Perceiving parts and shapes from concave surfaces

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 153-167

  Cate, Anthony D ^a   Behrmann, Marlene ^b  

^a VA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77949331522     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/72.1.153     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. BARENHOLTZ, E., COHEN, E. H., FELDMAN, J., & SINGH, M. (2003). Detection of change in shape: An advantage for concavities. Cognition, 89, 1-9
2. BARENHOLTZ, E., & FELDMAN, J. (2003). Visual comparisons within and between object parts: Evidence for a single-part superiority effect Vision Research, 43, 1655-1666
3. BAYLIS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470
4. BEHRMANN, M., & KIMCHI, R. (2003). What does visual agnosia tell us about perceptual organization and its relationship to object perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 19-42
5. BERTAMINI, M., & CROUCHER, C. J. (2003). The shape of holes. Cognition, 87, 33-54
6. BERTAMINI, M., & FARRANT, T. (2005). Detection of change in shape and its relation to part structure. Acta Psychologica, 120, 35-54
7. BERTAMINI, M., & LAWSON, R. (2006). Visual search for a circular region perceived as a figure versus as a hole: Evidence of the importance of part structure. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 776-791
8. BIEDERMAN, I., & GERHARDSTEIN, P. C (1993). Recognizing depthrotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1162-1182
9. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436
10. CASATI, R., & VARZI, A. C. (1994). Holes and other superficialities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
11. COHEN, E. H., BARENHOLTZ, E., SINGH, M., & FELDMAN, J. (2005). What change detection tells us about the visual representation of shape. Journal of Vision, 5(4, Art. 3), 313-321. doi:10.1167/5.4.
12. EGLY, R., DRIVER, J., & RAFAL, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177
13. ENNS, J. T., & RENSINK, R. A. (1990). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science, 247, 721-723
14. ENNS, J. T., & RENSINK, R. A. (1991). Preattentive recovery of threedimensional orientation from line drawings. Psychological Review, 98, 335-351
15. FARAH, M. J. (1992). Agnosia. Current Opinion In Neurobiology, 2, 162-164
16. GARNER, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum
17. GOODALE, M. A., & MILNER, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25
18. GOODALE, M. A., MILNER, A. D., JAKOBSON, L. S., & CAREY, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154-156
19. GRILL-SPECTOR, K., KOURTZI, Z., & KANWISHER, N. (2001 ). The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Research, 41, 1409-1422
20. HILL, H., & BRUCE, V. (1993). Independent effects of lighting, orientation, and stereopsis on the hollow-face illusion. Perception, 22, 887-897
21. HILL, H., & BRUCE, V. (1994). A comparison between the hollow-face and 'hollow-potato' illusions. Perception, 23, 1335-1337
22. HILL, H., & BRUCE, V. (1996). Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 986-1004
23. HOFFMAN, D. D., & RICHARDS, W. A. (1984). Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65-96
24. HUMPHREY, G. K., GOODALE, M. A., BOWEN, C. V., GATI, J. S., VILIS, T., RUTT, B. K., & MENON, R. S. (1997). Differences in perceived shape from shading correlate with activity in early visual areas. Current Biology, 7, 144-147
25. HUMPHREY, G. K., SYMONS, L. A., HERBERT, A. M., & GOODALE, M. A. (1996). A neurological dissociation between shape from shading and shape from edges. Behavioral Brain Research, 76, 117-125
26. KANIZSA, G., & GERBINO, W. (1976). Convexity and symmetry in figure-ground organization. In M. Henle (Ed.), Vision and artifact (pp. 25-32). New York: Springer
27. KLEFFNER, D. A., & RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. ( 1992). On the perception of shape from shading Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 18-36
28. KOURTZI, Z., ERB, M., GRODD, W., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (2003). Representation of the perceived 3-D object shape in the human lateral occipital complex. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 911-920
29. KRAMER, A. F., & JACOBSON, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-284
30. KRÓLICZAK, G., HEARD, P., GOODALE, M. A., & GREGORY, R. L. (2006). Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion. Brain Research, 1080, 9-16
31. LAMY, D., LEBER, A., & EGETH, H. E. (2004). Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception A Performance, 30, 1019-1031
32. LAVIE, N., & DRIVER, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection. Perception A Psychophysics, 58, 1238-1251
33. LEDERMAN, S. J., KLATZKY, R. L., & REED, C. L. ( 1993). Constraints on haptic integration of spatially shared object dimensions. Perception, 22, 723-743
34. LEE, T. S., YANG, C. F., ROMERO, R. D., & MUMFORD, D. (2002). Neural activity in early visual cortex reflects behavioral experience and higher-order perceptual saliency. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 589-597
35. LIU, B., & TODD, J. T. (2004). Perceptual biases in the interpretation of 3-D shape from shading. Vision Research, 44, 2135-2145
36. LIU, Z., JACOBS, D. W., & BASRI, R. (1999). The role of convexity in perceptual completion: Beyond good continuation. Vision Research, 39, 4244-4257
37. LOGOTHETIS, N. K., & SHEINBERG, D. L. (1996). Visual object recognition. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 577-621
38. MALACH, R., REPPAS, J. B., BENSON, R. R., KWONG, K. K., JIANG, H., KENNEDY, W. A., ET AL. (1995). Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92, 8135-8139
39. NELSON, R., & PALMER, S. E. (2001). Of holes and wholes: The perception of surrounded regions. Perception, 30, 1213-1226
40. PALMER, S. E., BROOKS, J. L., & NELSON, R. (2003). When does grouping happen? Acta Psychologica, 114, 311-330
41. PALMER, S. [E.], DAVIS, J., NELSON, R, & ROCK, I. (2008). Figureground effects on shape memory for objects versus holes. Perception, 37, 1569-1586
42. PELLI, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442
43. PETERSON, M. A., DE GELDER, B., RAPCSAK, S. Z., GERHARDSTEIN, P. C., & BACHOUD-LÉVI, A. (2000). Object memory effects on figure assignment: Conscious object recognition is not necessary or sufficient Vision Research, 40, 1549-1567
44. PETERSON, M. A., & GIBSON, B. S. (1994). Object recognition contributions to figure-ground organization: Operations on outlines and subjective contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 551-564
45. PETERSON, M. A., HARVEY, E. M., & WEIDENBACHER, H. J. (1991). Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground reversal: Which route counts? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 1075-1089
46. SIDDIQI, K., TRESNESS, K. J., & KIMIA, B. B. (1996). Parts of visual form: Psychophysical aspects. Perception, 25, 399-424
47. SINGH, M., SEYRANIAN, G. D., & HOFFMAN, D. D. ( 1999). Parsing silhouettes: The short-cut rule. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 636-660
48. STEVENS, K. A., & BROOKES, A. (1988). The concave cusp as a determiner of figure-ground. Perception, 17, 35-42
49. SUBIRANA-VILANOVA, J. B., & RICHARDS, W. ( 1996). Attentional frames, frame curves and figural boundaries: The inside/outside dilemma. Vision Research, 36, 1493-1501
50. SUN, J., & PERONA, P. (1998). Where is the sun? Nature Neuroscience, 1, 183-184
51. TAIRA, M., NOSE, L, INOUE, K., & TSUTSUI, K. (2001). Cortical areas related to attention to 3-D surface structures based on shading: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 14, 959-966
52. TANAKA, K. (1996). Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 109-139
53. TARR, M. J., WILLIAMS, P., HAYWARD, W. G., & GAUTHIER, I. (1998). Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent Nature Neuroscience, 1, 275-277
54. THEEUWES, J., DE VRIES, G.-J., & GODIJN, R. (2003). Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 735-746
55. TREISMAN, A., & SOUTHER, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 285-310
56. UNGERLEIDER, L. G., GALKIN, T. W., & MISHKIN, M. ( 1983). Visuotopic organization of projections from striate cortex to inferior and lateral pulvinar in rhesus monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 217, 137-157
57. VALYEAR, K. F., CULHAM, J. C., SHARIF, N., WESTWOOD, D., & GOODALE, M. A. (2006). A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: A human fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 44, 218-228
58. VECERA, S. P., BEHRMANN, M., & FILAPEK, J. C. (2001). Attending to the parts of a single object: Part-based selection limitations. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 308-321
59. VECERA, S. P., BEHRMANN, M., & MCGOLDRICK, J. (2000). Selective attention to the parts of an object Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 301-308