Stereoacuity at distance and near

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 79, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 771-778

  Wong, Bonita P H ^a   Woods, Russell L ^b   Peli, Eli ^a,b  

^a NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

^b SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Distance; Proximity; Stereoacuity

Indexed keywords

ERROR DETECTION; PRISMS; REFRACTION;

STEREOACUITY;

BINOCULAR VISION;

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMANS; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; VISION TESTS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0346037255     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200212000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Reading RW. Binocular Vision: Foundations and Applications. Boston: Butterworth, 1983.
2. Steinman SB, Steinman BA, Garzia RP. Foundations of Binocular Vision: A Clinical Perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000.
3. Manny RE, Martinez AT, Fern KD. Testing stereopsis in the pre-school child: Is it clinically useful? J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1991;28:223-31.
4. Julesz B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.
5. Fricke T, Siderov J. Non-stereoscopic cues in the Random-Dot E stereotest: Results for adult observers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1997;17:122-7.
6. Harvey LO Jr. Critical flicker frequency as a function of viewing distance, stimulus size and luminance. Vision Res 1970;10:55-63.
7. Freeman E. Anomalies of visual acuity in relation to stimulus-distance. J Opt Soc Am 1923;22:285-92.
8. Gonzalez F, Rivadulla C, Perez R, Cadarso C. Depth perception in random dot stereograms is not affected by changes in either vergence or accommodation. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:743-7.
9. Fry GA, Kent PR. The effects of base-in and base-out prisms on stereo-acuity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1944;21:492-507.
10. Trotter Y, Celebrini S, Stricanne B, Thorpe S, Imbert M. Modulation of neural stereoscopic processing in primate area V1 by the viewing distance. Science 1992;257:1279-81.
11. Jiménez JR, Rubino M, Diaz JA, Hita E, del Barco LJ. Changes in stereoscopic depth perception caused by decentration of spectacle lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:421-7.
12. Ogle KN. Note on stereoscopic acuity and viewing distance. J Opt Soc Am 1958;48:794-8.
13. Amigo G. Variation of stereoscopic acuity with observation distance. J Opt Soc Am 1963;53:630-5.
14. Brown JP, Ogle KN, Reiher L. Stereoscopic acuity and observation distance. Invest Ophthalmol 1965;4:894-900.
15. Lit A, Finn JP. Variability of depth-discrimination thresholds as a function of observation distance. J Opt Soc Am 1976;66:740-2.
16. Zanoni D, Rosenbaum AL. A new method for evaluating distance stereo acuity. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1991;28:255-60.
17. Yildirim C, Altinsoy HI, Yakut E. Distance stereoacuity norms for the mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester in young children and young adults. J Aapos 1998;2:26-32.
18. Carlson NB, Kurtz D, Heath DA, Hines C. Clinical Procedures for Ocular Examinations, 2nd Ed. Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1996.
19. Fruböse A, Jaensch PA. Der einfluss verschiedener faktoren auf die tiefensehscharfe. Ztschr Biol 1923;78:119-32.
20. Jameson D, Hurvich LM. Note on factors influencing the relation between stereoscopic acuity and observation distance. J Opt Soc Am 1959;49:639.
21. Kaye SB, Siddiqui A, Ward A, Noonan C, Fisher AC, Green JR, Brown MC, Wareing PA, Watt P. Monocular and binocular depth discrimination thresholds. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:770-82.
22. Sheedy JE. Fixation disparity analysis ofoculomotor imbalance. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1980;57:632-9.
23. Garzia RP, Dyer G. Effect of nearpoint stress on the horizontal forced vergence fixation disparity curve. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986;63:901-7.
24. Howard IP, Rogers BJ. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
25. Peli E. The visual effects of head-mounted display (HMD) are not distinguishable from those of desk-top computer display. Vision Res 1998;38:2053-66.