Surface radical chain reaction revisited: Comparative investigation of styrene and 2,4-dimethyl-styrene on hydrogenated Si(001) surface from density functional theory calculations

Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Volumn 114, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 3981-3986

  Takeuchi, Noboru ^a   Kanai, Yosuke ^b   Selloni, Annabella ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b University of California   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC-SCALE MECHANISMS; CHAIN REACTION; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY CALCULATIONS; DESORPTION TEMPERATURES; HIGHER TEMPERATURES; META-STABLE STATE; PERIODIC DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY CALCULATIONS; RADICAL CHAIN; RADICAL CHAIN REACTIONS; REACTION PATHS; SI(0 0 1); SI(001) SURFACES; SI-DIMER;

ADSORPTION; DESORPTION; MOLECULES; SILICON; STYRENE; SURFACE REACTIONS;

DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY;

EID: 77949304899     PISSN: 19327447     EISSN: 19327455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp9097183     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Buriak, J. M. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1271-1308.
2. Bent, S. F. Surf. Sci. 2002, 500, 879-903.
3. Wolkow, R. A. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1999, 50, 413-441
4. Reboredo, F. A.; Schwegier, E.; Galli, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15243.
5. Silvestrelli, P. L.; Pulci, O.; Palummo, M.; Del Sole, R.; Ancilotto, F. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 68, 235306.
6. Calzolari, A.; Ruini, A.; Molinari, E.; Caldas, J. M. Phys. Rev. B, 2006, 73, 125420.
7. Lopinsky, G. P.; Wayner, D. D. M.; Wolkow, R. A. Nature 2000, 406, 48-51.
8. Takeuchi, N.; Kanai, Y.; Selloni, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15890-15896.
9. Cho, J. H.; Oh, D. H.; Kleinman, L. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 65, 081310 (R).
10. Tong, X.; DiLabio, G. A.; Wolkow, R. A. NanoLett 2004, 4, 979-983.
11. Takeuchi, N.; Selloni, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 11967-11972.
12. Hosssain, M. Z.; Kato, H. S.; Kawai, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15030-15031.
13. Hosssain, M. Z.; Kato, H. S.; Kawai, M. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005, 109, 23129-23133.
14. Martinez-Guerra, E.; Takeuchi, N. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75, 205338.
15. Hosssain, M. Z.; Kato, H. S.; Kawai, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3328-3332.
16. Piva, P. G.; Wolkow, R. A.; Kirczenow, G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 106801.
17. Car, R.; Parrinello, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985, 55, 2471-2474.
18. Laasonen, K.; Pasquarello, A.; Car, R.; Lee, C.; Vanderbilt, D. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 10142-10153.
19. Giannozzi P. http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.2569P.
20. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerholf, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865-3868.
21. Troullier, N.; Martins, J. L. Phys. Rev. B 1991, 43, 1993-2006.
22. Vanderbilt, D. Phys. Rev. B 1990, 41, 7892-7895.
23. Silvestrelli, P. L.; Toigo, F.; Ancilotto, F. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113 (39), 17124-17131.
24. Ren, E. W.; Vanden-Eijnden, W. E. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 66, 052301.
25. Kanai, Y.; Tilocca, A.; Selloni, A.; Car, R. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 3359-3367.
26. A similar difference was found for the energy barrier for hydrogen abstraction from a dimer in the neighboring row: 1.08 eV going directly from the bent to the vertical phenyl configuration, and 1.03 eV for the case phenyl group remains bent also in the final state. This inter-dimer abstraction of the H atom would result in the molecular line growth perpendicular to the Si dimer rows.