Application of virtual reality to the rehabilitation field to aid amputee rehabilitation: Findings from a systematic review

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 136-142

  D'Angelo, M ^a   Narayanan, S ^a   Reynolds, D B ^a   Kotowski, S ^b   Page, S ^b  

^a Wright State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Amputees; Gait; Rehabilitation; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISABLED PERSON; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY;

AMPUTEES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 77649308928     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17483100903387622     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grise M. Tools to measure outcome of people with a lower limb amputation: Update on the PPA and LCI. J Prosthet Orthot 2006;18(1S):61.
2. Keshner E. Virtual realty and physical rehabilitation: a new toy or a new research and rehabilitation tool? J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004;1:8.
3. University of Pennsylvania Health System [Internet] Pittsburgh, Pa: PENN Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation; 2009 [cited Jan 17, 2009]; Available from: http://www.uphs. upenn.edu/rehabmed/historical/history-index.html
4. Pasquina PF, Bryant PR, Huang ME, Roberts TL, Nelson VS, Flood KM. Advances in amputee care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;74:292-300.
5. Sviestrup H. Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004;1:10-18.
6. Carozzo M, Lacquaniti F. Virtual reality: A tutorial. Electroen Clin Neurol 1998;109:1-9.
7. Gourlay D, Lun KC, Liya G. Review of virtual reality treatment for mental health. Medinfo 2001;10.1:820-834.
8. Moire JF, Iyer K, Luigi DP, Williams J, Dozois A, Rizzo AS. Development of a data management tool for investigating multivariate space and free will experiences in virtual reality. Appl Psychophys Biof 2005;30:319-331.
9. Rizzo A. Virtual reality and disability: Emergence and challenge. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:567-569.
10. Figuerora P, Bischof WF, Boulanger P, Hoover J. Efficient comparison of platform alternatives in interacgtive virtual reality applications. Int J Hum Comput Studies 2005;62:73-103.
11. Rizzo A. Virtual reality and disability: Emergence and challenge. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:567-569.
12. Weiss P, Ring H. Commentary on virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: Still more virtual than real. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1147-1149.
13. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychol Bull 1984;95:355-386.
14. Crosbie J, Lennon S, Brasford J, McDonough S. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: Still more virtual than real. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1139-1146.
15. Sisto S, Forrest GF, Glendinning D. Virtual reality applications for motor rehabilitation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2002;8:11-23.
16. Holden M. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: Review. Cyberpsycholo Behav 2005;8:187-211.
17. You SH, Jang SH, Kim YH, Hallet M, Ahn SH, Kwon YH, Kim JH, Lee MY. Virtual reality-induced cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in chronic stroke: An experimenter-blind randomized study. Stroke 2005;36:1166-1171.
18. Lamontagne A, Fung J, McFadyen BJ, Faubert J. Modulation of walking speed by changing optic flow in persons with stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007;4:22.
19. Deutsch J, Mireleman A. Virtual reality-based approaches to enable walking for people poststroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:45-53.
20. Dunning K, Levine P, Schmitt L, Israel S, Fulk G. An ankle to computer virtual reality system for improving gait and function in a person 9 months poststroke. Top Stoke Rehabil 2008;15:602-610.
21. Mirelman A, Bonato P, Deutsch J. Effects of training with a robot-virtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke. Stroke 2009;40:169-174.
22. Flynn S, Palma P, Bender A. Feasibility of using the Sony PlayStation 2 gaming platform for an individual poststroke: A case report. J Neurol Phys Ther 2007;31:180-189.
23. Yang YR, Tsai MP, Chuang TY, Sung WH, Want RY. Virtual reality-based training improves community ambulation in individuals with stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture. 2009;28:201-206.
24. Baram Y, Miller A. virtual reality cues for improvement of gait in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2006; 66:178-181.
25. Kendal MB, Ungerer G, Dorsett P. Bridging the gap: Transitional rehabilitation services with people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:1008-1015.
26. Oddsson LI, Karlsson R, Konrad J, Ince S, Williams SR, Zemkova E. A rehabilitation tool for functional balance using altered gravity and virtual reality. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007; 4:25.
27. Ohyama S, Nishiike S, Wantanabe H, Matsouka K, Takeda N. Effects of optokinetic stimulation induced by virtual reality on locomotion: A preliminary study. Acta Otolaryngol 2008; 128:1211-1214.
28. Koenig A, Wellner M, Koeneke S, Meyer-Heim A, Lunenburger L, Riener R. Virtual gait training for children with cerebral palsy using the Lokomat gait orthosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008;132:204-209.
29. Hesse S, Schmidt H, Werner C, Bardeleben A. Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control. Curr Opin Neurol 2003;16:705-710.
30. Fung J, Richards CL, Malouin F, McFadyen BJ, Lamontagne A. A treadmill and motion coupled virtual reality system for gait training post-stroke. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006;9:157-162.
31. Deutsch JE, Merians AS, Adamovich S, Poizner H, Burdea GC. Development and application of virtual reality technology to improve hand use and gait of individuals post-stroke. Neurol Neurosci 2004;22:371-386.
32. Fulk GD. Locomotor training and virtual reality-based balance training for an individual with multiple sclerosis: A case report. J Neurol Phys Ther 2005;29:34-42.