Force transmission of one- And two-piece morse-taper oral implants: A nonlinear finite element analysis

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 481-489

  Çehreli, Murat Cavit ^a,b   Akça, Kivanç ^a   Iplikçioǧlu, Haldun ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Gazi Mustafa Kemal Bulvari   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bone; Force transfer; Implant design; Morse taper; One piece implant; Two piece implant

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ACRYLIC CEMENT;

ARTICLE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FORCE; IMPLANT; MODEL; SOLID; STRESS; WEIGHT BEARING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 4644350527     PISSN: 09057161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01025.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abkowitz, S., Burke, J.J. & Hiltz, R.H. (1995) Titanium in industry. New York: Van Nostrand Co. Inc.
2. Akca, K., Cehreli, M.C. & Iplikcioglu, H. (2002) Comparison of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis with in-vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants. International Journal of Prosthodontics 15: 115-121.
3. Akca, K., Cehreli, M.C. & Iplikcioglu, H. (2003) Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant: a non-linear finite element stress analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research 14: 444-455.
4. Albrektsson, T., Brånemark, P.-I., Hansson, H.-A. & Lindström, J. (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implant. Requirements for long lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavia 52: 155-170.
5. Brånemark, P.-I., Engstrand, P., Öhmell, L.-O., Gröndahl, K., Nilsson, P., Hagberg, K., Darle, C. &. Lekholm, U. (1999) Brånemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 1: 2-16.
6. Brunski, J.B. (1988) Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 3: 85-97.
7. Buser, D., Schenk, R.K., Steinemann, S., Fiorellini, J.P., Fox, C.H. & Stich, H. (1991) Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 25: 889-902.
8. Buser, D., Schroeder, A., Sutter, F. & Lang, N.P. (1988) The new concept of ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants: Part 2. clinical aspects, indications, and early clinical results. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 3: 173-181.
9. Cehreli, M., Duyck, J., De Cooman, M., Puers, R. & Naert, I. (2004) Implant design and interface force transfer: a photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research 15: 249-257.
10. Engquist, B., Åstrand, P., Dahlgren, S., Engquist, E., Feldmann, H. & Grondahl, K. (2002) Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: a prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 13: 30-37.
11. Esposito, M., Hirsch, J.-M., Lekholm, U. & Thompsen, P. (1998) Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants (II) Etiopathogenesis. European Journal of Oral Sciences 106: 721-764.
12. Hansson, S. (1999) The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clinical Oral Implants Research 10: 394-405.
13. Heydenrijk, K., Raghoebar, G.M., Meijer, H.J.A., van der Reijden, W.A., van Winkelhoff, A.J. & Stegenga, B. (2002) Two-stage IMZ implants and ITI implants inserted in a single stage procedure. A prospective comparative study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 13: 371-380.
14. Kasemo, B. & Lausma, J. (1988) Biomaterial and implant surfaces: a surface science approach. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 3: 247-259.
15. Kieswetter, K., Schwartz, Z., Dean, D.D. & Boyan, B.D. (1996) The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine 7: 329-345.
16. Merz, B.R., Hunenbart, S. & Belser, U.C. (2000) Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 15: 519-526.
17. Moberg, L.E., Kondell, P.A., Sagulin, G.B., Bolin, A., Heimdahl, A. & Gynther, G.W. (2001) Brånemark system and ITI dental implant system for treatment of mandibular edentulism. A comparative randomized study: 3-year follow-up. Clinical Oral Implants Research 12: 450-461.
18. Möllersten, L., Lockowandt, P. & Linden, L.-A. (1997) Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: an in vitro test. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 78: 582-591.
19. Norton, M.R. (1997) An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint design. Clinical Oral Implants Research 8: 290-298.
20. Norton, M.R. (2000) In vitro evaluation of the strength of the conical implant-to-abutment joint in two commercially available implant systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 83: 567-571.
21. Pilliar, R.M., Lee, J.M. & Maniatopoulos, C. (1986) Observation of the effect of movement on the bone ingrowth into porous surfaced implants. Clinical Orthopaedics 208: 108-113.
22. Sakaguchi, R.L. & Borgersen, S.E. (1995) Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 10: 295-302.
23. Schwarz, M.S. (2000) Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 11: 156-158.
24. Shigley, J.E., ed. (1986) Mechanical engineering design, 194-196. New York: McGraw Hill.
25. Simmons, C.A., Meguid, S.A. & Pilliar, R.M. (2001) Differences in osseointegration rate due to implant surface geometry can be explained by local tissue strains. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 19: 187-194.
26. van Steenberghe, D., De Mars, G., Quirynen, M., Jacobs, R. & Naert, I. (2000) A prospective split-mouth comparative study of two screw-shaped self-tapping pure titanium implant systems. Clinical Oral Implants Research 11: 202-209.
27. Szmukler-Moncler, S., Salama, H., Reingewirtz, Y. & Dubruille, J.H. (1998) Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 43: 192-203.
28. Thomas, K.A. & Cook, S.D. (1985) An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 19: 875-901.
29. Wennerberg, A., Albrektsson, T., Andersson, B. & Krol, J.J. (1995 ) A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clinical Oral Implants Research 6: 24-30.
30. Wiskott, H.W. & Belser, U.C. (1999) Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: a working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. Clinical Oral Implants Research 10: 429-444.