Dynamic modeling and analyses of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process to produce bio-ethanol from rice straw

Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 195-205

  Ko, Jordon ^a   Su, Wen Jun ^b   Chien, I Lung ^a   Chang, Der Ming ^b   Chou, Sheng Hsin ^c   Zhan, Rui Yu ^c  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b DA YEH UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY RESEARCH   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Bio ethanol; Cellulase hydrolysis; Cybernetic model; SSF; Yeast fermentation

Indexed keywords

BATCH OPERATION; CYBERNETIC MODELS; DYNAMIC EFFECTS; DYNAMIC MODELING; ETHANOL CONCENTRATIONS; ETHANOL INHIBITION; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FERMENTATION PROCESS; KINETIC MODELS; OPERATING VARIABLES; PROCESS STEPS; PROCESSING TIME; RICE STRAWS; SEPARATE HYDROLYSIS AND FERMENTATION; SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION AND FERMENTATION; YEAST FERMENTATION;

AGRICULTURAL WASTES; BIOETHANOL; CELLULOSE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ETHANOL; FEEDSTOCKS; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; PROCESS CONTROL; SACCHARIFICATION; YEAST;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS;

BIOETHANOL; BIOMATERIAL; CELLULASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AGRICULTURAL WASTE; ARTICLE; FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS KINETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RICE STRAW; SACCHARIFICATION;

BIOMASS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELLULOSE; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FUNGI; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; KINETICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ORYZA SATIVA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS;

AERATION; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; ENZYMES; ENZYMOLYSIS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; PLANT RESIDUES; PROCESS CONTROL; SACCHARIFICATION; YEASTS;

EID: 77649233023     PISSN: 16157591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-009-0313-1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. AE Farrell RJ Plevin BT Turner AD Jones M O'Hare DM Kammen 2006 Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals Science 311 506 508 10.1126/science.1121416 10.1126/science.1121416 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XmvVynuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43157725)
2. Dumitriu S (1998) Polysaccharides. Markker Dekker, New York
3. Takagi M, Abe S, Suzuki S, Emert GH, Yata N (1977) A method for production of alcohol direct from cellulose using cellulase and yeast. In: Process bioconversion symposium, pp 551-571
4. GP Philippidis TK Smith CE Wyman 1993 Study of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose for production of fuel ethanol by the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process Biotechnol Bioeng 41 846 853 10.1002/bit.260410903 10.1002/bit.260410903 1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXitlOmt7w%3D
5. TK Ghose PK Roychoudhury P Ghosh 1984 Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of lignocellulosics to ethanol under vacuum cycling and step feeding Biotechnol Bioeng 26 377 381 10.1002/bit.260260414 10.1002/bit.260260414 1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXhsleisb0%3D
6. B Hahn-Hägerdal M Galbe MF Gorwa-Grauslund G Lidén G Zacchi 2006 Bio-ethanol-the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today Trends Biotechnol 24 549 556 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.10.004 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.10. 004 (Pubitemid 44781248)
7. DDY Ryu SB Lee T Tassinari C Macy 1982 Effect of compression milling on cellulose structure and on enzymatic hydrolysis kinetics Biotechnol Bioeng 24 1047 1067 10.1002/bit.260240503 10.1002/bit.260240503 1:CAS:528: DyaL38XhvFGrs70%3D
8. YP Zhang LR Lynd 2004 Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems Biotechnol Bioeng 88 797 824 10.1002/bit.20282 10.1002/bit.20282 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVOitrjE (Pubitemid 40003769)
9. AA Huang 1975 Kinetic studies on insoluble cellulose-cellulase system Biotechnol Bioeng 17 1421 1433 10.1002/bit.260171003 10.1002/bit.260171003 1:CAS:528:DyaE28XktVWqtg%3D%3D
10. M Okazaki M Moo-Young 1978 Kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: analytical description of a mechanistic model Biotechnol Bioeng 20 637 663 10.1002/bit.260200503 10.1002/bit.260200503 1:CAS:528:DyaE1cXktFyksbc%3D (Pubitemid 8324169)
11. Q Gan SJ Allen G Taylor 2003 Kinetic dynamics in heterogeneous enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: an overview, an experimental study and mathematical modeling Process Biochem 38 1003 1018 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00220-0 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjsVeisbc%3D (Pubitemid 36639377)
12. YP Zhang LR Lynd 2006 A functionally based model for hydrolysis of cellulose by fungal cellulase Biotechnol Bioeng 94 888 898 10.1002/bit.20906 10.1002/bit.20906 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XntFGju70%3D (Pubitemid 44186896)
13. S Peri S Karra YY Lee MN Karim 2007 Modeling intrinsic kinetics of enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis Biotechnol Prog 23 626 637 10.1021/bp060322s 10.1021/bp060322s 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXks1Klt70%3D (Pubitemid 46911187)
14. F Xu H Ding 2007 A new kinetic model for heterogeneous (or spatially confined) enzymatic catalysis: contributions from the fractal and jamming (overcrowding) effects Appl Catal A Gen 317 70 81 10.1016/j.apcata.2006.10.014 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xhtlaiur%2FI (Pubitemid 44894818)
15. B Sonneleitner O Käppeli 1986 Growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by its limited respiration capacity: formulation and verification of a hypothesis Biotechnol Bioeng 28 927 937 10.1002/bit.260280620 10.1002/bit.260280620
16. P Dhurjati D Ramakrishna MC Flickinger GT Tsao 1985 A cybernetic view of microbial growth: modeling cells as optimal strategists Biotechnol Bioeng 27 1 9 10.1002/bit.260270102 10.1002/bit.260270102 1:CAS:528:DyaL2MXhtlSnsLk%3D (Pubitemid 15144379)
17. DS Kompala D Ramkrishna NB Jansen GT Tsao 1986 Investigation of bacterial growth on mixed substrates: experimental evaluation of cybernetic models Biotechnol Bioeng 28 1044 1055 10.1002/bit.260280715 10.1002/bit.260280715 1:CAS:528:DyaL28XkslOmtro%3D
18. C Pertev M Türker R Berber 1997 Dynamic modeling, sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation of industrial yeast fermenters Comput Chem Eng 21 S739 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjslWnsbs%3D
19. M Di Serio R Tesser E Santacesaria 2001 A kinetic and mass transfer model to simulate the growth of baker's yeast in industrial bioreactors Chem Eng J 82 347 354 10.1016/S1385-8947(00)00353-3 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXhvFKhu7Y%3D (Pubitemid 32325096)
20. R Thatipamala S Rohani GA Hill 1992 Effects of high product and substrate inhibitions on the kinetics and biomass and product yields during ethanol batch fermentation Biotechnol Bioeng 40 289 297 10.1002/bit.260400213 10.1002/bit.260400213 1:CAS:528:DyaK38XksVKlt7s%3D
21. Chen WH, Chen SS, Hwang WS, Men LC, Wang JB (2008) Method for increasing the concentration of xylose in lignocellulosic hydrolysate. (applied to US patent office 12/207.004)
22. GL Miller 1959 Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar Anal Chem 31 426 428 10.1021/ac60147a030 1:CAS:528: DyaG1MXmtFKiuw%3D%3D
23. M Di Serio P Aramo E de Alteriis R Tesser E Santacesaria 2003 Quantitative analysis of the key factors affecting yeast growth Ind Eng Chem Res 42 5109 5116 10.1021/ie030078z 10.1021/ie030078z 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXntlyktb0%3D
24. Constantinides A, Mostoufi N (1999) Numerical methods for chemical engineers with MATLAB applications. Prentice-Hill, New Jersey. pp 449-529
25. JL Hjersted MA Henson 2006 Optimization of fed-batch Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation using dynamic flux balance models Biotechnol Prog 22 1239 1248 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xnsl2rt7o%3D