Induced resistance to pests and pathogens in trees

New Phytologist

Volumn 185, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 893-908

  Eyles, Alieta ^a   Bonello, Pierluigi ^b   Ganley, Rebecca ^c   Mohammed, Caroline ^d,e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SCION   (New Zealand)

^d Coperative Research Centre for Forestry ^*  (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^f CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Defence; Plant herbivore interactions; Plant pathogen interactions; Secondary metabolites; Systemic resistance

Indexed keywords

MICROORGANISM; PATHOTYPE; PEST CONTROL; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT; SECONDARY METABOLITE;

BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; IMMUNOLOGY; INNATE IMMUNITY; MICROBIOLOGY; PLANT DISEASE; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TREE;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; IMMUNITY, INNATE; PEST CONTROL, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT DISEASES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TREES;

EID: 77949334918     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03127.x     Document Type: Review

References (158)

1. Agrawal AA, Tuzun S, Bent E. Induced plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores: biochemistry, ecology, and agriculture 1999, St Paul, MN, USA, American Phytopathological Society Press
2. Alborn HT, Turlings TCJ, Jones TH, Stenhagen G, Loughrin JH, Tumlinson JH. An elicitor of plant volatiles from beet armyworm oral secretion. Science 1997, 276:945-949.
3. Recognized families of pathogenesis-related proteins. 2009, http://www.bio.uu.nl/~fytopath/PR-families.htm, accessed 4 August 2009, <>
4. Arnold AE, Mejia LC, Kyllo D, Rojas EI, Maynard Z, Robbins N, Herre EA. Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2003, 100:15649-15654.
5. Attaran E, Zeier TE, Griebel T, Zeierb J. Methyl salicylate production and jasmonate signaling are not essential for systemic acquired resistance in arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21:954-971.
6. Azaiez A, Boyle B, Levée V, Séguin A. Transcriptome profiling in hybrid poplar following interactions with Melampsora rust fungi. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 2009, 22:190-200.
7. Babst BA, Ferrieri RA, Gray DW, Lerdau M, Schlyer DJ, Schueller M, Thorpe MR, Orians CM. Jasmonic acid induces rapid changes in carbon transport and partitioning in Populus. New Phytologist 2005, 167:63-72.
8. Babst BA, Ferrieri RA, Thorpe MR, Orians CM. Lymantria dispar herbivory induces rapid changes in carbon transport and partitioning in Populus nigra. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2008, 128:117-125.
9. Balbi V, Devoto A. Jasmonate signalling network in Arabidopsis thaliana: crucial regulatory nodes and new physiological scenarios. New Phytologist 2008, 177:301-318.
10. Baldwin IT, Schultz JC. Rapid changes in tree leaf chemistry induced by damage: evidence for communication between plants. Science 1983, 221:277-279.
11. Barakat A, DiLoretol DS, Zhang Y, Smith C, Baier K, Powell WA, Wheeler N, Sederoff R, Carlson JE. Comparison of the transcriptomes of American chestnut (Castanea dentata) and Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima) in response to the chestnut blight infection. BMC Plant Biology 2009, 9:51-61.
12. Barbehenn RV, Jones CP, Yip L, Tran L, Constabel CP. Limited impact of elevated levels of polyphenol oxidase on tree-feedingcaterpillars: assessing individual plant defenses with transgenic poplar. Oecologia 2007, 154:129-140.
13. Barbehenn RV, Jaros A, Lee G, Mozola C, Weir Q, Salminen JP. Tree resistance to Lymantria dispar caterpillars: importance and limitations of foliar tannin composition. Oecologia 2009, 159:777-788.
14. Bernards MA, Bastrup-Spohr L. Phenylpropanoid metabolism induced by wounding and insect herbivory. Induced plant resistance to herbivory 2008, 189-213. Schaller A, In, ed, New York, Springer
15. Björkman C, Dalin P, Ahrné K. Leaf trichome responses to herbivory in willows: induction, relaxation and costs. New Phytologist 2008, 179:176-184.
16. Blodgett JT, Eyles A, Bonello P. Organ-dependent induction of systemic resistance and systemic susceptibility in Pinus nigra inoculated with Sphaeropsis sapinea and Diplodia scrobiculata. Tree Physiology 2007, 27:511-517.
17. Bolton MD. Primary Metabolism and Plant Defense - Fuel for the Fire. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 2009, 22:487-497.
18. Bonello P, Blodgett JT. Pinus nigra-Sphaeropsis sapinea as a model pathosystem to investigate local and systemic effects of fungal infection of pines. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 2003, 63:249-261.
19. Bonello P, Pearce RB, Watt F, Grime GW. An induced papilla response in primary roots of Scots pine challenged in vitro with Cylindrocarpon destructans. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 1991, 39:213-228.
20. Bonello P, Heller W, Sandermann H. Ozone effects on root disease susceptibility and defence responses in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings of Scots pine Pinus sylvestris L. New Phytologist 1993, 124:653-663.
21. Bonello P, Gordon TR, Storer AJ. Systemic induced resistance in Monterey pine. Forest Pathology 2001, 31:99-106.
22. Bonello P, Storer AJ, Gordon TR, Wood DL, Heller W. Systemic effects of Heterobasidion annosum on ferulic acid glucoside and lignin of pre-symptomatic ponderosa pine phloem, and potential effects on bark beetle-associated fungi. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2003, 29:1167-87.
23. Bonello P, Gordon TR, Herms DA, Wood DL, Erbilgin N. Nature and ecological implications of pathogen-induced systemic resistance in conifers: a novel hypothesis. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 2006, 68:95-104.
24. Bonello P, Capretti P, Luchi N, Martini V, Michelozzi M. Systemic effects of Heterobasidion annosum s.s. infection on severity of Diplodia pinea tip blight and terpenoid metabolism in Italian stone pine Pinus pinea. Tree Physiology 2008, 28:1653-1660.
25. Bostock RM. Signal crosstalk and induced resistance: straddling the line between cost and benefit. Annual Review of Phytopathology 2005, 43:545-580.
26. Broekaert WF, Delaure SL, De Bolle MFC, Cammuel BPA. The role of ethylene in host-pathogn interactions. Annual Review of Phytopathology 2006, 44:393-416.
27. Chassot C, Buchala A, Schoonbeek H, Metraux JP, Lamotte O. Wounding of Arabidopsis leaves causes a powerful but transient protection against Botrytis infection. Plant Journal 2008, 55:555-567.
28. Chester KS. The problem of acquired physiological immunity in plants. Quarterly Review of Biology 1933, 8:129-154. 275-324
29. Christiansen E, Krokene P, Berryman AA, Franceschi VR, Krekling T, Lieutier F, Lonneborg A, Solheim H. Mechanical injury and fungal infection induce acquired resistance in Norway spruce. Tree Physiology 1999, 19:355-381.
30. Coleman HD, Park JY, Nair R, Chapple C, Mansfield SD. RNAi-mediated suppression of p-coumaroyl-CoA 3′-hydroxylase in hybrid poplar impacts lignin deposition and soluble secondary metabolism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2008, 105:4501-4506.
31. Conrath U, Beckers GJM, Flors V, García-Agustín P, Jakab G, Mauch F. Priming: getting ready for battle. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactactions 2006, 19:1062-1071.
32. Cooper WR, Rieske LK. Differential responses in American (Castanea dentata Marshall) and Chinese (C. mollissima Blume) chestnut (Falales: Fagaceae) to foliar application of jasmonic acid. Chemoecology 2008, 18:121-127.
33. Cui J, Bahrami AK, Pringle EG, Hernandez-Guzman G, Bender CL, Pierce NE, Ausube FM. Pseudomonas syringae manipulates systemic plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2005, 102:1791-1796.
34. von Dahl CC, Baldwin IT. Deciphering the role of ethylene in plant-herbivore interactions. Journal of Plant Growth Regulators 2007, 26:201-209.
35. Develey-Rivière MP, Galiana E. Resistance to pathogens and host developmental stage: a multifaceted relationship within the plant kingdom. New Phytologist 2007, 175:405-416.
36. Dicke M, Van Loon JJA, Soler R. Chemical complexity of volatiles from plants induced by multiple attack. Nature Chemical Biology 2009, 5:317-324.
37. Dolch R, Tscharntke T. Defoliation of alders (Alnus glutinosa) affects herbivory by leaf beetles on undamaged neighbours. Oecologia 2000, 125:504-511.
38. Dukes JS, Pontius J, Orwig D, Garnas JR, Rodgers VL, Brazee N, Cooke B, Theoharides KA, Stange EE, Harrington R. Responses of insect pests, pathogens, and invasive plant species to climate change in the forests of northeastern North America: what can we predict? Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2009, 39:231-248.
39. Dunn JP, Potter DA, Kimmerer TW. Carbohydrate reserves, radial growth, and mechanisms of resistance of oak trees to phloem-boring insects. Oecologia 1990, 83:458-468.
40. Durrant WE, Dong X. Systemic acquired resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 2004, 42:185-209.
41. Enebak SA, Carey WA. Evidence for induced systemic protection to fusiform rust in loblolly pine by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Plant Disease 2000, 84:306-308.
42. Erbilgin N, Raffa K. Effects of host tree species on attractiveness of tunnelling pine engravers, Ips pini, to conspecifics and insect predators. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2000, 26:823-840.
43. Erbilgin N, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Zeneli G, Gershenzon J. Exogenous application of methyl jasmonate elicits defenses in Norway spruce (Picea abies) and reduces host colonization by the bark beetle Ips typographus. Oecologia 2006, 148:426-436.
44. van Etten HD, Mansfield JW, Bailey JA, Farmer E. Two classes of plant antibiotics: phytoalexins versus " phytoanticipins" Plant Cell 1994, 6:1191-1192.
45. Eyles A, Davies NW, Yuan ZQ, Mohammed C. Host responses to natural infection by Cytonaema sp. in the aerial bark of Eucalyptus globulus. Forest Pathology 2003, 33:317-331.
46. Eyles A, Chorbadjian R, Wallis C, Hansen R, Cipollini D, Herms D, Bonello P. Cross-induction of systemic induced resistance between an insect and a fungal pathogen in Austrian pine over a fertility gradient. Oecologia 2007, 153:365-374.
47. Eyles A, Beadle C, Barry K, Francis A, Glen M, Mohammed C. Management of fungal root-rot pathogens in tropical acacia plantations. Forest Pathology 2008, 38:332-355.
48. Facchini PJ. Alkaloid biosynthesis in plants: biochemistry, cell biology, molecular regulation, and metabolic engineering applications. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 2001, 52:29-66.
49. Felton GW. Caterpillar secretions and induced plant responses. Induced plant resistance to herbivory 2008, 369-389. Schaller A. In, ed, New York, Springer
50. Felton GW, Donato KK, Broadway RM, Duffey SS. Impact of oxidized plant phenolics on the nutritional quality of dietary protein to a noctuid herbivore, Spodoptera exigua. Journal of Insect Physiology 1992, 38:277-285.
51. Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytologist 2005, 167:353-375.
52. Frost CJ, Hunter MD. Herbivore-induced shifts in carbon and nitrogen allocation in red oak seedlings. New Phytologist 2008, 178:835-845.
53. Frost CJ, Appel HM, Carlson JE, De Moraes CM, Mescher MC, Schultz JC. Within-plant signalling via volatiles overcomes vascular constraints on systemic signaling and primes responses against herbivores. Ecological Letters 2007, 10:490-498.
54. Frost CJ, Mescher MC, Dervinis C, Davis JM, Carlson JE, De Moraes CM. Priming defense genes and metabolites in hybrid poplar by the green leaf volatile cis-3-hexenyl acetate. New Phytologist 2008, 180:722-734.
55. Ganley RJ, Sniezko RA, Newcombe G. Endophyte-mediated resistance against white pine blister rust in Pinus monticola. Forest Ecology and Management 2008, 255:2751-2760.
56. Gatehouse JA. Plant resistance towards insect herbivores: a dynamic interaction. New Phytologist 2002, 156:145-169.
57. Goellner K, Conrath U. Priming: it's all the world to induced disease resistance. European Journal of Plant Pathology 2008, 121:233-242.
58. Gordon TR. Pitch canker disease of pines. Phytopathology 2006, 96:657-659.
59. Gordon TR, Storer AJ, Wood DL. The pitch canker epidemic in California. Plant Disease 2001, 85:1128-1139.
60. Gould N, Reglinski T, Spiers M, Taylor JT. Physiological trade-offs associated with methyl jasmonate - induced resistance in Pinus radiata. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2008, 38:677-684.
61. Grant M, Lamb C. Systemic immunity. Current Opinions in Plant Biology 2006, 9:414-420.
62. Green TR, Ryan CA. Wound-induced proteinase inhibitor in plant leaves: a possible defense mechanism against insects. Science 1972, 175:776-777.
63. Hammerschmidt R. Phytoalexins: what have we learned after 60 years? Annual Review of Phytopathlogy 1999, 37:285-306.
64. Hammerschmidt R. Host-pathogen interaction in conifers: complicated systems yield interesting possibilities for research. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 2006, 68:93-94.
65. Hammerschmidt R. Introduction: definitions and some history. Induced resistance for plant disease control: a sustainable approach to crop protection 2007, 1-8. Walters DNewton ALyon G. In, eds, Oxford, UK, Blackwell Publishing
66. Hammerschmidt R, Nicholson RL. A survey of plant defense responses to pathogens. Induced plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores 1999, 55-71. Agrawal AA, Tuzun SBent E. In, eds, St Paul, MN, USA, American Phytopathological Society Press
67. Haukioja E. Inducible defences of white birch to a geometrid defoliator, Epirrita autumnata. Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on insect-plant relationships 1982, 199-203. Visser JHMinks AK. In, eds, Wageningen, the Netherlands, Pudoc
68. Haukioja E, Koricheva J. Tolerance to herbivory in woody vs. herbaceous plants. Evolutionary Ecology 2000, 14:551-562.
69. Haukioja E, Neuvonen S. Induced long-term resistance of birch foliage against defoliators: defensive or incidental? Ecology 1985, 66:1303-1308.
70. Heijari J, Nerg AM, Kainulainen P, Viiri H, Vuorinen M, Holopainen JK. Application of methyl jasmonate reduces growth but increases chemical defense and resistance against Hylobius abietis in Scots pine seedlings. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2005, 115:117-124.
71. Heijari J, Nerg AM, Kainulainen P, Viiri H, Vuorinen M, Holopainen JK. Long-term effects of exogenous methyl jasmonate application on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) needle chemical defence and diprionid sawfly performance. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2008, 128:162-171.
72. Heil M. Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytologist 2008, 178:41-61.
73. Henery ML, Wallis IR, Stone C, Foley WJ. Methyl jasmonate does not induce changes in Eucalyptus grandis leaves that alter the effect of constitutive defences on larvae of a specialist herbivore. Oecologia 2008, 156:847-859.
74. Hilker M, Kobs C, Varma M, Schrank K. Insect egg deposition induces Pinus sylvestris to attract egg parasitoids. Journal of Experimental Biology 2002, 205:455-461.
75. Hossain MM, Sultana F, Kubota M, Koyama H, Hyakumachi M. Systemic resistance to bacterial leaf speck pathogen in Arabidopsis thaliana induced by the culture filtrate of a plant growth-promoting fungus (PGPF) Phoma sp GS8-1. Journal of General Plant Pathology 2008, 74:213-221.
76. Howe GA, Jander G. Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annual Review of Plant Biology 2008, 59:41-66.
77. Huber DPW, Philippe RN, Madilao LL, Sturrock RN, Bohlmann J. Changes in anatomy and terpene chemistry in roots of Douglas-fir seedlings following treatment with methyl jasmonate. Tree Physiology 2005, 25:1075-1083.
78. Huckelhoven R. Cell wall - associated mechanisms of disease resistance and susceptibility. Annual Review of Phytopathology 2007, 45:101-127.
79. Hudgins JW, Franceschi V. Methyl jasmonate-induced ethylene production is responsible for conifer phloem defense responses and reprogramming of stem cambial zone for traumatic resin duct formation. Plant Physiology 2004, 135:2134-2149.
80. Hudgins JW, Christiansen E, Franceschi VR. Methyl jasmonate induces changes mimicking anatomical defenses in diverse members of the Pinaceae. Tree Physiology 2003, 23:361-371.
81. Hudgins JW, Christiansen E, Franceschi VR. Induction of anatomically based defense responses in stems of diverse conifers by methyl jasmonate: a phylogenetic perspective. Tree Physiology 2004, 24:251-264.
82. Jones JD, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444:323-329.
83. Jongsma MA, Beekwilder J. Plant protease inhibitors: functional evolution for defence. Induced plant resistance to herbivory 2008, 235-253. Schaller A, In, ed, New York, Springer
84. Karban R, Baldwin IT. Induced responses to herbivory 1997, Chicago, IL, USA, University of Chicago Press
85. Karban R, Baldwin IT, Baxter KJ, Laue G, Felton GW. Communication between plants: induced resistance in wild tobacco plants following clipping of neighboring sagebrush. Oecologia 2000, 125:66-71.
86. Keeling CI, Bohlmann J. Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defence of conifers against insects and pathogens. New Phytologist 2006, 170:657-675.
87. Kessler A, Baldwin IT. Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. Annual Review of Plant Biology 2002, 53:299-328.
88. Kiraly L, Barnaz B, Kiralyz Z. Plant resistance to pathogen infection: forms and mechanisms of innate and acquired resistance. Journal of Phytopathology 2007, 155:385-396.
89. Kogel KH, Franken P, Huckelhoven R. Endophyte or parasite - what decides? Current Opinions in Plant Biology 2006, 9:358-363.
90. Kontunen-Soppela S, Ossipov V, Ossipova S, Oksanen E. Application of metabolomics to genotype and phenotype discrimination of birch trees grown in a long-term open-field experiment. Global Change Biology 2007, 13:1053-1067.
91. Kozlowski G, Buchala A, Metraux JP. Methyl jasmonate protects Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) seedlings against Pythium ultimum Trow. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 1999, 55:53-58.
92. Krause SC, Raffa KF. Comparison of insect, fungal, and mechanically induced defoliation of larch - effects on plant productivity and subsequent host susceptibility. Oecologia 1992, 90:411-416.
93. Krause SC, Raffa KF. Defoliation intensity and larval age interact to affect sawfly performance on previously injured Pinus resinosa. Oecologia 1995, 102:24-30.
94. Krokene P, Nagy NE, Solheim H. Methyl jasmonate and oxalic acid treatment of Norway spruce: anatomically based defense responses and increased resistance against fungal infection. Tree Physiology 2008, 28:29-35.
95. Kuc J. Induced systemic resistance in plants to diseases caused by fungi and bacteria. The dynamics of host defence 1983, 191-221. Bailey JADeverall BJ. In, eds, Sydney, Australia, Academic Press
96. Leadbeater A, Staub T. Exploitation of induced resistance: a commercial perspective. Induced resistance for plant defence: a sustainable approach to crop protection 2007, 229-241. Walters D, Newton ALyon G. In, eds, Oxford, UK, Blackwell Publishing
97. Lehr NA, Schrey SD, Hampp R, Tarkka MT. Root inoculation with a forest soil streptomycete leads to locally and systemically increased resistance against phytopathogens in Norway spruce. New Phytologist 2008, 177:965-976.
98. Liu JJ, Ekramoddoullah AKM, Yu XS. Differential expression of multiple PR10 proteins in western white pine following wounding, fungal infection and cold-hardening. Physiology Plantarum 2003, 119:544-553.
99. van Loon LC. Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. European Journal of Plant Pathology 2007, 119:243-254.
100. van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology 1998, 36:453-483.
101. van Loon LC, Rep M, Pieterse CMJ. Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology 2006, 44:135-162.
102. Luchi N, Ma R, Capretti P, Bonello P. Systemic induction of traumatic resin ducts and resin flow in Austrian pine by wounding and inoculation with Sphaeropsis sapinea and Diplodia scrobiculata. Planta 2005, 221:75-84.
103. Lyytikainen P. Effects of natural and artificial defoliations on sawfly performance and foliar chemistry of Scots pine saplings. Annales Zoologici Fennici 1994, 31:307-318.
104. Major IT, Constabel CP. Molecular analysis of poplar defense against herbivory. Comparison of wound- and insect elicitor induced gene expression. New Phytologist 2006, 172:617-635.
105. Major IT, Constabel CP. Shoot-root defense signaling and activation of root defense by leaf damage in poplar. Canadian Journal of Botany 2007, 85:1171-1181.
106. Mattiacci L, Dicke M, Posthumus MA. Beta-glucosidase - an elicitor of herbivore-induced plant odor that attracts host-searching parasitic wasps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 1995, 92:2036-2040.
107. Mauch-Mani B, Mauch F. The role of abscisic acid in plant-pathogen interactions. Current Opinions in Plant Biology 2005, 8:409-414.
108. McComb JA, O'Brien P, Calver M, Staskowski P, Jardine N, Eshraghi L, Ellery J, Gilovitz J, Scott P, O'Brien J. Research into natural and induced resistance in Australian native vegetation of Phytophthora cinnamomi and innovative methods to contain and/or eradicate within localised incursions in areas of high biodiversity in Australia. Enhancing the efficacy of phosphite with the addition/supplementation of other chemicals such as those known to be involved in resistance. 2008, Prepared by the Centre for Phytophthora Science and Management for the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, p
109. McNee WR, Bonello P, Wood DL, Storer AJ, Gordon TR. Feeding response of Ips paraconfusus to phloem and phloem metabolites of Heterobasidion annosum-inoculated ponderosa pine, Pinus ponderosa. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2003, 29:1183-1202.
110. Miller B, Madilao LL, Ralph S, Bohlmann J. Insect-induced conifer defense. White pine weevil and methyl jasmonate induce traumatic resinosis, de novo formed volatile emissions, and accumulation of terpenoid synthase and putative octadecanoid pathway transcripts in Sitka spruce. Plant Physiology 2005, 137:369-382.
111. Miranda M, Ralph SG, Mellway R, Heath M, Bohlmann J, Constabel P. The transcriptional response of hybrid poplar (Populus trichocarpa × P-deltoides) to infection by Melampsora medusae leaf rust involves induction of flavonoid pathway genes leading to the accumulation of proanthocyanidins. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 2007, 20:816-831.
112. Mithofer A, Wanner G, Boland W. Effects of feeding Spodoptera littoralis on lima bean leaves. II. Continuous mechanical wounding resembling insect feeding is sufficient to elicit herbivory-related volatile emission. Plant Physiology 2005, 137:1160-1168.
113. Moret A, Munoz Z. Control of Diplodid pinea and D-scrobiculata in Pinus halepensis by 5-chloro-salicylic acid. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 2007, 46:150-156.
114. Mumm R, Hilker M. Direct and indirect chemical defence of pine against folivorous insects. Trends in Plant Science 2006, 11:351-358.
115. Mumm R, Schrank K, Wegener R, Schulz S, Hilker M. Chemical analysis of volatiles emitted by Pinus sylvestris after induction by insect oviposition. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2003, 29:1235-1252.
116. Musser RO, Farmer E, Peiffer M, Williams SA, Felton GW. Ablation of caterpillar labial salivary glands: technique for determining the role of saliva in insect-plant interactions. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2006, 32:981-992.
117. Nagy NE, Fossdal CG, Krokene P, Krekling T, Lønneborg A, Solheim H. Induced responses to pathogen infection in Norway spruce phloem: changes in polyphenolic parenchyma cells, chalcone synthase transcript levels and peroxidase activity. Tree Physiology 2004, 24:505-515.
118. Ollerstam O, Larsson S. Salicylic acid mediates resistance in the willow Salix viminalis against the gall midge Dasineura marginemtorquens. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2003, 29:63-174.
119. van Oosten VR, Bodenhausen N, Reymond P, Van Pelt JA, Van Loon LC, Dicke M, Pieterse CMJ. Differential Effectiveness of Microbially Induced Resistance Against Herbivorous Insects in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 2008, 21:919-930.
120. Park SW, Kaimoyo E, Kumar D, Mosher S, Klessig DF. Methyl salicylate is a critical mobile signal for plant systemic acquired resistance. Science 2007, 318:113-116.
121. Pearce RB. Antimicrobial defences in the wood of living trees. New Phytologist 1996, 132:203-233.
122. Pedranzani H, Sierra-de-Grado R, Vigliocco A, Miersch O, Abdala G. Cold and water stresses produce changes in endogenous jasmonates in two populations of Pinus pinaster Ait. Plant Growth Regulator 2008, 52:111-116.
123. Philippe RN, Bohlmann J. Poplar defense against insect herbivores. Canadian Journal of Botany 2007, 85:1111-1126.
124. Pieterse CMJ, Leon-Reyes A, Van der Ent A, Van Wees SCM. Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity. Nature Chemical Biology 2009, 5:308-316.
125. Piggott N, Ekramoddoullah AKM, Liu JJ, Yu XS. Gene cloning of a thaumatin-like (PR-5) protein of western white pine (Pinus monticola D. Don) and expression studies of members of the PR-5 group. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 2004, 64:1-8.
126. Quentin A, Pinkard EA, Beadle C, Wardlaw TJ, O'Grady AP, Paterson S, Mohammed CL. Do artificial and natural defoliation have similar effects on physiology of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. seedlings? Annals of Forest Science 2010, 67:203-211.
127. Ralph S, Yueh H, Friedmann MF, Aeschliman D, Zeznik JA, Nelson CC, ButterWeld YSN, Kirkpatrick R, Liu J, Jones SJM. Conifer defense against insects: microarray gene expression profiling of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) induced by mechanical wounding or feeding by spruce budworm (Choristoneura occidentalis) or white pine weevil (Pissodes strobe) reveals large-scale changes of the host transcriptome. Plant, Cell & Environment 2006, 29:545-570.
128. Rapley L, Allen GR, Potts BR, Davies NW. Constitutive or induced defences - how does Eucalyptus globulus defend itself from larval feeding? Chemoecology 2008, 17:235-243.
129. Reglinski T, Taylor JT, Dick MA. Chitosan induces resistance to pitch canker in Pinus radiata. New Zeal Journal of Forest Science 2004, 34:49-58.
130. Rhoades DF. Responses of alder and willdow to attack by tent caterpillars and webworms: evidence for pheromonal sensitivity of willows. Plant resistance to insects 1983, 55-68. Hedin PA. In, ed, Washington, DC, USA, American Chemical Society
131. Rinaldi C, Kohler A, Frey P, Duchaussoy F, Ningre N, Couloux A, Wincker P, Le Thiec D, Fluch S, Martin F. Transcript profiling of poplar leaves upon infection with compatible and incompatible strains of the foliar rust Melampsora larici-populina. Plant Physiology 2007, 144:347-366.
132. Robinson RM, Jensen GD, Morrison DJ. Necrophylactic periderm formation in the roots of western larch and Douglas fir trees infected with Armillaria ostoyae. I. The response to abiotic wounding in non-infected roots. Forest Pathology 2004, 34:105-118.
133. Robinson AR, Ukrainetz NK, Kang KY, Mansfield SD. Metabolite profiling of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) field trials reveals strong environmental and weak genetic variation. New Phytologist 2007, 174:762-773.
134. Roden DB, Mattson WJ. Rapid induced resistance and host species effects on gypsy moth, (Lymantria dispar L.): Implications for outbreaks on three tree species in the boreal forest. Forest Ecology and Management 2008, 255:1868-1873.
135. Rodriguez R, Redman R. More than 400 million years of evolution and some plants still can't make it on their own: plant stress tolerance via fungal symbiosis. Journal of Experimental Botany 2008, 59:1109-1114.
136. Ruuhola T, Yang SY, Ossipov V, Haukioja E. Foliar oxidases as mediators of the rapidly induced resistance of mountain birch against Epirrita autumnata. Oecologia 2008, 154:725-730.
137. Saravesi K, Markkola A, Rautio P, Roitto M, Tuomi J. Defoliation causes parallel temporal responses in a host tree and its fungal symbionts. Oecologia 2008, 156:117-123.
138. Schmelz EA, Carroll MJ, LeClere S, Phipps SM, Meredith J, Chourey PS, Alborn HT, Teal PEA. Fragments of ATP synthase mediate plant perception of insect attack. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2006, 103:8894-8899.
139. Shepherd WP, Sullivan BT, Goyer RA, Klepzig KD. Electrophysiological and olfactometer responses of two histerid predators to three pine bark beetle pheromones. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2005, 31:1101-1110.
140. Simon M, Hilker M. Herbivores and pathogens on willow: do they affect each other? Agriculture and Forest Entomology 2003, 5:275-284.
141. Smith AH, Gill WM, Pinkard EA, Mohammed CL. Anatomical and histochemical defence responses induced in juvenile leaves of Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens by Mycosphaerella infection. Forest Pathology 2007, 37:361-373.
142. Swedjemark G, Karlsson B, Stenlid J. Exclusion of Heterobasidion parviporum from inoculated clones of Picea abies and evidence of systemic induced resistance. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 2007, 22:110-117.
143. van Tol RWHM, Van der Sommen ATC, Boff MIC, Van Bezooijen J, Sabelis MW, Smits PH. Plants protect their roots by alerting the enemies of grubs. Ecological Letters 2001, 4:292-294.
144. Trewhella KE, Leather SR, Day KR. Insect induced resistance in Lodgepole pine: effects on two pine feeding insects. Journal of Applied Entomology 1997, 121:129-136.
145. Tsai CJ, Harding SA, Tschaplinski TJ, Lindroth RL, Yuan YN. Genome-wide analysis of the structural genes regulating defense phenylpropanoid metabolism in Populus. New Phytologist 2006, 172:47-62.
146. Tscharntke T, Thiessen S, Dolch R, Boland W. Herbivory, induced resistance, and interplant signal transfer in Alnus glutinosa, Biochemical Systematics. Ecology 2001, 29:1025-1047.
147. Tuskan GA, DiFazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, Hellsten U, Putnam N, Ralph S, Rombauts S, Salamov A. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray. Science 2006, 313:1596-1604.
148. Utsumi S, Ohgushi T. Host plant variation in plant-mediated indirect effects: moth boring-induced susceptibility of willows to a specialist leaf beetle. Ecological Entomology 2008, 33:250-260.
149. Vallad GE, Goodman RM. Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop Science 2004, 44:1920-1934.
150. Vinale F, Sivasithamparam K, Ghisalberti EL, Marra R, Woo SL, Lorito M. Trichoderma-plant-pathogen interactions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2008, 40:1-10.
151. Volt AC, Klessig DF, Park SW. Systemic acquired resistance: the elusive signal(s). Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2009, 11:436-442.
152. Wallis C, Eyles A, Chorbadjian R, Riedel K, Schwartz S, Hansen R, Cipollini D, Herms D, Bonello P. Systemic induction of phloem secondary metabolism and its relationship to resistance to a canker pathogen in Austrian pine. New Phytologist 2008, 177:767-778.
153. Walters D. Are plants in the field already induced? Implications for practical disease control. Crop Protection 2009, 28:459-465.
154. Wang J, Constabel CP. Polyphenol oxidase overexpression in transgenic Populus enhances resistance to herbivory by forest tent caterpillar (Malacosoma disstria). Planta 2004, 220:87-96.
155. Wang D, Eyles A, Mandich D, Bonello P. Systemic aspects of host-pathogen interactions in Austrian pine (Pinus nigra): a proteomics approach. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 2006, 68:149-157.
156. van Wees SCM, Van der Ent S, Pieterse CMJ. Plant immune responses triggered by beneficial microbes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2008, 11:443-448.
157. Witzell J, Martin JA. Phenolic metabolites in the resistance of northern forest trees to pathogens - past experiences and future prospects. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2008, 38:2711-2727.
158. Zeneli G, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T, Gershenzon J. Methyl jasmonate treatment of mature Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees increases the accumulation of terpenoid resin components and protects against infection by Ceratocystis polonica, a bark beetle-associated fungus. Tree Physiology 2006, 26:977-988.