The influence of smokers' degree of dependence on the effectiveness of message framing for capturing smokers for a Quitline

Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 620-624

  Szklo, André Salem ^a   Coutinho, Evandro Silva Freire ^b  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CÂNCER   (Brazil)

^b INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Hotlines; Persuasive communication; Risk assessment; Smoking cessation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPNEA; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PREVALENCE; PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEM; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SMOKING CESSATION; SMOKING HABIT; TELECONSULTATION;

ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; BRAZIL; HEALTH PROMOTION; HOTLINES; HUMANS; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO USE DISORDER;

EID: 77649340927     PISSN: 03064603     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abramson J.H., and Gahlinger P.M. Computer programs for epidemiologists PEPI version 3.01 (1999), Brixton books, Powys, UK 172-179
2. Brendl S.M., Higgins E.T., and Lemm K. Sensitivity to varying gains and losses: The role of self-discrepancies and event framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (1995) 1028-1051
3. Chabrol H., Niezborala M., Chastan E., and de Leon J. Comparison of heavy smoking index and of the Fagestrom test for nicotine dependence in a sample of 749 cigarette smokers. Addictive Behaviors 30 7 (2005) 1474-1477
4. Chaiken S., and Maheswaran D. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 3 (1994) 460-473
5. Fagerstrom K., and Furberg H. A comparison of the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence and smoking prevalence across countries. Addiction 103 5 (2008) 841-845
6. Fiore M.C., Jaén C.R., Baker T.B., Bailey W.C., Benowitz N.L., Curry S.J., et al. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Clinical Practice Guideline (2008), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, USA 75-80
7. Friedman L.M., Furberg C.D., and DeMets D.L. Fundamentals of clinical trials (1998), Springer-Verlag, New York, NY 41-57
8. Glasgow R.E., Lichtenstein E., and Marcus A.C. Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health 93 (2003) 1261-1267
9. Heatherton T.F., Koslowski L.T., Frecker R.C., Rickert W., and Robinson J. Measuring the heaviness of smoking: Using self-reported time to first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day. British Journal of Addiction 84 (1989) 791-800
10. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE. Demographic census: Data grouped by census tracks of universe results. 2nd edition (2003), IBGE, Rio de Janeiro. http://www.ibge.gov.br/english/estatistica/populacao/defaulttab_agregado.shtm Retrieved December 15, 2009, from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/english/estatistica/populacao/defaulttab_agregado.shtm
11. Kleinjan M., van den Eijnden R.J.J.M., Dijkstra A., Brug J., and Engels R.C.M.E. Excuses to continue smoking: The role of disengagement beliefs in smoking cessation. Addictive Behaviors 31 (2006) 2223-2237
12. Latimer A.E., Salovey P., and Rothman A.J. The effectiveness of gain-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behavior: Is all hope lost?. Journal of Health Communication 12 (2007) 645-649
13. Lyna P., McBride C., Samsa G., and Pollak K.I. Exploring the association between perceived risk of smoking and benefits to quitting: Who does not see the link?. Addictive Behaviors 27 2 (2002) 293-307
14. Maheswaran D., and Meyers-Levy J. The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research 27 (1990) 361-367
15. Ministério da Saúde. Departamento de Ouvidoria Geral do SUS. Apresentação de dados do serviço Disque Pare de Fumar, ano 2007 [National Smoking Quitline Data Presentation, 2007]. Retrieved December 15, 2009, from: portal.saude.gov.br/portal/arquivos/pdf/relatorio_tematico_inca.pdf
16. Monteiro C.A., Cavalcante T., Moura E.C., Claro R.M., and Szwarcwald C.L. Population-based evidence of a strong decline in the prevalence of smokers in Brazil (1989-2003). Bulletin of the World Health Organization 85 (2007) 527-534
17. Moorman M., and Putte B.V.D. The influence of message framing, intention to quit smoking, and nicotine dependence on the persuasiveness of smoking cessation messages. Addictive Behaviors 33 10 (2008) 1267-1275
18. O'Keefe D.J., and Jensen J.D. The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication 12 (2007) 623-644
19. Orbell S., Perugini M., and Rakow T. Individual differences in sensitivity to health communications: Consideration for future consequences. Health Psychology 23 4 (2004) 388-396
20. Ossip-Klein D.J., Giovino G.A., Megahed N., Black P.M., Emont S.L., Stiggins J., et al. Effects of a smoker's hotline: Results of a 10-county self-help trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59 (1991) 325-332
21. Owen L. Impact of a telephone helpline for smokers who called during a mass media campaign. Tobacco Control 9 (2000) 148-154
22. Rothman A.J., and Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychology Bulletin 121 (1997) 3-19
23. Rothman K.J., Greenland S., and Walker A.M. Concepts of interaction. American Journal of Epidemiology 112 (1980) 467-470
24. Schneider T.R., Salovey P., Pallonen U., Mundorf N., Smith N.F., and Steward W. Visual and auditory message framing effects on tobacco smoking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31 (2001) 667-682
25. Szklo A.S., Coutinho E.S.F., Spitz R., and Gamba Jr. N. Gains of stopping smoking: Portraits of the dialogue between public health promotion, art and design. International Journal of Epidemiology 38 (2009) 1459-1463
26. Szklo A.S., and Otero U.B. Profile of smokers not searching for smoking cessation intervention in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Revista Saúde Publica 42 1 (2008) 139-142
27. Szklo M., and Nieto F.J. Epidemiology beyond the basics (2007), Jones & Bartlett Publishers, Mississauga, Canada 112-221
28. Toll B.A., O'Malley S.S., Katulak N.A., Wu R., Dubin J.A., Latimer A., et al. Comparing gain and loss framed messages for smoking cessation with sustained release bupropion: A randomized controlled trial. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 21 4 (2007) 534-544
29. Trumbo C.W. Heuristic-systematic information processing and risk judgment. Risk Analysis 19 (1999) 391-400
30. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. The framing of choices and the psychology of decision. Science 211 (1981) 453-458
31. Weinstein N.D., Slovic P., and Gibson G. Accuracy and optimism in smokers' beliefs about quitting. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 6 3 (2004) 375-380
32. Wilson D., Wakefield M., Owen N., and Roberts L. Characteristics of heavy smokers. Preventive Medicine 21 3 (1992) 311-319