
46. Marigo L., Rizzi M., La Torre G., and Rumi G. 3-D surface profile analysis: different finishing methods for resin composites. Oper Dent 26 6 (2001) 562-568
47. Chung S.M., and Yap A.U. Effects of surface finish on indentation modulus and hardness of dental composite restoratives. Dent Mater 21 11 (2005) 1008-1016
48. Schmidlin P.R., and Gohring T.N. Finishing tooth-colored restorations in vitro: an index of surface alteration and finish-line destruction. Oper Dent 29 1 (2004) 80-86
49. Harry F.A. Tooth-colored restoratives: principles and techniques. 9th ed. (2002), BC Decker Inc., London
50. Venturini D., Cenci M.S., Demarco F.F., Camacho G.B., and Powers J.M. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 31 1 (2006) 11-17
51. Joniot S.B., Gregoire G.L., Auther A.M., and Roques Y.M. Three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis of surface states obtained after finishing sequences for three composite resins. Oper Dent 25 4 (2000) 311-315
52. Dodge W.W., Dale R.A., Cooley R.L., and Duke E.S. Comparison of wet and dry finishing of resin composites with aluminum oxide discs. Dent Mater 7 1 (1991) 18-20