Hit the ground running: Ten ideas for preparing and supporting urban literacy coaches

Reading Teacher

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 348-359

  Blachowicz, Camille L Z ^a   Buhle, Roberta ^a   Ogle, Donna ^a   Frost, Sharon ^a   Correa, Amy ^a   Kinner, Jodi Dodds ^a  

^a NATIONAL LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77749320878     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RT.63.5.1     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Advanced Reading Development Demonstration Project. (2008). Partnerships for improving literacy in urban schools. The Reading Teacher, 61(8), 674-680. doi: 10.1598/RT.61.8.11
2. Bean, R.M. (2004). The reading specialist: Leadership for the classroom, school, and community. New York: Guilford.
3. Bean, R., Cassidy, J., Grumet, J., Shelton, D., & Wallis, S. (2002). What do reading specialists do? Results from a national survey. The Reading Teacher, 55(8), 736-744.
4. Blachowicz, C.L.Z., Fisher, P., Ivy, C., McAvoy, E., Owens, E., Anderson, S., et al. (1999). Reading specialists reflect: The value of one-to-one experiences in clinical training. In D.H. Evensen & RB. Mosenthal (Vol. Eds.), Reconsidering the role of the reading clinic in a new age of literacy: Vol.6. Advances in Reading/Language Research. Greenwich (pp. 101-131). CT: JAI Press.
5. Blachowicz, C.L.Z., Obrochta, C., & Fogelberg, E. (2005). Literacy coaching for change. Educational Leadership, 62(6), 55-58.
6. Brozo, W.G., & Hargis, C.H. (2003). Taking seriously the idea of reform: One high school's efforts to make reading more responsive to all students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(1), 14-23.
7. Cassidy, J., & Cassidy, D. (2005/2006, December/January). What's hot, what's not for 2006. Reading Today, 23(3), 1,8-9.
8. Chicago Public Schools, (n.d.). Chicago Reading Initiative. Retrieved February 9,2009, from cri.cps.k12.il.us
9. DeStefano, L., Hanson, M., & Kallemeyn, L. (2005, August). External evaluation of the Advanced Reading Development Demonstration Project (ARDDP): Year three report to The Chicago Community Trust. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
10. Duke, N.K., & Pearson, P.D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
11. Frost, S., Buhle, R., & Blachowicz, C.L.Z. (2009). Effective literacy coaching: Building expertise and a culture of literacy. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
12. International Reading Association, Professional Standards and Ethics Committee. (2003). Standards for reading professionals. Newark, DE: Author.
13. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIHPublication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
14. Ogle, D. (in press). Partnering for content literacy: PRC2 in action. Developing academic language for all learners. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15. Paratore, J.R., & McCormack, R.L. (Eds.). (2007). Classroom literacy assessment: Making sense of what students know and do. New York: Guilford.
16. Quatroche, D.J., Bean, R.M., & Hamilton, R.L. (2001). The role of the reading specialist: A review of research. The Reading Teacher, 55(3), 282-294.
17. Reigeluth, C.M., & Frick, T.W. (1999). Formative research: A methodology for creating and improving design theories. In Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 633651). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Reinking, D., & Watkins, J. (2000). A formative experiment investigating the use of multimedia book reviews to increase elementary students' independent reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(3), 384-419. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.35.3.4
19. Tatum, A.W. (2004). A road map for reading specialists entering schools without exemplary reading programs: Seven quick lessons. The Reading Teacher, 55(1), 28-39. doi: 10.1598/ RT.58.1.3
20. U.S. Department of Education, (n.d.). No Child Left Behind. Retrieved February 22, 2003, from www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml?src=pb
21. Vogt, M., & Shearer, B.A. (2007). Reading specialists and literacy coaches in the real world (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.