Compensation and rewards for environmental services in the developing world: Framing pan-tropical analysis and comparison

Ecology and Society

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Swallow, Brent M ^a   Kallesoe, Mikkel F ^b   Iftikhar, Usman A ^b   van Noordwijk, Meine ^a   Bracer, Carina ^b   Scherr, Sara J ^c   Raju, K V ^d   Poats, Susan V ^e   Duraiappah, Anantha Kumar ^f   Ochieng, Benson O ^g   Mallee, Hein ^h   Rumley, Rachael ^a  

^a WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTRE ICRAF   (Kenya)

^b World Conservation Union ^*

^c Ecoagriculture Partners   (United States)

^d INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHANGE   (India)

^e Grupo Randi Randi   (Ecuador)

^f United Nations Environment Programme   (Kenya)

^g African Technology Policy Studies Network   (Kenya)

^h International Development Research Centre   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Africa; Asia; Compensation; Ecosystems service; Latin america; Payment for environmental service; Rewards

Indexed keywords

COMPENSATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DEVELOPING WORLD; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; NATURE CONSERVATION; STAKEHOLDER;

AFRICA; ASIA; LATIN AMERICA;

EID: 73849133874     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-02499-140226     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arifin, B., B. Swallow, Suyanto, and R. Coe. 2008. A conjoint analysis of farmer preferences for social forestry contracts in the Sumber Jaya watershed, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre Working Paper. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.
2. Callicott, J. B. 1991. The wilderness idea revisited: the sustainable development alternative. The Environmental Professional 13:235-247.
3. Chape, S., L. Fish, P. Fox, and M. Spalding. 2003. United Nations list of protected areas. IUCN and UNEP, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
4. Crocker, T. D. 1966. The structuring of atmospheric pollution control systems. Pages 61-68 in H. Wolozin, editor. The economics of air pollution. W. W. Norton & Co., New York, New York, USA.
5. Di Leva, C. 2002. The conservation of nature and natural resources through legal and market-based instruments. Reciel 11(1):84-95.
6. Earthwatch Institute, IUCN, WBCSD, and WRI. 2006. Ecosystem challenges and business implications. Earthwatch Institute, World Resources Institute, WBCSD and World Conservation Union, London, UK and Gland, Switzerland.
7. Ferraro, P., and A. Kiss. 2002. Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 298:1718-1719.
8. Fay, C., and G. Michon. 2005. Readressing forestry hegemony when a forestry regulatory framework is best replaced by an agrarian one. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 15(2):193-209.
9. Hamilton, K., R. Bayon, G. Turner, and D. Higgins. 2007. State of the voluntary carbon markets 2007: picking up steam. The Ecosystem Marketplace and New Carbon Finance, Washington, D.C., USA and London, UK.
10. Jordan, A., R. K. W. Wurzel, and A. Zito. 2005. The rise of "new" policy instruments in comparative perspective: has governance eclipsed government? Political Studies 53(3):477-496.
11. Knight, R. L. 1996. Aldo Leopold, the land ethic, and ecosystem management. The Journal of Wildlife Management 60(3):471-474.
12. McKay, J., and H. Bjornlund. 2001. Recent Australian market mechanisms as a component of an environmental policy that can make choices between sustainability and social justice. Social Justice Research 14(4):387-403.
13. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis report. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
14. Oates, J. F. 1999. Myth and reality in the rain forest: how conservation strategies are failing in West Africa. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
15. Ochieng, B., B. Otiende, and R. Rumley. 2007. African regional workshop on compensation for ecosystem services (CES). 22-24 May 2006, Nairobi, Kenya. ICRAF Working Paper No. 35. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.
16. Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
17. Pagiola, S., J. Bishop, and N. Landell-Mills. 2002. Selling forest environmental services, market-based mechanisms for conservation and development. Earthscan, London, UK.
18. Pagiola, S., A. Arcenas, and G. Platais. 2004. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development 33(2):237-253.
19. Poats, S. V. 2007. Report on the Latin American regional workshop on compensation for environmental services and poverty alleviation in Latin America. 26-28 April 2006, Quito, Ecuador. ICRAF Working Paper No. 33. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.
20. Robertson, N., and S. Wunder. 2005. Fresh tracks in the forest: assessing incipient payments for environmental services initiatives in Bolivia. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
21. Rosa, H., S. Kandel, and L. Dimas. 2004. Compensation for environmental services and rural communities: lessons from the Americas. International Forestry Review 6(2):187-194.
22. Stavins, R. N., 2002. Lessons from the American experiment with market-based environmental policies. Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP01-032. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
23. Tomich, T. P., D. E. Thomas, and M. van Noorwijk, editors. 2004. Environmental services and land use change: bridging the gap between policy and research in Southeast Asia. Elsevier Science. Also published as a special issue of Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 104 (1):1-244.
24. Wells, M., S. Guggenheim, A. Khan, W. Wardojo, and P. Jepson. 1999. Investing in biodiversity: a review of Indonesia's integrated conservation and development projects. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.
25. Wikimedia Foundation. 2009. Wikipedia, the free encylopedia. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco, California, USA. [online] URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compensation.
26. Woodward, R. 2005. Markets for the environment. Choices: the Magazine of Food, Farm and Resource Issues 20(1):49?51.
27. Wunder, S. 2005. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.