The supervision of professional doctorates: Experiences of the processes and ways forward

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 279-284

  Carr, Susan M ^a   Lhussier, Monique ^a   Chandler, Colin ^a  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Professional doctorate; Soft systems methodology; Supervision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MODEL; NURSING; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING STUDENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; FACULTY, NURSING; GREAT BRITAIN; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; MODELS, NURSING; NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING, SUPERVISORY; STUDENTS, NURSING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

EID: 77949270315     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: 15322793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Checkland P., and Poulter J. Learning For Action. A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and its Use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students (2006), John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, Chichester
2. Checkland P., and Scholes J. Soft Systems Methodology in Action (1990), Wiley and Sons
3. Clarke C., and Procter S. Practice development: ambiguity in research and practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing 30 4 (1999) 975-982
4. Cooksey, D., 2006. A review of UK health research funding. (accessed 28.05.03.).
5. Cowley S. Professional development and change in a learning organisation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 21 (1995) 965-974
6. Edwards S. A professional practice-based doctorate: developing advanced nursing practice. Nurse Education Today 29 (2009) 1-4
7. Ellis L.B. Professional Doctorates for nurses: mapping provision and perceptions. Journal of Advanced Nursing 50 4 (2005) 440-448
8. Evans B. Doctoral education in Australia. In: Powell S., and Green H. (Eds). The Doctorate Worldwide (2007), McGraw Hill International
9. Gatfield T. An investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 3 (2005) 311-325
10. Higher Education Funding Council for England. Improving Standards in Postgraduate Research Degree Programmes (2003), HEFCE, London
11. Holligan C. Fact and fiction: a case history of doctoral supervision. Educational Research 47 3 (2005) 267-278
12. Leitch, S., 2006. Leith review of skills. Prosperity for all in the global economy - world class skills.
13. McKenna, H., 1997. The Mission, Substance and Doctoral Education in Nursing. International Network of Doctoral Education Conference. Vision and Strategy for International Doctoral Education. Vancouver, Canada, June 1997. (accessed 19.01.07.).
14. Neuman R. Policy and practice in doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education 32 4 (2007) 459-473
15. Park C. New variant PhDL the changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 2 (2005) 189-207
16. Park C. Redefining the Doctorate (2007), The Higher Education Academy, York, UK
17. Petersen E.B. Negotiating academicity: postgraduate research supervision as category boundary work. Studies in Higher Education 32 4 (2007) 475-487
18. RCUK, 2008. RCUK Delivery Plan 2008/09 to 2010/11. (accessed 28.05.08.).
19. Reed J., and Procter S. Practitioner research in context. In: Reed J., and Procter S. (Eds). Practitioner Research in Health Care: The Insider Story (1995), Chapman and Hall 3-31
20. Roberts, G., 2002. SET for success. The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. The report of Sir Gareth Roberts' review.
21. Sainsbury, 2007. .
22. Thomson D., Kirkham S., Watson R., and Stewart S. Improving research supervision in nursing. Nurse Education Today 25 (2005) 283-290
23. Warry, P., 2006. Increasing the economic impact of Research Councils. (accessed 28.05.08.).
24. Winter R., Griffiths M., and Green K. The 'academic' qualities of practice. What are the criteria for a practice-based PhD?. Studies in Higher Education 25 1 (2000) 25-37