Pro-poor payments for environmental services: Challenges for the government and administrative agencies in Vietnam

Public Administration and Development

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 363-373

  Thuy, Pham Thu ^a   Ha, Hoang Minh ^b   Campbell, Bruce M ^c  

^a CHARLES DARWIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTRE ICRAF   (Kenya)

^c CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Administrative agencies; Government; Payments for environmental services; Pro poor; Vietnam

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK; CAPACITY BUILDING; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LAND TENURE; POLICY APPROACH; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; PRIVATE SECTOR;

ASIA; EURASIA; SOUTHEAST ASIA; VIET NAM;

EID: 58049111927     PISSN: 02712075     EISSN: 1099162X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pad.513     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Bracer C, Scherr S, Molnar A, Sekher M, Ochieng BO, Sriskanthan G. 2007. Organisation and governance for fostering pro-poor compensation for environmental services: CES Scoping Study Issue Paper No. 4. ICRAF Working Paper No. 39, World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi.
2. Bui DT, Dang TH, Nguyen QC. 2004. Rewarding Upland Farmers for Environmental Services: Experience, Constraints and Potential in Vietnam. World Agroforestry Center: Bogor.
3. Campbell BM, Shackleton S. 2001. The organisational structures for community-based natural resource management in Southern Africa. African Studies Quarterly 5(3): URL: http://web.africa.ufl.edu/asq/v5/v5i3a6.htm
4. Dao MC. 1997. Administrative reform in Vietnam: need and strategy. Asian Journal of Public Administration 19(2): 303-320.
5. Denzin NK. 1978. Sociological Methods. McGraw-Hill: New York.
6. Dudley N, Mansourian S, Stolton S, Suksuwan S. 2007. Natural Security - Protected Areas and Poverty Reduction - A Research Report by WWF and Equilibrium. World Wide Fund for Nature.
7. Fritzen AS. 2006. Probing system limits: decentralisation and local political accountability in Vietnam. The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 28(1): 1-23.
8. Hoang MH, Noordwijk VM, Pham TT (eds). 2008. Payment for Environmental Services in Vietnam - Lessons and Experiences in Vietnam. World Agroforestry Center in Vietnam: Hanoi.
9. Huang M, Upadhyaya S. 2007. Watershed-based payment for environmental services in Asia. Working Paper No. 06-07, August 2007, Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management Collaborative Research Support Program (SANREM CRSP). Office of International Research, Education and Development (OIRED), Virginia Tech.
10. Institute for Economic Research - Ho Chi Minh City. 2008. Legal Framework for State Management for in Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh City People's Committee: HCMC.
11. Jutting J, Corsi E, Kauffmann C, Mcdonnell I, Osterrieder H, Pinaud N, Wegner L. 2005. What makes decentralization in developing countries pro-poor? The European Journal of Development Research 17(4): 626-648.
12. Lee E, Mahanty S. 2007. Payments for Environmental Services and Poverty Reduction: Risks and Opportunities. Regional Community Forestry Training Center for Asia and the Pacific: Bangkok.
13. Leimona B, Lee E. 2008. Pro-Poor Payment for Environmental Services Some Considerations. RUPES - ICRAF SEA: Bogor.
14. Leisinger MK. 1998. Sustainable development at the turn of the century: perceptions and outlook. International Journal of Sustainable Development 1(1): 73-98.
15. Mahmood IAS. 2005. Separation of power in Bangladesh: the role of public administration. Public Administration and Management 10(4): 325-348.
16. McCarty A. 2001. Governance institutions and incentive structures in Vietnam. Public Sector Challenges and Government Reforms in South East Asia Conference Proceedings, Research Institute for Asia and the Pacific, Sydney, pp. 26-62.
17. North D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
18. O'Callaghan B. 2008. Local revenue sharing: Nha Trang bay marine protected area, Vietnam. In Payment for Environmental Services: Experiences and Lessons in Vietnam, Hoang MH, Noordwijk VM, Pham TT (eds). World Agroforestry Center: Bogor; 30-31.
19. Pagiola S, Arcenas A, Platais G. 2005. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development 33(2): 237-253.
20. Patton MQ. 1999. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. HSR: Health Services Research 34(5): 1189-1208.
21. Perdant S. 2004. Introduction to sustainable development. In Sustainable Development in Practice: Case Studies for Engineers and Scientists, Azapagic A, Perdant S, Clift R (eds). Wiley: London; 3-28.
22. Ravnborg MH, Damsgaard GM, Raben K. 2007. Payments for Ecosystem Services: Issues and Pro-Poor Opportunities for Development Assistance. Danish Institute for International Studies: Copenhagen.
23. Schiavo-Campo S, Sundaram P. 2000. To Serve and To Preserve: Improving Public Administration in a Competitive World. Asian Development Bank: Manila.
24. Swallow B, Dick MR, Noordwijk VM. 2005. CAPRi Working Paper # 42, Localizing demand and supply of environmental services: interactions with property rights, collective action and the welfare of the poor, International Food Policy Research Institute.
25. Swallow B, Leimona B, Yatich T, Velarde SJ, Puttaswamaiah S. 2007. The conditions for effective mechanisms of compensation and rewards for environmental services: CES Scoping Study, Issue Paper No. 3. ICRAF Working Paper No. 38, World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi.
26. The Governmental Office Vietnam. 2005. Vietnam Civil Code. The Governmental Office of Vietnam: Hanoi.
27. UNDP. 2008. Public Administration Reform. UNDP Vietnam, Hanoi.
28. Vu TP. 2008. Building payment mechanisms for carbon sequestration in forestry: a pilot project in Cao Phong district of Hoa Binh province, Vietnam. In Payment for Environmental Services: Experiences and Lessons in Vietnam. Hoang MH, Noordwijk VM, Pham TT (eds). World Agroforestry Center in Vietnam: Hanoi; 28-29.
29. Warner K. 2008. Integrating payments for ecosystem services into Vietnam's policies and programmes. In Payment for Environmental Services: Experiences and Lessons in Vietnam. Hoang MH, Noordwijk VM, Pham TT (eds). World Agroforestry Center in Vietnam: Hanoi; 19-21.
30. Wertz-Kanounnikoff S, Rankine H. 2008. How Can Governments Promote Strategic Approaches to Payments for Environmental Services (PES)? An Exploratory Analysis for the Case of Vietnam. IDDRI: France.
31. Wunder S. 2005. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42, Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta.
32. Wunder S. 2006. Are direct payments for environmental services spelling doom for sustainable forest management in the tropics? Ecology and Society 11(2): 23.
33. Wunder S. 2007. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology 21(1): 48-58.
34. Wunder S. 2008. Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence. Environment and Development Economics 13: 279-297.
35. Wunder S, Ibarra E, Bui DT. 2005. Payment is Good But Control is Better: Why Payments for Forest-Environmental Services in Vietnam Have So Far Remained Incipient. CIFOR: Bogor.