"Drawing is a frame of mind": An evaluation of students' perceptions about reading instruction within a response to intervention model

Literacy Research and Instruction

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 113-128

  Chapman, Lauren ^a   Greenfield, Renée ^a   Rinaldi, Claudia ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Drawings; Education research; Elementary education; Literacy; Special education; Student perceptions; Teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949316878     PISSN: 19388071     EISSN: 19388063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19388070902842694     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Albert, L., Rhoades, K., &Bowen, C. (2008). Images and drawings: A study of prospective teachers' perceptions of teaching and learning mathematics. Unpublished manuscript.
2. Baghban, M. (2007). Scribbles, labels and stories: The role of drawing in the development of writing. Young Children, 62(1), 20-26.
3. Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researchers, 31(8), 18-20.
4. Burns, M.K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2006). Using response to intervention to assess learning disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32(1), 3-5.
5. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
6. Cox, S. (2005). Intention and meaning in young children's drawings. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 24(2), 115-125.
7. Dahl, K. L., & Freppon, P. A. (1995). A comparison of innercity children's interpretations of reading and writing instruction in the early grades in skills-based and whole language classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(1), 50-74.
8. Darling, K. D. (2004). Uncovering the history of children's drawing and art. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
9. Dickinson, D., & Neuman, S. (2006). Handbook of early literacy research: Volume 2 (1st ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
10. Elbaum, B. E., Schumm, J. S., & Vaughn, S. (1997). Urban middle-elementary students' perceptions of grouping formats for reading instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97(5), 475-500.
11. Fleiss, J. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 378-382.
12. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71, 7-22.
13. Gee, J. (1992). Socio-cultural approaches to literacy (literacies). Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 31-48.
14. Haney, W., Russell, M., & Bebell, D. (2004). Drawing on Education: Using Drawings to Document Schooling and Support Change. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 241-272.
15. Hsu, L., & Field, R. (2003). Interrater agreement measures: Comments on Kappan, Cohen's Kappa, Scott's p, and Aickin's a. Understanding Statistics, 2(3), 205-219.
16. Klinger, J. K., & Edwards, P. A. (2006). Cultural considerations with Response to Intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 108-117.
17. Kvalseth, T. O. (1991). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales: An asymmetric version of Kappa. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(1), 95-101.
18. Lifford, J., Byron, B., Eckblad, J., & Ziemian, C. (2000). Reading, responding, reflecting. English Journal, 89(4), 46-57.
19. Link, C. R., & Ratledge, E. C. (1979). Student perceptions, I.Q. and achievement. The Journal of Human Resources, 14(1), 98-111.
20. Lockheed, M. E., & Harris, A. M. (1984). Cross-sex collaborative learning in elementary classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 275-294.
21. McKenna, M. C., & Kear, D. J. (1990). Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers. Reading Teacher, 629-639.
22. McKenna, M. C., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 934-956.
23. Meltzer, L., Katzir-Cohen, T., Miller, L., & Roditi, B. (2001). The impact of effort and strategy use on academic performance: Student and teacher perceptions. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24(2), 85-98.
24. Moats, L. C. (2001). Overcoming the language gap. American Educator, 25(5), 8-9.
25. Overton, T. (2003). Assessing learners with special needs: An applied approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
26. Pflaum, S. W., & Bishop, P. A. (2004). Student perceptions of reading engagement: Learning from the learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(3), 202-213.
27. Rinaldi, C., & Samson, J. (2008). English language learners and response to intervention: Refferal recommendations. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(5), 6-14.
28. Shirley, D., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). Data-driven to destraction. Education Week, 26(4), 32-33.
29. United States Congress. (2001). No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, P.L. 107-110, Section 3122(b)(4).
30. Walker-Dalhouse, D., & Risko, V. J. (2008). Learning from literacy success in high-achieving urban schools. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 422-424.
31. Weber, S., & Mitchell, C. (1995). That's funny, you don't look like a teacher: Interrogating images and identity in popular culture. Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press.
32. Wilson, G. L., & Michaels, C. A. (2006). General and special education students' perceptions of co-teaching: Implications for secondary-level literacy instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22, 2005-225.
33. Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
34. Worthy, J., Moorman, M., & Turner, M. (1999). What Johnny likes to read is hard to find in school. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(1), 12-27.