An exploratory case study of the preparation of secondary teachers to meet special education needs in the general classroom

Teacher Educator

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 238-256

  Gately, Susan ^a   Hammer, Christy ^b  

^a RIVIER COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649286928     PISSN: 08878730     EISSN: 19388101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08878730509555364     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Altrichter, H., and Posch, P., 1989. Does the grounded theory approach offer a guiding paradigm for teaching research?. Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(1):21–31.
2. Bennett, D., 1997. Providing role models online:Telementoring gives students real‐life connections in science and beyond. Electronic Learning, 16(5):50–51.
3. Charmaz, K., 1983. “ The grounded theory method:An explication and interpretation ”. In Contemporary field research:A book of readings, Edited by:Emerson, R. M., 109–126. Boston:Litde, Brown.
4. Deshler, D. D., and Lenz, K., 1989. The strategies instructional approach. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 36:57–65.
5. Deshler, D. D., Ellis, E. S., and Lenz, B. K., 1996. Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities, Denver, CO:Love.
6. Glaser, B., 1998. Doing grounded theory:Issues and discussions, Mill Valley, CA:Sociology Press.
7. Glatthorn, A. A., 1990. Cooperative professional development:Facilitating the growth of the special education teacher and the classroom teacher. Remedial and Special Education, 11:29–34.
8. Goodlad, J., 1984. A place called school, New York:McGraw‐Hill.
9. Hudson, P., Lignugaris‐Kraft, B., and Miller, T., 1993. Using content enhancement to improve the performance of adolescents with learning disabilities in content classes. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8:106–126.
10. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997. Pub. L. No.105–17, 20 Stat. 1401 (1999)
11. Jay, J. K., 2002. Meta, meta, meta:Modeling in a methods course for teaching English. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29:83–102.
12. Kame'enui, E. J., Carnine, D. W., Dixon, R. C., Simmons, D. C., and Coyne, M. D., 2002. Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners, Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill.
13. Malouf, D. B., and Schiller, E. P., 1995. The gap:Research into practice. Teaching Exceptional Children, 28(2):414–424.
14. Mastropieri, M., Scruggs, T., and Graetz, J. E., 2003. Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students:Challenges for struggling students and teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26:103–116.
15. Meyen, E. L., Vergason, G. A., and Whelan, R. J., 1998. Educating students with mild disabilities:Strategies and methods, (2nd ed.), Denver:Love.
16. Miller, S. P., Perkins, P., Suzuki, C., Odell, S., and McKinney, M., 2002. Linking research to practice within a secondary teacher preparation program. American Secondary Education, 31(1):2–26.
17. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002)
18. Pivik, J., McComas, J., and LaFlamme, M., 2002. Barriers and facilitators to inclusive education. Exceptional Children, 69:97–101.
19. Resta, V., Asians, B., and Hiding, L., 1999. Issues in secondary teacher preparation. The Teacher Educator, 35(1):57–67.
20. Rogan, J., 1997. Online mentoring:Reflections and suggestions. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 13(3):5–13.
21. Sanchez, B., 1996. Online mentoring‐A success story. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(8):57–60.
22. Sideridis, G. D., and Chandler, J. P., 1997. Assessment of teacher attitudes toward inclusion of students with disabilities:A confirmatory. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 14(1):51–65.
23. Swanson, H. L., 1999. Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities:Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14:129–140.
24. Swanson, H. L., and Deshler, D., 2003. Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities:Converting a meta‐analysis to practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(2):124–135.
25. Warner, M. M., Cheney, C. O., and Pienkowski, D., 1996. Guidelines for developing and evaluating programs of secondary students with mild disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 31(5):276–284.
26. Zigmond, N., and Baker, J., 1996. Full inclusion for students with learning disabilities:Too much of a good thing?. Theory Into Practice, 35(1):26–34.