Direct and indirect chemical defence of pine against folivorous insects

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 351-358

  Mumm, Roland ^a,b   Hilker, Monika ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TERPENE;

ANIMAL; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; INSECT; METABOLISM; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PINE; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS; INSECTS; PINUS; TERPENES;

HEXAPODA; INSECTA; SYMPHYTA;

EID: 33746264028     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.05.007     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Richardson D.M., and Rundel P.W. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus: an introduction. In: Richardson D.M. (Ed). Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus (1998), Cambridge University Press 3-46
2. Franceschi V.R., et al. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol. 167 (2005) 353-376
3. Larsson S. Resistance in trees to insects - an overview of mechanisms and interactions. In: Wagner M.R., et al. (Ed). Mechanisms and Deployment of Resistance in Trees to Insects (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers 1-29
4. Hilker M., and Meiners T. Induction of plant responses towards oviposition and feeding of herbivorous arthropods: a comparison. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 104 (2002) 181-192
5. Kidd N.A.C., and Jervis M.A. The impact of parasitoids and predators on forest insect populations. In: Watt A.D., et al. (Ed). Forest and Insects (1997), Chapman & Hall 49-68
6. Hunter M.D. Effects of plant quality on the population ecology of parasitoids. Agr. For. Entomol. 5 (2003) 1-8
7. Raffa K.F., et al. Interactions among conifer terpenoids and bark beetles across multiple levels of scale: an attempt to understand links between population patterns and physiological processes. In: Romeo J. (Ed). Chemical Ecology and Phytochemistry of Forest Ecosystems (2005), Elsevier 79-118
8. Trapp S., and Croteau R. Defensive resin biosynthesis in conifers. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52 (2001) 589-724
9. Trewhalla K.E., et al. Variation in the suitability of Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine) to feeding by three pine defoliators, Panolis flammea, Neodiprion sertifer, and Zeiraphea diniana. J. Appl. Entomol. 124 (2000) 11-17
10. Barre F., et al. Variation in the suitability of Pinus sylvestris to feeding by two defoliators, Diprion pini (Hym., Diprionidae) and Graellsia isabellae galliaegloria (Lep., Attacidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 127 (2003) 249-257
11. Dubey V.S., et al. An overview of the non-mevalonate pathway for terpenoid biosynthesis in plants. J. Biosci. 28 (2003) 637-646
12. Van Schie C.C.N., et al. Regulation of terpenoid and benzenoid production in flowers. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9 (2006) 203-208
13. Huber D.P.W., et al. Genomic hardwiring and phenotypic plasticity of terpenoid-based defenses in conifers. J. Chem. Ecol. 30 (2004) 2399-2418
14. Martin D., and Bohlmann J. Molecular biochemistry and genomics of terpenoid defenses in conifers. In: Romeo J. (Ed). Chemical Ecology and Phytochemistry of Forest Ecosystems (2005), Elsevier 29-56
15. Schmidt A., et al. Induced chemical defenses in conifers: biochemical and molecular approaches to studying their function. In: Romeo J. (Ed). Chemical Ecology and Phytochemistry of Forest Ecosystems (2005), Elsevier 1-28
16. Wink M., and Schimmer O. Modes of action of defensive secondary metabolites. In: Wink M. (Ed). Functions of Plant Secondary Metabolites and their Exploitation in Biotechnology (1999), Sheffield Academic Press 17-133
17. Codella Jr. S.G., and Raffa K.F. Individual and social components of wood ant response to conifer sawfly defence (Hymenoptera: Formicidae, Diprionidae). Anim. Behav. 52 (1996) 801-811
18. Eisner T., et al. Defensive use by an insect of a plant resin. Science 184 (1974) 996-999
19. Barre F., et al. Preference and performance of the sawfly Diprion pini on host and non-host plants of the genus Pinus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 102 (2002) 229-237
20. Pasquier-Barre F., et al. Oviposition preference and larval survival of Diprion pini on Scots pine clones in relation to foliage characteristics. Agr. For. Entomol. 2 (2000) 185-192
21. Pasquier-Barre F., et al. Relationship of Scots pine clone characteristics and water stress to hatching and larval performance of the sawfly Diprion pini (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Environ. Entomol. 30 (2001) 1-6
22. Chen Z., et al. The role of monoterpenes in resistance of Douglas fir to western spruce budworm defoliation. J. Chem. Ecol. 28 (2002) 897-920
23. Zou J., and Cates R.G. Effects of terpenes and phenolic and flavonoid glycosides from Douglas fir on western spruce budworm larval growth, pupal weight, and adult weight. J. Chem. Ecol. 23 (1997) 2313-2326
24. Larsson S., et al. Influence of plant quality on pine sawfly population dynamics. Oikos 89 (2000) 440-450
25. Saikkonen K., et al. Oviposition and larval performance of European pine sawfly in relation to irrigation, simulated acid rain and resin acid concentration in Scots pine. Oikos 74 (1995) 273-282
26. Björkman C., et al. Oviposition preferences in pine sawflies: a trade-off between larval growth and defence against natural enemies. Oikos 79 (1997) 45-52
27. Björkman C., and Gref R. Survival of pine sawflies in cocoon stage in relation to resin acid content of larval food. J. Chem. Ecol. 19 (1993) 2881-2890
28. Beckman C.H. Phenolic-storing cells: keys to programmed cell death and periderm formation in wilt disease resistance and in general defence responses in plants?. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 57 (2000) 101-110
29. Larsson S., et al. Weak responses of pine sawfly larvae to high needle flavonoid concentrations in Scots pine. J. Chem. Ecol. 18 (1992) 271-282
30. Schopf R., et al. As to the food quality of spruce needles for forest damaging insects. 18. Resorption of secondary plant metabolites by the sawfly Gilpinia hercyniae Htg. (Hym., Diprionidae). Z. Angew. Entomol. 93 (1982) 244-257
31. Hódar J.A., et al. Feast and famine: previous defoliation limiting survival of pine processionary caterpillar Thaumetopoea pityocampa in Scots pine Pinus sylvestris. Acta Oecol. 26 (2004) 203-210
32. Chen Z., et al. Variation in budburst phenology of Douglas-fir related to western spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Fitness. J. Econ. Entomol. 96 (2003) 377-387
33. Clancy K.M. Mechanisms of resistance in trees to defoliators. In: Wagner M.R., et al. (Ed). Mechanisms and Deployment of Resistance in Trees to Insects (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers 79-103
34. Vet L.E.M., and Dicke M. Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37 (1992) 141-172
35. Aukema B.H., and Raffa K.F. Selective manipulation of predators using pheromones: responses to frontalin and ipsdienol pheromone components of bark beetles in the Great Lakes region. Agr. For. Entomol. 7 (2005) 193-200
36. Erbilgin N., and Raffa K.F. Modulation of predator attraction to pheromones of two prey species by stereochemistry of plant volatiles. Oecologia 127 (2001) 444-453
37. Hilker M., et al. Kairomonal effects of sawfly sex pheromones on egg parasitoids. J. Chem. Ecol. 26 (2000) 2591-2601
38. Shepherd W.P., et al. Electrophysiological and olfactometer responses of two histerid predators to three pine bark beetle pheromones. J. Chem. Ecol. 31 (2005) 1101-1110
39. Miller D.R., et al. Dose and enantiospecific responses of white pine cone beetles, Conophthorus coniperda, to α-pinene in an eastern white pine seed orchard. J. Chem. Ecol. 29 (2003) 437-451
40. Erbilgin N., and Raffa K.F. Kairomonal range of generalist predators in specialized habitats: responses to multiple phloeophagous species emitting pheromones vs. host odors. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 99 (2001) 205-210
41. Miller D.R., et al. Dose-dependent pheromone responses of Ips pini, Orthotomicus latidens (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), and associates in stands of lodgepole pine. Environ. Entomol. 34 (2005) 591-597
42. Miller D.R., et al. Dose-dependent pheromone responses of mountain pine beetle in stands of lodgepole pine. Environ. Entomol. 34 (2005) 1019-1027
43. Seybold S.J., and Tittiger C. Biochemistry and molecular biology of de novo isoprenoid pheromone production in the Scolytidae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 48 (2003) 425-453
44. Aukema B.H., and Raffa K.F. Does aggregation benefit bark beetles by diluting predation? Links between a group-colonisation strategy and the absence of emergent multiple predator effects. Ecol. Entomol. 29 (2004) 129-138
45. Miller D.R., and Borden J.H. Dose-dependent and species-specific responses of pine bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to monoterpenes in association with pheromones. Can. Entomol. 132 (2000) 183-195
46. Miller D.R., and Borden J.H. Responses of Ips pini (Say), Pityogenes knechteli Swaine and associated beetles (Coleoptera) to host monoterpenes in stands of lodgepole pine. J. Entomol. Sci. 38 (2003) 602-611
47. Erbilgin N., et al. Effect of varying monoterpene concentrations on the response of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to its aggregation pheromone: implications for pest management and ecology of bark beetles. Agr. For. Entomol. 5 (2003) 269-274
48. Erbilgin N., and Raffa K.F. Opposing effects of host monoterpenes on responses by two sympatric species of bark beetles to their aggregation pheromones. J. Chem. Ecol. 26 (2000) 2527-2548
49. Pettersson E.M., et al. Odor perception in the bark beetle parasitoid Roptrocerus xylophagorum exposed to host associated volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 26 (2000) 2507-2525
50. Sullivan B.T., et al. Attraction of the bark beetle parasitoid Roptrocerus xylophagorum (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to host-associated olfactory cues. Environ. Entomol. 29 (2000) 1138-1151
51. Pettersson E.M. Volatiles from potential hosts of Rhopalicus tutela a bark beetle parasitoid. J. Chem. Ecol. 27 (2001) 2219-2231
52. Pettersson E.M., et al. Evidence for the importance of odour-perception in the parasitoid Rhopalicus tutela (Walker) (Hym., Pteromalidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 125 (2001) 293-301
53. Sullivan B.T., and Berisford C.W. Semiochemicals from fungal associates of bark beetles may mediate host location behavior of parasitoids. J. Chem. Ecol. 30 (2004) 703-717
54. Arimura G.I., et al. Herbivore-induced, indirect plant defences. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1734 (2005) 91-111
55. Hilker M., et al. Insect egg deposition induces Pinus to attract egg parasitoids. J. Exp. Biol. 205 (2002) 455-461
56. Mumm R., et al. Chemical analysis of volatiles emitted by Pinus sylvestris after induction by insect oviposition. J. Chem. Ecol. 29 (2003) 1235-1252
57. Mumm R., et al. Analysis of volatiles from black pine (Pinus nigra): significance of wounding and egg deposition by a herbivorous sawfly. Phytochemistry 65 (2004) 3221-3230
58. Mumm R., and Hilker M. The significance of background odour for an egg parasitoid to detect plants with host eggs. Chem. Senses 30 (2005) 337-343
59. Mumm R., et al. Choosy egg parasitoids: specificity of oviposition-induced pine volatiles exploited by an egg parasitoid of pine sawflies. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 115 (2005) 217-225
60. Hilker M., et al. Insect egg deposition induces defence responses in Pinus sylvestris: characterisation of the elicitor. J. Exp. Biol. 208 (2005) 1849-1854
61. Hilker, M. and Meiners, T. Early herbivore alert: insect eggs induce plant defence. J. Chem. Ecol. (in press)
62. Litvak M.E., and Monson R.K. Patterns of induced and constitutive monoterpene production in conifer needles in relation to insect herbivory. Oecologia 114 (1998) 531-540
63. Nykänen H., and Koricheva J. Damage induced changes in woody plants and their effects on insect herbivore performance: a meta-analysis. Oikos 104 (2004) 247-268
64. Pöykkö H., et al. Differential performance of two geometrids on previously defoliated Scots pine. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 42 (2005) 497-503
65. Roitto M., et al. Defoliation-induced responses in peroxidases, phenolics, and polyamines in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) needles. J. Chem. Ecol. 29 (2003) 1905-1918
66. Wallin K.F., and Raffa K.F. Altered constitutive and inducible phloem monoterpenes following natural defoliation of Jack pine: implications to host mediated interguild interactions and plant defense theories. J. Chem. Ecol. 25 (1999) 861-880
67. Wallin K.F., and Raffa K.F. Effects of folivory on subcortical plant defenses: can defense theories predict interguild processes?. Ecology 82 (2001) 1387-1400
68. Trewhalla K.E., et al. Insect induced resistance in lodgepole pine: effects on two pine feeding insects. J. Appl. Entomol. 121 (1997) 129-136
69. Smits A., and Larsson S. Effects of previous defoliation on pine looper performance. Agr. For. Entomol. 1 (1999) 19-26
70. Clancy K.M., et al. Foliar nutrients and induced susceptibility: genetic mechanisms of Douglas-fir resistance to western spruce budworm defoliation. Can. J. For. Res. 34 (2004) 939-949
71. Lyytikäinen P. Comparison of the effects of artificial and natural defoliation on the growth of diprionid sawflies on Scots pine foliage. J. Appl. Entomol. 114 (1992) 57-66
72. Niemelä P., et al. Defoliation of the Scots pine and performance of diprionid sawflies. J. Anim. Ecol. 60 (1991) 683-692
73. Raffa K.F., et al. Long-term effects of defoliation on red pine suitability to insects feeding on diverse plant tissues. Ecology 79 (1998) 2352-2364
74. De Moraes C.M., et al. Caterpillar-induced nocturnal plant volatiles repel conspecific females. Nature 410 (2001) 577-579
75. Kapari L., et al. Defoliating insect immune defense interacts with induced plant defense during a population outbreak. Ecology 87 (2006) 291-296
76. Ode P.J. Plant chemistry and natural enemy fitness: effects on herbivore and natural enemy interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51 (2006) 163-185
77. Gershenzon J. Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 20 (1994) 1281-1328
78. de Groot P., et al. Insect-pine interactions. In: Richardson D.M. (Ed). Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus (1998), Cambridge University Press 354-380
79. Cipollini D., et al. Costs of induced responses in plants. Basic Appl. Ecol. 4 (2003) 79-85
80. Dicke M., et al. Inducible indirect defence of plants: from mechanisms to ecological functions. Basic Appl. Ecol. 4 (2003) 27-42
81. Hoballah M.E.F., and Turlings T.C.J. Experimental evidence that plants under caterpillar attack may benefit from attracting parasitoids. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3 (2001) 553-565
82. Kessler A., and Baldwin I.T. Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 291 (2001) 2141-2144
83. Van Loon J.J.A., et al. Parasitoid-plant mutualism: parasitoid attack of herbivore increases plant reproduction. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 97 (2000) 219-227
84. Schröder R., et al. A plant notices insect egg deposition and changes its rate of photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 138 (2005) 470-477
85. Miller B., et al. Insect-induced conifer defense. White pine weevil and methyl jasmonate induce traumatic resinosis, de novo formed volatile emissions, and accumulation of terpenoid synthase and putative octadecanoid pathway transcripts in Sitka spruce. Plant Physiol. 137 (2005) 369-382