Coreference for NLP applications

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2000-October, Issue , 2000, Pages

  Morton, Thomas S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASELINE SYSTEMS; COREFERENCE; IMPROVE PERFORMANCE; PERFORMANCE; QUESTION ANSWERING SYSTEMS; REAL-WORLD; SIMPLE++;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84880871726     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Saliha Azzam, Kevin Humphreys, and Robert Gaizauskas. 1999. Using coreference chains for text summarization. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Coreference and Its Applications, College Park, Maryland, June.
2. Breck Baldwin and Thomas Morton. 1998. Dynamic coreference-based summarization. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Granada, Spain, June.
3. Breck Baldwin, Jeff Reynar, Mike Collins, Jason Eisner, Adwait Ratnaparki, Joseph Rosen-zweig, Anoop Sarkar, and Srinivas Bangalore. 1995. Description of the University of Pennsylvania system used for MUC-6. In Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6), Columbia, Maryland.
4. E. Breck, J. Burger, L. Ferro, D. House, M. Light, and I. Mani. 1999. A Sys called Qanda. In Proceedings of the Eighth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-8), Gaithersburg, Maryland, November. NIST.
5. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). 1995. Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6), Columbia, Maryland, November.
6. Niyu Ge, John Hale, and Eugene Charniak. 1998. A statistical approach to anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Very Large Corpora, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, August.
7. Jerry R. Hobbs. 1976. Pronoun resolution. Technical Report 76-1, City College, New York.
8. Shalom Lappin and Herbert J. Leass. 1994. An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics, pages 535-561.
9. M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. Marcinkiewicz. 1994. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
10. Ruslan Mitkov. 1997. Factors in anaphora resolution: They are not the only things that matter. A case study based on two different approaches. In Proceedings of the ACL '97/EACL '97 Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical Robust Anaphora Resolution.
11. Thomas Morton. 1999. Using coreference in question answering. In Proceedings of the Eighth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-8), Gaithersburg, Maryland, November. NIST.
12. Adwait Ratnaparkhi. 1996. A Maximum Entropy Part of Speech Tagger. In Proceeding of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, University of Pennsylvania, May 17-18.
13. Adwait Ratnaparkhi. 1997. A simple introduction to maximum entropy models for natural language processing. Technical Report 9708, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania.
14. Jeffrey C. Reynar and Adwait Ratnaparkhi. 1997. A maximum entropy approach to identifying sentence boundaries. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pages 16-19, Washington, D.C., April.
15. Jeff Reynar. 1998. Topic Segmentation: Algorithms and Applications. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
16. Amir Singal, Steve Abney, Michiel Bacchiani, Michael Collins, Donald Hindle, and Fernando Pereira. 1999. AT&T at TREC-8. In Proceedings of the Eighth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-8), Gaithersburg, Maryland, November. NIST.
17. Renata Vieira and Massimo Poesio. 1997. Processing definite descriptions in corpora. In Corpus-based and Computational Approaches to Discourse Anaphora. UCL Press.
18. Marc Vilain, John Burger, John Aberdeen, Dennis Connolly, and Lynette Hirschman. 1995. A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme. In Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6), Columbia, Maryland.
19. E. Voorhees and D. Tice. 1999. The TREC-8 question answering track evaluation. In Proceedings of the Eighth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-8), Gaithersburg, Maryland, November. NIST.