Cuing the dimension of a distractor: Verbal cues of target identity also benefit same-dimension distractor singletons

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 118-124

  Meeter, Martijn ^a   Theeuwes, Jan ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745849635     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193822     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. EGETH, H. E., VIRZI, R. A., & GARBART, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 32-39.
2. EYSEL, U. T., MUCHE, T., & WORGOTTER, F. (1988). Lateral interactions at direction-selective striate neurones in the cat demonstrated by local cortical inactivation. Journal of Physiology, 399, 657-675.
3. FOUND, A., & MÜLLER, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a "dimensionweighting" account. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 88-101.
4. KAPTEIN, N. A., THEEUWES, J., & VAN DER HEUDEN, A. H. C. (1995). Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1053-1069.
5. KRUMMENACHER, J., MÜLLER, H. J., & HELLER, D. (2001). Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Evidence for parallel-coactive processing of dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 901-917.
6. LIU, T., SLOTNICK, S. D., SERENCES, J. T., & YANTIS, S. (2003). Cortical mechanisms of feature-based attentional control. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 1334-1343.
7. MAUKOVIC, V., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672.
8. MALJKOVIC, V., & NAKAYAMA, K. (2000). Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7, 571-595.
9. MÜLLER, H. J., HELLER, D., & ZIEGLER, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1-17.
10. MÜLLER, H. J., REIMANN, B., & KRUMMENACHER, J. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulusand expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 1021-1035.
11. NAVALPAKKAM, V., & ITTI, L. (2005). Modeling the influence of task on attention. Vision Research, 45, 205-231.
12. ROE, A. W., & Ts'o, D. Y. (1995). Visual topography in primate V2: Multiple representation across functional stripes. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 3689-3715.
13. SHULMAN, G. L., D'AVOSSA, G., TANSY, A. P., & CORBETTA, M. (2002). Two attentional processes in the parietal lobe. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1124-1131.
14. THEEUWES, J., REIMANN, B., & MORTIER, K. (in press). Visual search for featural singletons: No top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming. Visual Cognition.
15. TREISMAN, A. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Me morial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
16. TREISMAN, A. (1991). Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 652-676.
17. WINER, B. J., BROWN, D. R., & MICHELS, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
19. WOLFE. J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13-73). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
20. WOLFE, J. M., BUTCHER, S. J., LEE, C., & HYLE, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 483-502.