Systemic acquired resistance: the elusive signal(s)

Current Opinion in Plant Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 436-442

  Vlot, A Corina ^a,b   Klessig, Daniel F ^b   Park, Sang Wook ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PLANT BREEDING RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMMUNOLOGY; INNATE IMMUNITY; PLANT DISEASE; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

IMMUNITY, NATURAL; PLANT DISEASES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 48149104072     PISSN: 13695266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.05.003     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Pozo M.J., and Azcón-Aguilar C. Unraveling mycorrhiza-induced resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10 (2007) 393-398
2. Van Loon L.C. Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol 119 (2007) 243-254
3. Cameron R.K., Dixon R.A., and Lamb C.J. Biologically induced systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 5 (1994) 715-725
4. Mishina T.E., and Zeier J. Pathogen-associated molecular pattern recognition rather than development of tissue necrosis contributes to bacterial induction of systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant J 50 (2007) 500-513. This paper shows that virulent and non-host Pseudomonas-Arabidopsis interactions trigger a SAR response accompanied by systemic induction of SA and defense gene expression. As these responses were compromised in known SAR mutants, the authors concluded that the non HR-inducing bacteria induced true SAR. Localized application of PAMPs, including flg22, triggered very limited local and systemic induction of SA and defense gene expression, but nonetheless induced a state of significantly heightened resistance to virulent P. syringae in the systemic tissue.
5. Griebel T., and Zeier J. Light regulation and daytime dependency of inducible plant defences in Arabidopsis: phytochrome signalling controls systemic acquired resistance rather than local defence. Plant Physiol 50 (2008) 500-513. Data in this paper show that the development of both a visible HR and SAR correlates with the length of time that plants receive light immediately following infection of Arabidopsis with avirulent P. syringae. End-of-day inoculations resulted in delayed PR-1 induction and compromised SA accumulation in inoculated leaves as compared to start-of-day inoculations. The photoreceptor mutants cry1cry2, phot1phot2, and phyAphyB all displayed normal local defense responses, although SA accumulation and defense against virulent P. syringae might be partially compromised in the phyAphyB mutant. Contrary to wt-like SAR in cry1cry2 and phot1phot2 plants, SAR was completely abolished in the phyAphyB mutant.
6. Vernooij B., Friedrich L., Morse A., Reist R., Kolditz-Jawhar R., Ward E., Uknes S., Kessmann H., and Ryals J. Salicylic acid is not the translocated signal responsible for inducing systemic acquired resistance but is required in signal transduction. Plant Cell 6 (1994) 959-965
7. Park S.-W., Kaimoyo E., Kumar D., Mosher S., and Klessig D.F. Methyl salicylate is a critical mobile signal for plant systemic acquired resistance. Science 318 (2007) 113-116. Grafting experiments showed that the tobacco MeSA esterase SABP2 is required in the signal-perceiving/processing tissue, but not in the signal-generating tissue, to trigger SAR. The SAR-deficient phenotype of SABP2-silenced graft scions was complemented by expression of SABP2, but only if it was capable of converting MeSA to SA. Feedback inhibition of the MeSA esterase activity of SABP2 [8] in the signal-generating tissue is of biological significance as expression of a form of SABP2 with uninhibitable MeSA esterase activity in the graft rootstock abolished SAR. Silencing of the gene encoding a SA methyl transferase, SAMT1, similarly abolished SAR signal generation in graft rootstocks. Increases in MeSA levels in TMV-inoculated and systemic tissues, as well as in petiole (phloem) exudates of infected leaves, paralleled the development of SAR.
8. Forouhar F., Yang Y., Kumar D., Chen Y., Fridman E., Park S.-W., Chiang Y., Acton T.B., Montelione G.T., Pichersky E., et al. Structural and biochemical studies identify tobacco SABP2 as a methyl salicylate esterase and implicate it in plant innate immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 (2005) 1773-1778
9. Koo Y.J., Kim M.A., Kim E.H., Song J.T., Jung C., Moon J.-K., Kim J.-H., Seo H.S., Song S.I., Kim J.-K., et al. Overexpression of salicylic acid carboxyl methyltransferase reduces salicylic acid-mediated pathogen resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol 64 (2007) 1-15. A rice carboxyl methyl transferase for SA and benzoic acid, OsBSMT1, was expressed in Arabidopsis. Since the transgenic plants accumulated elevated levels of MeSA and methyl benzoate, particularly in response to pathogen infection, but did not mount a significant defense response to pathogen infection or when treated with SA, the data confirm earlier findings that MeSA is not biologically active in defense [10]. Expression of PR-1 was induced in both wild type plants and in SA-deficient sid2-2 mutants when they were maintained in a container with OsBSMT1-over expressing plants that were treated with SA. Together, the data strengthen earlier findings that MeSA can act as an airborne, plant-to-plant defense signal that is converted to SA in the signal-perceiving plant [11].
10. Seskar M., Shulaev V., and Raskin I. Endogenous methyl salicylate in pathogen-inoculated tobacco plants. Plant Physiol 116 (1998) 387-392
11. Shulaev V., Silverman P., and Raskin I. Airborne signaling by methyl salicylate in plant pathogen resistance. Nature 385 (1997) 718-721
12. Maldonado A.M., Doerner P., Dixon R.A., Lamb C.J., and Cameron R.K. A putative lipid transfer protein involved in systemic resistance signalling in Arabidopsis. Nature 419 (2002) 399-403
13. Chaturvedi R., Krothapalli K., Makandar R., Nandi A., Sparks A.A., Roth M.R., Welti R., and Shah J. Plastid ω3-fatty acid desaturase-dependent accumulation of a systemic acquired resistance inducing activity in petiole exudates of Arabidopsis thaliana is independent of jasmonic acid. Plant J 54 (2008) 106-117. In addition to a mutation in the previously published SFD1 gene (SUPPRESSOR OF FATTY ACID DESATURASE 1) [14], mutations in three other genes involved in chloroplast galactolipid metabolism, FAD7 (FATTY ACID DESATURASE 7), MGD1 (MONOGALACTOSYLDIACYLGLYCEROL SYNTHASE 1), and SFD2, abolished SAR without affecting basal resistance or the accumulation of SA in leaves infected with avirulent P. syringae. Petiole exudates from leaves of sfd1 or fad7 Arabidopsis infected with avirulent P. syringae failed to induce defense gene expression or pathogen resistance in Arabidopsis, tomato, and/or wheat, unlike those from comparable wild type plants. As defense signaling was restored by combining these petiole exudates with similar exudates from dir1 mutant plants, which lack a functional form of the lipid-transfer protein DIR1 and also do not generate or transmit the SAR signal [12], it was concluded that a glycerolipid-derived factor and DIR1 may interact or act in parallel to trigger SAR. The glycerolipid-derived factor did not co-elute with JA from a gel filtration column, and JA did not restore the defense signaling potential of petiole exudates from infected sfd1 or fad7 mutant plants, indicating that the glycerolipid-derived SAR signal is not JA.
14. Nandi A., Welti R., and Shah J. The Arabidopsis thaliana dihydroxyacetone phosphate reductase gene SUPPRESSOR OF FATTY ACID DESATURASE DEFICIENCY 1 is required for glycerolipid metabolism and for the activation of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 16 (2004) 465-477
15. Truman W., Bennett M.H., Kubigsteltig I., Turnbull C., and Grant M. Arabidopsis systemic immunity uses conserved defense signaling pathways and is mediated by jasmonates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 (2007) 1075-1080. A previously identified early PAMP-induced gene was transiently induced in systemic Arabidopsis tissues, peaking at around four hours after a localized infection of the plant with avirulent P. syringae. This observation was followed up with micro array analyses of systemic tissue of SAR-induced plants at four hours after infection. Genes of the phenylpropanoid pathway were strongly induced, and the authors suggested that phenolic compound-related defenses were primed. However, most of the systemically upregulated genes had roles in JA biosynthesis or had previously been characterized as JA responsive. JA was found in petiole exudates of infected leaves, and the JA biosynthetic mutant opr3 and the JA-insensitive mutant jin1 were SAR deficient. JA may therefore function as an early mobile signal triggering SAR, and the authors hypothesized that JA and SA might both affect SAR in a temporally or spatially separated manner.
16. Buhot N., Gomes E., Milat M.L., Ponchet M., Marion D., Lequeu J., Delrot S., Coutos-Thevenot P., and Blein J.P. Modulation of the biological activity of a tobacco LTP1 by lipid complexation. Mol Biol Cell 15 (2004) 5047-5052
17. Grant M., and Lamb C. Systemic immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9 (2006) 414-420
18. Cui J., Bahrami A.K., Pringle E.G., Hernandez-Guzman G., Bender C.L., Pierce N.E., and Ausubel F.M. Pseudomonas syringae manipulates systemic plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 (2005) 1791-1796
19. Andersson M.X., Hamberg M., Kourtchenkova O., Brunnström A., McPhail K.L., Gerwick W.H., Göbel C., Feussner I., and Ellerström M. Oxylipin profiling of the hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis thaliana; formation of a novel oxo-phytodienoic acid-containing galactolipid, arabidopside E. J Biol Chem 281 (2006) 31528-31537
20. Buseman C.M., Tamura P., Sparks A.A., Baughman E.J., Maatta S., Zhao J., Roth M.R., Esch S.W., Shah J., Williams T.D., et al. Wounding stimulates the accumulation of glycerolipids containing oxophytodienoic acid and dinor-oxophytodienoic acid in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol 142 (2006) 28-39
21. Kourtchenko O., Andersson M.X., Hamberg M., Brunnström A., Göbel C., McPhail K.L., Gerwick W.H., Feussner I., and Ellerström M. Oxo-phytodienoic acid-containing galactolipids in Arabidopsis: jasmonate signaling dependence. Plant Physiol 145 (2007) 1658-1669
22. Mur L.A.J., Kenton P., Atzorn R., Miersch O., and Wasternack C. The outcomes of concentration-specific interactions between salicylate and jasmonate signaling include synergy, antagonism, and oxidative stress leading to cell death. Plant Physiol 140 (2006) 249-262
23. Ament K., Kant M.R., Sabelis M.W., Haring M.A., and Schuurink R.C. Jasmonic acid is a key regulator of spider mite-induced volatile terpenoid and methyl salicylate emission in tomato. Plant Physiol 135 (2004) 2025-2037
24. Chen F., D'Auria J.C., Tholl D., Ross J.R., Gershenzon J., Noel J.P., and Pichersky E. An Arabidopsis thaliana gene for methylsalicylate biosynthesis, identified by a biochemical genomics approach, has a role in defense. Plant J 36 (2003) 577-588
25. De Vos M., Van Oosten V.R., Van Poecke R.M.P., Van Pelt J.A., Pozo M.J., Mueller M.J., Buchala A.J., Métraux J.-P., Van Loon L.C., Dicke M., and Pieterse C.M.J. Signal signature and transcriptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 18 (2005) 923-937
26. Xia Y., Suzuki H., Borevitz J., Blount J., Guo Z., Patel K., Dixon R.A., and Lamb C. An extracellular aspartic protease functions in Arabidopsis disease resistance signalling. EMBO J 23 (2004) 980-988
27. 2, JA-dependent defense gene expression, and expression of the gene encoding its own precursor, PROPEP1. PROPEP1 was also induced by MeJA, indicating the existence of a positive feedback loop. Together with five homologues, PROPEP1 makes up a small gene family, with PROPEP2 and 3 being strongly activated by pathogens which are capable of inducing SAR. Over expression of PROPEP1 in Arabidopsis induced resistance to the soil-borne fungal pathogen Pythium irregulare.
28. •] was also seen here as AtPep1 and 2 strongly induced expression of the JA-responsive PDF1.2 gene, and AtPep1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 strongly activated expression of the SA-responsive PR-1 gene. Since PAMPs, such as flg22, induce PROPEP2 and 3, the authors proposed that the PROPEP gene family is involved in defense signaling by establishing a positive feedback loop.
29. Ryan C.A., Huffaker A., and Yamaguchi Y. New insights into innate immunity in Arabidopsis. Cell Microbiol 9 (2007) 1902-1908
30. 125I-AtPep1. The association of PEPR1 with the cell surface strongly argues for a role of the AtPeps in cell-to-cell defense signaling.
31. Durner J., and Klessig D.F. Nitric oxide as a signal in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2 (1999) 369-374
32. Rustérucci C., Espunya M.C., Díaz M., Chabannes M., and Martínez M.C. S-nitrosoglutathione reductase affords protection against pathogens in Arabidopsis, both locally and systemically. Plant Physiol 143 (2007) 1282-1292. The level of S-nitrosothiols (SNOs) was manipulated by over and under expression of S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR). A 45% reduction of GSNOR activity resulted in approximately a twofold increase of SNOs, while over expression of GSNOR activity by 19-fold reduced SNO levels by 20%. SAR correlated with elevated levels of SNOs in both the infected and systemic tissues of wild type plants, and this induction was not observed in the GSNOR over expressor. Depending on the pathogen used, basal resistance was enhanced in the GSNOR-silenced line. The slight reduction of the SNO level in the GSNOR over expressor did not significantly affect basal or R gene-mediated resistance, but severely compromised SAR.
33. Espunya M.C., Díaz M., Moreno-Romero J., and Martínez M.C. Modification of intracellular levels of glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase alters glutathione homeostasis and root development. Plant Cell Environ 29 (2006) 1002-1011
34. Gaupels F., Furch A.C., Will T., Mur L.A., Kogel K.H., and van Bel A.J. Nitric oxide generation in Vicia faba phloem cells reveals them to be sensitive detectors as well as possible systemic transducers of stress signals. New Phytol 178 (2008) 634-646
35. Feechan A., Kwon E., Yun B.-W., Wang Y., Pallas J.A., and Loake G.J. A central role for S-nitrosothiols in plant disease resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 (2005) 8054-8059
36. Zhang X., Dai Y., Xiong Y., DeFraia C., Li J., Dong X., and Mou Z. Overexpression of Arabidopsis MAP kinase kinase 7 leads to activation of plant basal and systemic acquired resistance. Plant J 52 (2007) 1066-1079. Arabidopsis over expressing MKK7 displayed constitutive accumulation of SA and SA-related defense gene transcripts, as well as enhanced resistance to pathogens. These phenotypes depended on the kinase activity of MKK7 as they did not occur in plants over expressing a kinase-inactive mutant. Analysis of MKK7::GUS reporter lines showed that MKK7 is expressed exclusively in the veins of leaves that have been infected with avirulent P. syringae. Interestingly, conditional expression of MKK7 from a dexamethasone-inducible transgene triggered defense gene expression and pathogen resistance in systemic non-MKK7 expressing tissues. Together, the data strongly argue that the MKK7 kinase is involved in SAR signal generation and/or transmission.
37. Petersen M., Brodersen P., Naested H., Andreasson E., Lindhart U., Johansen B., Nielsen H.B., Lacy M., Austin M.J., Parker J.E., et al. Arabidopsis MAP kinase 4 negatively regulates systemic acquired resistance. Cell 103 (2000) 1111-1120
38. Brodersen P., Petersen M., Nielsen H.B., Zhu S., Newman M.-A., Shokat K.M., Rietz S., Parker J., and Mundy J. Arabidopsis MAP kinase 4 regulates salicylic acid- and jasmonic acid/ethylene-dependent responses via EDS1 and PAD4. Plant J 47 (2006) 532-546
39. Ichimura K., Casais C., Peck S.C., Shinozaki K., and Shirasu K. MEKK1 is required for MPK4 activation and regulates tissue-specific and temperature-dependent cell death in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 281 (2006) 36969-36976
40. Suarez-Rodriguez M.C., Adams-Phillips L., Liu Y., Wang H., Su S.-H., Jester P.J., Zhang S., Bent A.F., and Krysan P.J. MEKK1 is required for flg22-induced MPK4 activation a Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol 143 (2007) 661-669
41. Zipfel C., Robatzek S., Navarro L., Oakeley E.J., Jones J.D.G., Felix G., and Boller T. Bacterial disease resistance in Arabidopsis through flagellin perception. Nature 428 (2004) 764-767
42. Loake G., and Grant M. Salicylic acid in plant defence - the players and protagonists. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10 (2007) 466-472
43. Dong X. NPR1, all things considered. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7 (2004) 547-552
44. Robert-Seilaniantz A., Navarro L., Bari R., and Jones J.D.G. Pathological hormone imbalances. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10 (2007) 372-379
45. Wang D., Pajerowska-Mukhtar K., Hendrickson Culler A., and Dong X. Salicylic acid inhibits pathogen growth in plants through repression of the auxin signaling pathway. Curr Biol 17 (2007) 1784-1790. Micro array analyses showed that the SA analog BTH induces several auxin-conjugating enzymes and represses a large group of auxin-response genes, most of which are also repressed in systemic tissues of SAR-induced plants. These transcriptional changes were not paralleled by changes in auxin levels. The morphological phenotypes of an auxin over producing mutant were compromised by introducing mutations which cause constitutive SA signaling, although auxin levels remained high. Reporter gene studies confirmed that SA antagonizes auxin signaling (rather than its metabolism) via SA-dependent stabilization of auxin repressor proteins. By contrast, application of an auxin enhanced susceptibility of Arabidopsis to pathogens whereas an auxin-insensitive mutant displayed enhanced resistance to P. syringae. Since insensitivity to auxin partially rescued the hypersusceptible phenotype of Arabidopsis expressing the SA-degrading enzyme encoded by NahG, the authors concluded that SA enhances resistance by inhibiting auxin signaling.
46. Jagadeeswaran G., Raina S., Acharya B.R., Maqbool S.B., Mosher S.L., Appel H.M., Schultz J.C., Klessig D.F., and Raina R. Arabidopsis GH3-LIKE DEFENSE GENE 1 is required for accumulation of salicylic acid, activation of defense responses and resistance to Pseudomonas syringae. Plant J 51 (2007) 234-246
47. Lee M.W., Lu H., Jung H.W., and Greenberg J.T. A key role for the Arabidopsis WIN3 protein in disease resistance triggered by Pseudomonas syringae that secrete AvrRpt2. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20 (2007) 1192-1200
48. Nobuta K., Okrent R.A., Stoutemyer M., Rodibaugh N., Kempema L., Wildermuth M.C., and Innes R.W. The GH3 acyl adenylase family member PBS3 regulates salicylic acid-dependent defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 144 (2007) 1144-1156
49. Park J.-E., Park J.-Y., Kim Y.-S., Staswick P.E., Jeon J., Yun J., Kim S.-Y., Kim J., Lee Y.-H., and Park C.-M. GH3-mediated auxin homeostasis links growth regulation with stress adaptation response in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 282 (2007) 10036-10046
50. Zhang Z., Li Q., Li Z., Staswick P.E., Wang M., Zhu Y., and He Z. Dual regulation role of GH3.5 in salicylic acid and auxin signaling during Arabidopsis-Pseudomonas syringae interaction. Plant Physiol 145 (2007) 450-464. GH3.5 can conjugate auxin and SA [51], and over expression of GH3.5 resulted in elevated auxin and SA levels after pathogen infection of Arabidopsis. In spite of enhanced SA levels, R gene-mediated resistance was compromised in the GH3.5 over expressor. A comparison of this disease resistance phenotype with that of Arabidopsis over expressing the closest homolog of GH3.5, GH3.6, which can only conjugate auxin and not SA, argued that elevated auxin levels likely antagonized SA signaling, which resulted in increased susceptibility. Basal and R gene-mediated resistance were not affected in the gh3.5 knock out mutant, but SAR was slightly compromised, which was accompanied by reduced systemic induction of PR-1. GH3.5 expression was induced by pathogens and SA, and transcript profiling of the GH3.5 over expressor revealed that GH3.5 might enhance IAA biosynthesis and activate auxin signaling. Expression of SA-dependent and other defense genes was also higher in the over expressor than in wild type plants, particularly after pathogen infection.
51. Staswick P.E., Serban B., Rowe M., Tiryaki I., Maldonado M.T., Maldonado M.C., and Suza W. Characterization of an Arabidopsis enzyme family that conjugates amino acids to indole-3-acetic acid. Plant Cell 17 (2005) 616-627
52. Traw M.B., Kniskern J.M., and Bergelson J. SAR increases fitness of Arabidopsis thaliana in the presence of natural bacterial pathogens. Evolution 61 (2007) 2444-2449
53. Heidel A.J., and Dong X. Fitness benefits of systemic acquired resistance during Hyaloperonospora parasitica infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 173 (2006) 1621-1628
54. Van Hulten M., Pelser M., Van Loon L.C., Pieterse C.M.J., and Ton J. Costs and benefits of priming for defense in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103 (2006) 5602-5607. This paper directly compares the effects of low and high concentrations of the defense-inducing compounds β-aminobutyric acid (BABA) and the SA analog BTH on pathogen resistance and plant growth/yield. Low concentrations of the compounds induced SAR-like priming of defense pathways that were activated faster and/or stronger than in non-treated plants upon pathogen infection. Higher concentrations of the compounds constitutively activated defense. The data show that defense through priming is equally effective as constitutively activated defense. However, contrary to constitutive activation of defense, priming did not cause significant plant growth retardation or loss of seed production. As plant growth and seed production were not affected in npr1 mutant plants after pathogen infection or treatment with high concentrations of BABA or BTH, it was concluded that the 'costs' of infection/constitutive defense were owing to NPR1-dependent defense responses.
55. Choi Y.H., Kim H.K., Linthorst H.J.M., Hollander J.G., Lefeber A.W.M., Erkelens C., Nuzillard J.-M., and Verpoorte R. NMR metabolomics to revisit the tobacco mosaic virus infection in Nicotiana tabacum leaves. J Nat Prod 69 (2006) 742-748