Supervised ranking for pronoun resolution: Some recent improvements

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 3, Issue , 2005, Pages 1081-1086

  Ng, Vincent ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Dallas   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTIC KNOWLEDGE; PRONOUN RESOLUTION; SUPERVISED RANKING;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; LINGUISTICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

SUPERVISORY AND EXECUTIVE PROGRAMS;

EID: 29344475280     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Aone, C., and Bennett, S. W. 1995. Evaluating automated and manual acquisition of anaphora resolution strategies. In Proc. of the ACL, 122-129.
2. Bean, D., and Riloff, E. 1999. Corpus-based identification of non-anaphoric noun phrases. In Proc. of the ACL, 373-380.
3. Bean, D., and Riloff, E. 2004. Unsupervised learning of contextual role knowledge for coreference resolution. In Proc. of HLT/NAACL, 297-304.
4. Brennan, S. E.; Friedman, M. W.; and Pollard, C. J. 1987. A centering approach to pronouns. In Proc. of the ACL, 155-162.
5. Byron, D., and Gegg-Harrison, W. 2004. Eliminating non-referring noun phrases from coreference resolution. In Proc. of DAARC, 21-26.
6. Dagan, I., and Itai, A. 1990. Automatic processing of large corpora for the resolution of anaphora references. In Proc. of COLING, 330-332.
7. Ge, N.; Hale, J.; and Charniak, E. 1998. A statistical approach to anaphora resolution. In Proc. of WVLC, 161-170.
8. Hobbs, J. 1978. Resolving pronoun references. Lingua 44:311-338.
9. Iida, R.; Inui, K.; Takamura, H.; and Matsumoto, Y. 2003. Incorporating contextual cues in trainable models for coreference resolution. In Proc. of the EACL Workshop on The Computational Treatment of Anaphora.
10. Joachims, T. 1999. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning. MIT Press. 44-56.
11. Kehler, A.; Appelt, D.; Taylor, L.; and Simma, A. 2004. The (non)utility of predicate-argument frequencies for pronoun interpretation. In Proc. of HLT/NAACL, 289-296.
12. Kennedy, C., and Boguraev, B. 1996. Anaphor for everyone: Pronominal anaphora resolution without a parser. In Proc. of COLING, 113-118.
13. Lappin, S., and Leass, H. 1994. An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics 20(4):535-562.
14. Lin, D. 1998. Dependency-based evaluation of MINIPAR. In Proc. of the LREC Workshop on the Evaluation of Parsing Systems, 48-56.
15. McCarthy, J., and Lehnert, W. 1995. Using decision trees for coreference resolution. In Proc. of UCAI, 1050-1055.
16. Mitkov, R. 2002. Anaphora Resolution. Longman.
17. Ng, V., and Cardie, C. 2002. Identifying anaphoric and non-anaphoric noun phrases to improve coreference resolution. In Proc. of COLING, 730-736.
18. Vieira, R., and Poesio, M. 2000. An empirically-based system for processing definite descriptions. Computational Linguistics, 26(4):539-593.
19. Soon, W. M.; Ng, H. T.; and Lim, D. C. Y. 2001. A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Computational Linguistics 27(4):521-544.
20. Strube, M. 1998. Never look back: An alternative to centering. In Proc. of COLING-ACL, 1251-1257.
21. Tetreault, J. 2001. A corpus-based evaluation of centering and pronoun resolution. Computational Linguistics 27(4):507-520.
22. Yang, X.; Zhou, G.; Su, J.; and Tan, C. L. 2003. Coreference resolution using competitive learning approach. In Proc. of the ACL, 176-183.
23. Yang, X.; Su, J.; Zhou, G.; and Tan, C. L. 2004. Improving pronoun resolution by incorporating coreferential information of candidates. In Proc. of the ACL, 128-135.