User-centered virtual environment design for virtual rehabilitation

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Fidopiastis, Cali M ^a   Rizzo, Albert A ^b   Rolland, Jannick P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; QUALITY CONTROL; REHABILITATION; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; BENCHMARKING; HUMANS; MALE; REHABILITATION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 77649283947     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-7-11     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Virtual reality and cognitive assessment and rehabilitation: the state of the art. AA Rizzo JG Buckwalter, Virtual Reality in Neuro-Physiology Amsterdam, Netherlands, IOS Press, Riva G, 1997 123 146
2. A SWOT Analysis of the field of virtual rehabilitation and therapy. AA Rizzo GJ Kim, Presence 2005 14 2 119 146 10.1162/1054746053967094 (Pubitemid 40785667)
3. The application of virtual reality technology for rehabilitation. MT Schultheis AA Rizzo, Rehab Psychol 2001 46 3 296 311 10.1037/0090-5550.46.3.296
4. Virtual reality in brain damage rehabilitation: Review. FD Rose BM Brooks AA Rizzo, CyberPsychol & Behav 2005 8 3 241 262 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.241 15971974
5. Training in Virtual Environments: transfer to real world tasks and equivalence to real task training. FD Rose EA Attree BM Brooks DM Parslow PR Penn N Ambihapahan, Ergonomics 2000 43 494 511 10.1080/001401300184378 10801083
6. Human experience modeler: Context-driven cognitive retraining to facilitate transfer of learning. CM Fidopiastis CB Stapleton JD Whiteside CE Hughes SM Fiore GM Martin JP Rolland EM Smith, CyberPsychol & Behav 2006 9 2 183 187 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.183 16640476
7. Virtual environment applications in clinical Neuropsychology. AA Rizzo JG Buckwalter C Van der Zaag, Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation, and application Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Stanney K, 2002 1027 1063
8. Development of a benchmarking scenario for testing 3D user interface devices and interaction methods. AA Rizzo GJ Kim SC Yeh M Thiebaux J Hwang G Buckwalter, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction. Las Vegas, Nevada 2005
9. Video capture virtual reality as a flexible and effective rehabilitation tool. PL Weiss D Rand N Katz R Kizony, J of NeuroEng and Rehab 2004 1 1
10. A virtual reality scenario for all seasons: the virtual classroom. AA Rizzo T Bowerly JG Buckwalter D Klimchuk R Mitura TD Parsons, CNS Spectrum 2006 11 1 35 44
11. Virtual reality in cognitive retraining. RM Moreira da Costa LA Vidal de Carvalho, Proceedings of IWALT 2000, the International Workshop on Advanced Learning Technology Palmerston North, New Zealand, 4-6 December, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society 2000 221 224
12. ISO 13407- Human-centered design processes for interactive systems. ISO, International Organization for Standardization 1999
13. Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. J Preece Y Rogers H Sharp, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons 2002
14. Re-viewing reality: Human factors of synthetic training environments. AW Stedmon RJ Stone, Int Jof Human-Computer Studies 2001 55 675 698 10.1006/ijhc.2001.0498
15. Applications of virtual environments in medicine. G Riva, Meth of Inform in Med 2003 42 524 534
16. Realizing the full potential of virtual reality: human factors issues that could stand in the way. KM Stanney, Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '95, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina March 11-15, 1995 28 32
17. What does virtual reality NEED?: Human factors issues in the design of three-dimensional computer environments. JP Wann M Mon-Williams, Intl J of Human-Computer Studies 1996 44 829 847 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0035 (Pubitemid 126369934)
18. Towards a design methodology for virtual environments. C Fencott, Poster presented at the User Centered Design and Implementation Workshop September 30, York England 1999 http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/hci/kings-manor-workshops/UCDIVE/
19. Interacting with virtual environments: an evaluation of a model of interaction. K Kaur N Maiden A Sutcliffe, Interacting with Computers 1999 11 403 426 10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00059-9
20. A survey of usability evaluation in virtual environments: Classification and comparison of methods. DA Bowman JL Gabbard D Hix, Presence 2000 11 4 404 424 10.1162/105474602760204309
21. Human factors issues in virtual environments: A review of the literature. KM Stanney RR Mourant RS Kennedy, Presence 1998 7 4 327 351 10.1162/105474698565767
22. Usability engineering of virtual environments (Ves): identifying multiple criteria that drive effective VE system design. KM Stanney M Mollaghasemi R Leah R Breau DA Graeber, Intl J of Human-Computer Studies 2003 588 447 481 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00015-6
23. Methodology for the iterative evaluation of prototype head-mounted displays in virtual environments: visual acuity metrics. CM Fidopiastis C Furhman C Meyer JP Rolland, Presence 2005 14 5 550 562 10.1162/ 105474605774918697
24. Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. JP Wann S Rushton M Mon-Williams, Vision Research 1995 35 19 2731 2736 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00018-U 7483313
25. The science of virtual reality and virtual environments: a technical, scientific and engineering reference on virtual environments. RS Kalawsky, Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley 1993
26. E Melzer K Moffit, Head Mounted Displays: Designing for the User New York, NY: McGraw-Hill 1997
27. User-centered design in the trenches: Head-mounted display system design and user performance. RG Eggelston, Head Mounted Displays: Designing for the user New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Melzer JE, Moffit K, 1997 17 54
28. HMD Image source, optics, and the visual interface. HL Task, Head Mounted Displays: Designing for the user New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Melzer JE, Moffit K, 1997 55 82
29. Vision and Virtual Reality. JG May DR Badcock, Handbook of Virtual Environments Technology Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Stanney KM, 2002 29 63
30. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The interaction, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. JE Cutting PM Vishton, Perception of space and motion San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Epstein W, Rogers S, 1995 69 117
31. Seeing. SR Ellis, Pictorial communication in virtual and real environment Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, Ellis SR, Kaiser MK, Grunwald AJ, 1993 419 424
32. Toward quantifying depth and size perception in virtual environments. JP Rolland W Gibson D Ariely, Presence 1995 4 24 49
33. Methods of adjustments versus method of constant stimuli in the quantification of accuracy and precision of rendered depth in head-mounted displays. JP Rolland C Meyer K Arthur E Rinalducci, Presence 2002 11 6 610 625 10.1162/105474602321050730 (Pubitemid 36103494)
34. Optical versus video see-through head-mounted displays in medical visualization. J Rolland H Fuchs, Presence 2001 9 3 287 309 10.1162/ 105474600566808
35. Enabling a continuum of virtual environment experiences. L Davis JP Rolland F Hamza-Lup Y Ha, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 2003 2 4
36. Head-mounted display systems. JP Rolland H Hua, Encyclopedia of Optical Engineering New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Driggers RG, 2005 1 13
37. DA Goss RW West, Introduction to the optics of the eye Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann 2001
38. User-centered virtual environment assessment and design for cognitive rehabilitation applications. CM Fidopiastis, PhD dissertation, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL. Dissertations & Theses database 2006 (Publication No. AAT 3233649)
39. Head-worn displays: a review. O Cakmakci J Rolland, IEEE/OSA Journal of Display Technology 2006 2 3 199 216 10.1109/JDT.2006.879846 (Pubitemid 44321637)
40. M Velger, Helmet-mounted Displays and Sights Boston, MA: Artech House, Inc 1998
41. Multifocal planes head-mounted displays. JP Rolland MW Kreuger A Goon, Applied Optics 2000 39 19 3209 3215 10.1364/AO.39.003209 18349886
42. A computational model for the stereoscopic optics of a head-mounted display. W Robinett JP Rolland, Presence 1992 1 1 45 62
43. Assessment of visual performance. MA Bullimore PA Howarth J Fulton, Evaluation of human work: a practical ergonomics methodology Nottingham, U.K.: Taylor & Francis, Wilson JR, Corlett EN, 1995 804 839
44. RW Reading, Binocular Vision: Foundations and Applications Boston, MA: Butterworth Publishers 1983
45. Stereoacuity at distance and near. BP Wong RL Woods E Peli, Opt and Vis Sci 2002 79 12 771 778 10.1097/00006324-200212000-00009 (Pubitemid 36015142)
46. Visual optics and the optical space sense. KN Ogle, The Eye New York, NY: Academic Press, Davidson H, 1962 4 271 324
47. Effect of binocular variations of Snellen's visual acuity on Titmus stereoacuity. PB Donzis JA Rapazzo RM Burde M Gordon, Arch Opthalmol 1983 101 930 932
48. Stereoacuity degradation by experimental and real monocular and binocular amblyopia. RT Goodwin PE Romano, Invest Ophthal Visual Science 1985 26 917 923
49. Randot stereoacuity at various binocular combinations of Snellen acuity. V Menon A Bansal P Prakash, Indian J of Opthal 1997 45 3 169 171
50. The use of virtual reality exposure in the treatment of anxiety disorders. BO Rothbaum LF Hodges, Behav Mod 1999 23 4 507 525 10.1177/0145445599234001 (Pubitemid 29441642)
51. The effectiveness of virtual reality based pain control with multiple treatments. HG Hoffman DR Patterson GJ Carrougher S Sharar, Clin J of Pain 2001 17 3 229 235 10.1097/00002508-200109000-00007 (Pubitemid 32906542)