Scientific and commercial incentives in R&D: Research versus development?

Journal of Economics and Management Strategy

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 185-221

  Banal Estañol, Albert ^a   Macho Stadler, Inés ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77749254667     PISSN: 10586407     EISSN: 15309134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00250.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Stein J. Academia, the Private Sector, and the Process of Innovation. RAND Journal of Economics 2008, 39(3):617-635.
2. Banal-Estañol A, Jofre-Bonet M, Meissner C. The Impact of Industry Collaboration on Academic Research Output: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis. 2008, City University, Working Paper
3. Banal-Estañol A, Macho-Stadler I. Commercial Incentives in Academia. 2007, UAB Working Paper
4. Bar T. Defensive Publications in a R&D Race. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 2006, 15(1):229-254.
5. Beggs A. The Licensing of Patents under Asymmetric Information. International Journal of Industrial Organisation 1992, 10:171-191.
6. Cabral L. R&D Competition when Firms Choose Variance. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 2003, 12(1):139-150.
7. Cockburn I, Henderson R, Stern S. Balancing Incentives: The Tension between Basic and Applied Research. 1999a, NBER Working Paper
8. Cockburn I, Henderson R, Stern S. The Diffusion of Science-Driven Drug Discovery: Organizational Change in Pharmaceutical Research. 1999b, NBER Working Paper 7359
9. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 1989, 99(397):569-596.
10. Etzkowitz H. Research Groups As 'Quasi-Firms': The Invention of the Entrepreneurial University. Research Policy 2003, 32:109-121.
11. Florida R, Cohen WM. Engine or Infrastructure? The University Role in Economic Development. Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States 1999, 589-610. Branscomb LM, Kodama FFlorida R. in, eds., London, The MIT Press
12. Gallini NT, Wright BD. Technology Transfer under Asymmetric Information. Rand Journal of Economics 1990, 21:147-160.
13. Gambardella A. Competitive Advantage Form In-house Scientific Research: The US Pharmaceutical Industry in the 1980's. Research Policy 1992, 21:1-17.
14. Geuna A, Nesta L. University Patenting and its Effect on Academic Research: The Emerging European Evidence. Research Policy 2006, 35:790-807.
15. Hauser JR, Zettelmeyer F. Metrics to Evaluate R&D Groups. Phase I: Qualitative Interviews. Research Technology Management 1997, 40(4):32-38.
16. Henderson R, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M. Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988. Review of Economics and Statistics 1998, 80:119-127.
17. Hicks D, Hamilton K. Does University-Industry Collaboration Adversely Affect University Research. Issues in Science and Technology 1999, 74-75.
18. Holmstrom B, Milgrom P. Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design. Journal of Law Economics & Organization 1991, 7:24-52.
19. Jensen RA, Thursby MC. Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions. American Economic Review 2001, 91:240-259.
20. Jensen RA, Thursby JG, Thursby MC. The Disclosure Licensing of University Innovations: The Best We Can Do With the S**t We get to Work With. International Journal of Industrial Organisation 2003, 21:1271-1300.
21. Lacetera N. Academic Entrepreneurship. Managerial and Decision Economics 2009, 30(7):443-464.
22. Lacetera N. Different Missions and Commitment Power: An Institutional View of Industry-University Relations. Organisation Science forthcoming
23. Lacetera N, Zirulia L. Knowledge Spillovers, Competition, and Taste for Science in a Model of R&D Incentive Provision. 2008, Working Paper
24. Macho-Stadler I, Martínez-Giralt X, Pérez-Castrillo D. The Role of Information in Licensing Contract Design. Research Policy 1996, 25:25-41.
25. Macho-Stadler I, Pérez-Castrillo D. Contracts de Licence et Asymétrie d'Information. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 1991, 24:189-208.
26. Macho-Stadler I, Veugelers R. Designing Contracts for University Spin-offs. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 2008, 17:185-218.
27. Mansfield E. Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations: Sources, Characteristics, and Financing. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1995, 77:55-65.
28. Mowery D, Nelson R, Sampat B, Ziedonis A. The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by U.S. Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy 2001, 30:99-119.
29. Mowery D, Sampat B, Ziedonis A. Learning to Patent? Institutional Experience and the Quality of University Patents. Management Science 2002, 48:73-89.
30. Mowery DC, Ziedonis A. Academic Patent Quality and Quantity Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States. Research Policy 2002, 31:399-418.
31. Murray F. Innovation as Overlapping Scientific and Technological Trajectories: Exploring Tissue Engineering. Research Policy 2002, 31(8-9):1389-1403.
32. Murray F, Stern S. Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the Anti-commons Hypothesis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 2007, 63:648-687.
33. Nelson R. The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research. Journal of Political Economy 1959, 67(3):297-306.
34. O'Donoghue T, Scotchmer S, Thisse J-F. Patent Breadth, Patent Life, and the Pace of Technological Progress. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 1998, 7(1):1-32.
35. Stephan PE, Levin SG. Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time 1992, New York, Oxford University Press
36. Stern S. Incentives and Focus in University and Industrial Research: The Case of Synthetic Insulin. Sources of Medical Technology: University and Industry 1995, 157-187. Rosenberg NGeligns ADawkins H. in, eds., Washington, DC, National Academic Press
37. Stern S. Do Scientist Pay to be Scientist. Management Science 2004, 50:835-853.
38. Stokes D. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. 1997, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution
39. Thursby JG, Thursby MC. Who is Selling the Ivory Tower: The Sources of Growth in University Licensing. Management Science 2002, 48:90-104.
40. Thursby JG, Thursby MC. Patterns of Research and Licensing Activity of Science and Engineering Faculty. Science and the University 2007, Ehrenberg R, Stephan P. in, eds., Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Press
41. Thursby MC, Thursby JG, Mukherjee S. Are there Real Effects of Licensing on Academic Research? A Life Cycle View. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2007, 63(4):577-598.