North American study on essential derivation in maize: II. Selection and evaluation of a panel of simple sequence repeat loci

Crop Science

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 486-503

  Kahler, Alex L ^a   Kahler, Jonathan L ^a   Thompson, Steven A ^b   Ferriss, Ronald S ^c   Jones, Elizabeth S ^d   Nelson, Barry K ^d   Mikel, Mark A ^e   Smith, Stephen ^d  

^a Biogenetic Services Inc   (United States)

^b DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC   (United States)

^c Pioneer Hi Bred ^*  (United States)

^d PIONEER HI BRED INTERNATIONAL INC   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77749283715     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2009.03.0121     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andreau, B., P. Dubreuil, D. Perret, F. Ananza, and A. Charcosset. 2003. Synthesis of studies conducted by SEPROMA on the estimate of genetic distance between maize inbred lines. INRA, Gif/Yvette, France, and SEPROMA, Paris, France.
2. ASSINSEL. 1999. Essential derivation and dependence: Practical information. Int. Seef Federation, Nyon, Switzerland.
3. Bernardo, R., and A.L. Kahler. 2001. North American study on essential derivation in maize: Inbreds developed without and with selection from F2 populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102:986-992.
4. Clark A., M.J. Hubisz, C.D. Bustamante, S.H. Williamson, and R. Nielsen. 2005. Ascertainment bias in studies of the human genome-wide polymorphism. Genome Res. 15:1496-1502.
5. Delannay, X., D.M. Rodgers, and R.G. Palmer. 1983. Relative contributions among ancestral lines of North American soybean cultivars. Crop Sci. 23:944-949.
6. Dillmann, C., A. Bar-Hen, D. Guerin, A. Charcosset, and A. Murigneux. 1997. Comparison of RFLP and morphological distances between maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines: Consequences for germplasm protection purposes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:92-102.
7. Falconer, D.S. 1960. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London.
8. Heckenberger, M., J. Rouppe van der Voort, A.E. Melchinger, J. Peleman, and M. Bohn. 2003. Variation of DNA fingerprints among accessions within maize inbred lines and implications for identification of essentially derived varieties: II. Genetic and technical sources of variation in AFLP data and comparison with SSR data. Mol. Breed. 12:97-106.
9. Heckenberger, M., M. Bohn, D. Klein, and A.E. Melchinger. 2005a. Identification of essentially derived varieties obtained from biparental crosses of homozygous lines: II. Morphological distances and heterosis in comparison with simple sequence repeat and amplified fragment length polymorphism data in maize. Crop Sci. 45:1132-1140.
10. Heckenberger, M., M. Bohn, and A.E. Melchinger. 2005b. Identification of essentially derived varieties obtained from bipa rental crosses of homozygous lines: I. Simple sequence repeat data from maize inbreds. Crop Sci. 45:1120-1131.
11. Heckenberger, M., J. Muminovic, J. Rouppe van der Voort, J. Peleman, M. Bohn, and A.E. Melchinger. 2006. Identification of essentially derived varieties obtained from biparental crosses of homozygous lines: III. AFLP data from maize inbreds and comparison with SSR data. Mol. Breed. 17:111-125.
12. ISF. 2003. ISF view on intellectual property. International Seed Federation, Nyon, Switzerland.
13. ISF. 2005. Essential derivation information and guidance to breeders. International Seed Federation, Nyon, Switzerland.
14. ISF. 2006. Use of DNA markers for DUS testing, essential derivation and identification. International Seed Federation, Nyon, Switzerland.
15. ISF. 2008. Guidelines for the handling of a dispute on essential derivation of maize lines. May 2008. International Seed Federation, Nyon, Switzerland.
16. Jones, E.S., W.-C. Chu, M. Ayele, J. Ho, E. Bruddeman, K. Yourstone, A. Rafalski, O.S. Smith, M.D. McMullen, C. Bezawada, J. Warren, J. Babayev, S. Basu, and S. Smith. 2009. Development of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for use in commercial maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm. Mol. Breed. 24:165-176.
17. Jones, E.S., H. Sullivan, D. Bhattramakki, and J.S.C. Smith. 2007. A comparison of simple sequence repeat and single nucleotide polymorphism marker technologies for the genotypic analysis of maize (Zea mays L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 115:361-371.
18. Malecot, G. 1948. Les mathématiques de l'hérédité. Masson and Cie, Paris. English translation. The mathematics of heredity. 1969. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA.
19. Rafalski A. and S. Tingey. 2008. SNPs and their use in maize. p. 30-43. In R.J. Henry (ed.) Plant genotyping II: SNP technology. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
20. Rohlf, F. J. 2005. NTSYS-pc, numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.2 Exeter software, Setauket, NY.
21. Saghai-Maroof, M.A., K. M. Soliman, R. Jorgensen, and R.W. Allard. 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:8014-8018.
22. Smith, J.S.C., O.S. Smith, S.L. Bowen, R.A. Tenborg, and S.J. Wall. 1991. The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize: III. A revised scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines utilizing DNA RFLPs. Maydica 36:213-226.
23. Stuber, C.W., J.F. Wendel, M.M. Goodman, and J.S.C. Smith. 1988. Techniques and scoring procedures for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from maize (Zea mays L.). Univ. of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC.
24. UPOV. 1991. Act of 1991 International convention for the pro tection of new varieties of plants. Union Internationale pour la Protection des Obtentions Vegetales, Geneva, Switzerland.
25. Wang, J., and R. Bernardo. 2000. Variance of marker estimates of parental contribution to F2 and BC1-derived inbreds. Crop Sci. 40:659-665.
26. Wright, S. 1978. Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol. 4. Variability within and among natural populations. Univ. of Chicago Press. Chicago.