Flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of different types of resin-based composites

Brazilian Oral Research

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 16-21

  Rodrigues Jr , Sinval Adalberto ^a   Zanchi, Cesar Henrique ^a   de Carvalho, Rodrigo Varella ^a   Demarco, Flávio Fernando ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Composite resins; Inorganic particles; Physical and chemical properties

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147139496     PISSN: 18068324     EISSN: 18073107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242007000100003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adabo GL, Cruz CAS, Fonseca RG, Vaz LG. The volumetric fraction of inorganic particles and the flexural strength of composites for posterior teeth. J Dent. 2003;31(5):353-9.
2. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA, BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater. 1998;14(1):51-6.
3. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Van Doren V, Vanherle G. The impact of composite structure on its elastic response. J Dent Res. 1986;65(5):648-53.
4. Chung SM, Yap AUJ, Chandra SP, Lim CT. Flexural strength of dental composite restoratives: comparison of biaxial and three-point bending test. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;71(2):278-83.
5. Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, DeHoff PH. Weibull analysis and flexural strength of hot-pressed core and veneered ceramic structures. Dent Mater. 2003;19(7):662-9.
6. Ferracane JL, Matsumoto H, Okabe T. Time-dependent deformation of composite resins - Compositional considerations. J Dent Res. 1985;64(11):1332-6.
7. Ikejima I, Nomoto R, McCabe JF. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation. Dent Mater. 2003;19(3):206-11.
8. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4049/2000 - Dentistry - Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. Switzerland: ISO; 2000.
9. Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(6):642-9.
10. Leinfelder KF, Sluder TB, Santos JFF, Wall JT. Five-year clinical evaluation of anterior and posterior restorations of composite resins. Oper Dent. 1980;5:57-65.
11. Loughran GM, Versluis A, Douglas WH. Evaluation of subcritical fatigue crack propagation in a restorative composite. Dent Mater. 2005;21(3):252-61.
12. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29(5):481-508.
13. Musanje L, Ferracane JL. Effects of resin formulation and nanofiller surface treatment on the properties of experimental hybrid resin composite. Biomater. 2004;25(18):4065-71.
14. Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Marquis PM. The reliability of standardized flexure strength testing procedures for a light-activated resin-based composite. Dent Mater. 2005;21(10):911-9.
15. Sabbagh J, Ryelandt L, Bachérius L, Biebuyck JJ, Vreven J, Lambrechts P, et al. Characterization of the inorganic fraction of resin composites. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(11):1090-101.
16. Sabbagh J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Dynamic and static moduli of elasticity of resin-based materials. Dent Mater. 2002;18(1):64-71.
17. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomater. 2003;24(4):655-65.
18. Yap AUJ, Teoh SH. Comparison of flexural properties of composite restoratives using the ISO and mini-flexural tests. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(2):171-7.