Identification of essentially derived varieties obtained from biparental crosses of homozygous lines. III. AFLP data from maize inbreds and comparison with SSR data

Molecular Breeding

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 111-125

  Heckenberger, M ^a   Muminovic J ^a   Van Der Voort, J Rouppe ^b   Peleman, J ^b   Bohn, M ^c   Melchinger, A E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b KEYGENE N V   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Amplified fragment length polymorphism; Essentially derived varieties; Genetic distance; Intellectual property; Maize; Molecular markers; Parental contribution; Simple sequence repeat

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKERS; PLANTS (BOTANY);

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISMS; ESSENTIALLY DERIVED VARIETIES; GENETIC DISTANCES; INBRED LINE; MAIZE; MAIZE INBREDS; MOLECULAR MARKER; PARENTAL CONTRIBUTION; POWER; SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEATS;

DNA SEQUENCES;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 33644779037     PISSN: 13803743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-005-3851-5     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. J.A. Anderson G.A. Churchill J.E. Autrique S.D. Tanksley M.E. Sorrells 1993 Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps Genome 36 181 186
2. ASSINSEL. 1999. Essential Derivation and Dependence. Practical Information. http://www.worldseed.org/Position_papers/derive.htm.
3. C. Dillmann A. Charcosset B. Goffinet J.S.C. Smith Y. Dattée 1997 Best linear unbiased estimator of the molecular genetic distance between inbred lines. Advances in biometrical genetics P. Krajewski Z. Kaczmarek Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the EUCARPIA Section Biometrics in Plant Breeding Poznan Poland 105110 14-16 May 1997.
4. J.L. Foulley W.G. Hill 1999 On the precision of estimation of genetic distance Gen. Sel. Evol. 31 457 464
5. M. Frisch M. Bohn A.E. Melchinger 2000 Plabsim: software for simulation of marker-assisted backcrossing J. Hered. 91 86 87
6. L. Goodman 1960 On the exact variance of products J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 55 708 713
7. S. Grandillo H.M. Ku S.D. Tanksley 1999 Identifying the loci responsible for natural variation in fruit size and shape in tomato Theor. Appl. Genet. 99 978 987
8. M. Heckenberger M. Bohn J.S. Ziegle L.K. Joe J.D. Hauser M. Hutton A.E. Melchinger 2002 Variation of DNA fingerprints among accessions within maize inbred lines and implications for identification of essentially derived varieties. I. Genetic and technical sources of variation in SSR data Mol. Breed. 10 181 191
9. M. Heckenberger J. van der Voort A.E. Melchinger J. Peleman M. Bohn 2003 Variation of DNA fingerprints among accessions within maize inbred lines and implications for identification of essentially derived varieties. II. Genetic and technical sources of variation in AFLP data and comparison to SSR data Mol. Breed. 12 97 106
10. M. Heckenberger M. Bohn D. Klein A.E. Melchinger 2005a Identification of essentially derived varieties obtained from biparental crosses of homozygous lines. II. Morphological distances and heterosis in comparison with SSR and AFLP data in maize Crop Sci. 45 1132 1140
11. Heckenberger M., Bohn M., Maurer H.P., Frisch M. and Melchinger A.E. 2005b. Identification of essentially derived varieties with molecular markers: an approach based on statistical test theory and computer simulations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111: 598-608.
12. M. Heckenberger M. Bohn A.E. Melchinger 2005c Identification of essentially derived varieties obtained from biparental crosses of homozygous lines. I. SSR data from maize inbreds Crop Sci. 45 1120 1131
13. R. Ihaka R. Gentleman 1996 R: A language for data analysis and graphics J. Comp. Graph. Stat. 5 299 314
14. International Seed Federation 2002 Principles of a Code of Conduct in Essentially Derived Varieties of Perennial Ryegrass International Seed Federation Chicago
15. N.L. Johnson S. Kotz N. Balakrishnan 1995 Continuous Univariate Distributions Vol. 2 J. Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York
16. C.J. Jones K.J. Edwards S. Castaglione M.O. Winfield F. Sala C. de Wiel G. Bredemeijer B. Vosman M. Matthes A. Daly R. Brettschneider P. Bettini M. Buiatti E. Maestri A. Malcevschi N. Marmiroli R. Aert G. Volckaert J. Rueda R. Linacero A. Vazquez A. Karp 1997 Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories Mol. Breed. 3 381 390
17. V. Lefebvre B. Goffinet J.C. Chauvet B. Caromel P. Signoret R. Brand R. Palloix 2001 Evaluation of genetic distances between pepper inbred lines for cultivar protection purposes: comparisons of AFLP, RAPD and phenotypic data Theor. Appl. Genet. 102 741 750
18. V. Lombard C. Baril P. Dubreuil F. Blouet D. Zhang 2000 Genetic relationships and fingerprinting of rapeseed cultivars by AFLP: consequences for varietal registration Crop Sci. 40 1417 1425
19. Lübberstedt T., Vuylsteke M., Dussle C., Kuiper M. and Melchinger A.E. 1999. Studies on genetic diversity of European maize inbred lines using AFLPs, RFLPs, RAPDs and SSRs - a comparison of different marker systems. Report of the 1998 Conference of the Association of Austrian Plant Breeders, Austria24-26 November 1998, Vol. 94, pp. 45-49.
20. T. Lübberstedt A.E. Melchinger C. Dussle M. Vuylsteke M. Kuiper 2000 Relationships Among Early European Maize Inbreds: IV. Genetic diversity revealed with AFLP markers and comparison with RFLP, RAPD, and Pedigree data Crop Sci. 40 783 791
21. G. Malecot 1948 Les mathématiques de l' hérédite Masson et Cie Paris
22. Y. Matsuoka S.E. Mitchell S. Kresovich M. Goodman J. Doebley 2002 Microsatellites in Zea - variability, patterns of mutations, and use for evolutionary studies Theor. Appl. Genet. 104 436 450
23. H.P. Maurer A.E. Melchinger M. Frisch 2004 Plabsoft: Software for simulation and data analysis in plant breeding Tulln Austria Poster presented at the 17th EUCARPIA congress, 8-11 Sept 2004.
24. A.E. Melchinger A. Graner M. Singh M.M. Messmer 1994 Relationships among European barley germplasm. 1. Genetic diversity among winter and spring cultivars revealed by RFLPs Crop Sci. 34 1191 1199
25. A.E. Melchinger M.M. Messmer M. Lee W.L. Woodman K.R. Lamkey 1991 Diversity and relationships among U.S. maize inbreds revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphism Crop Sci. 31 669 678
26. M. Morgante A. Rafalski P. Biddle S. Tingey A.M. Olivieri 1994 Genetic mapping and variability of seven soybean simple sequence repeat loci Genome 37 763 769
27. I. Pejic P. Ajmone-Marsan M. Morgante V. Kozumplick P. Castiglioni G. Taramino M. Motto 1998 Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs, and AFLPs Theor. Appl. Genet. 97 1248 1255
28. Peleman J., van Wijk R., van Oeveren J. and van Schaik R. 2000. Linkage map integration: an integrated genetic map of Zea mays L. Poster P472. Plant & Animal Genome Conference VIII.
29. W. Powell M. Morgante C. Andre M. Hanafey J. Vogel S. Tingey A. Rafalski 1996 The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis Mol. Breed. 2 225 238
30. Rogers J.S. 1972. Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance. In: Studies in Genet. VII Univ., Texas Publ. 7213, pp. 145-153.
31. J.S.C. Smith E.C.L. Chin H. Shu O.S. Smith S.J. Wall M.L. Senior S.E. Mitchell S. Kresovich J. Ziegle 1997 An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.) - comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree Theor. Appl. Genet. 95 163 173
32. J.S.C. Smith M.L. Senior 2000 The utility of simple sequence repeat (SSR) data to preferentially identify progeny lines of maize (Zea mays L.) that are bred from known inbred parents Maydica 45 205 213
33. B. Stich A.E. Melchinger M. Frisch H.P. Maurer M. Heckenberger J.C. Reif 2005 Linkage disequilibrium in European elite maize germplasm investigated with SSRs Theor. Appl. Genet. 111 723 730
34. G.W. Snedecor W.G. Cochran 1980 Statistical Methods Iowa State University Press Ames
35. S.D. Tanksley M.W. Ganal J.P. Prince M.C. de-Vicente M.W. Bonierbale P. Broun T.M. Fulton J.J. Giovannoni S. Grandillo G.B. Martin R. Messeguer J.C. Miller L. Miller A.H. Paterson O. Pineda M.S. Roder R.A. Wing W. Wu N.D. Young 1992 High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes Genetics 132 1141 1160
36. J.G. Tivang J. Nienhuis O.S. Smith 1994 Estimation of sampling variance of molecular marker data using the bootstrap procedure Theor. Appl. Genet. 89 259 264
37. A.F. Troyer T.R. Rocheford 2002 Germplasm Ownership: Related Corn Inbreds Crop Sci. 42 3 11
38. UPOV 1978. International convention for the protection of new varieties of plants.
39. UPOV 1991. International convention for the protection of new varieties of plants. http://www.upov.int/en/publications/conventions/1991/content.htm.
40. F.A. van Eeuwijk C.P. Baril 2001 Conceptual and statistical issues related to the use of molecular markers for distinctness and essential derivation Acta Hort. 546 35 53
41. X. Vekemans T. Beauwens M. Lemaire I. Roldan-Ruiz 2002 Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size Mol. Ecol. 11 139 151
42. P. Vos R. Hogers M. Bleeker M. Reijans T.V.D. Lee M. Hornes A. Frijters J. Pot J. Peleman M. Kuiper M. Zabeau 1995 AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting Nucleic Acid Res. 23 4407 4414
43. B. Vosman D. Visser J.R. Van Der Voort M.J.M. Smulders F. Van Eeuwijk 2004 The establishment of 8essential derivation9 among rose varieties, using AFLP Theor. Appl. Genet. 109 1718 1725
44. ® linkage maps of Zea mays L.: analysis of the distribution of AFLP markers Theor. Appl. Genet. 99 921 935
45. ® data as a tool in genetic diversity assessments among maize (Zea mays L.) Inbred lines Mol. Breed. 6 265 276
46. 1-derived inbreds Crop Sci. 40 659 665
47. S. Wang Z.M. Bao B. Pan L.L. Zhang B. Yao A.B. Zhan K. Bi Q.Q. Zhang 2004 AFLP linkage map of an intraspecific cross in Chlamys farreri J. Shellf. Res. 23 491 499
48. K.-S. Wu S.D. Tanksley 1993 Abundancepolymorphism and genetic mapping of microsatellites in rice Mol. Gen. Genet. 241 225 235