Biological relevance of ion energy in performance of human endothelial cells on ion-implanted flexible polyurethane surfaces

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 258-268

  Özkucur, Nurdan ^a   Richter, E ^b   Wetzel, C ^c   Funk, R H W ^a   Monsees, T K ^a,d  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF ION BEAM PHYSICS AND MATERIALS RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR MATERIAL AND BEAM TECHNOLOGY IWS   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Biocompatibility; HUVECs; Ion implantation; Polyurethane

Indexed keywords

APOPTOSIS RATES; CLINICAL USE; ENERGY WINDOWS; FLEXIBLE POLYURETHANES; HUMAN ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; HUMAN UMBILICAL VEIN ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; HUVECS; IN-VITRO; ION DOSE; ION ENERGIES; ION IRRADIATION; MATERIAL SURFACE; N IMPLANTATION; SMALL-DIAMETER; SURFACE EROSION; VASCULAR TISSUE ENGINEERING; WORK OF ADHESION;

ADHESION; ARGON; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESES; CELL ADHESION; CELL DEATH; ELECTRON BEAMS; ION BOMBARDMENT; ION IMPLANTATION; OXYGEN; SELF ASSEMBLY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ENDOTHELIAL CELLS;

ARGON; CARBON; ION; NITROGEN; OXYGEN; POLYURETHAN;

APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL DENSITY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRON BEAM; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; ENERGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMPLANTATION; IRRADIATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; UMBILICAL VEIN;

APOPTOSIS; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLS, CULTURED; CULTURE MEDIA; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; HUMANS; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; IONS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; PLIABILITY; POLYURETHANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 77649197354     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32541     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Greenwald SE, Berry CL. Improving vascular grafts: The importance of mechanical and haemodynamic properties. J Pathol 2000;190:292-299.
2. Salacinski HJ, Goldner S, Giudiceandrea A, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM, Edwards A, Carson RJ. The mechanical behavior of vascular grafts: A review. J Biomater Appl 2001;15:241-278.
3. Tai NR, Salacinski HJ, Edwards A, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM. Compliance properties of conduits used in vascular reconstruction. Br J Surg 2000;87:1516-1524.
4. Mandarino MP, Salvatore JE. Polyurethane polymer (ostamer): Its use in fractured and diseased bones; experimental results. Surg Forum 1958;9:762-765.
5. Akutsu T, Dreyer B, Kolff WJ. Polyurethane artificial heart valves in animals. J Appl Physiol 1959;14:1045-1048.
6. Dreyer B, Akutsu T, Kolff WJ. Aortic grafts of polyurethane in dogs. J Appl Physiol 1960;15:18-22.
7. Wang DA, Ji J, Sun YH, Shen JC, Feng LX, Elisseeff JH. In situ immobilization of proteins and RGD peptide on polyurethane surfaces via poly(ethylene oxide) coupling polymers for human endothelial cell growth. Biomacromolecules 2002;3:1286-1295.
8. Doi K, Matsuda T. Enhanced vascularization in a microporous polyurethane graft impregnated with basic fibroblast growth factor and heparin. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;34:361-370.
9. Zhu Y, Gao C, Guan J, Shen J. Engineering porous polyurethane scaffolds by photografting polymerization of methacrylic acid for improved endothelial cell compatibility. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:1367-1373.
10. Zhu Y, Gao C, Guan J, Shen J. Promoting the cytocompatibility of polyurethane scaffolds via surface photo-grafting polymerization of acrylamide. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:283-289.
11. Kawamoto Y, Nakao A, Ito Y, Wada N, Kaibara M. Endothelial cells on plasma-treated segmented-polyurethane: Adhesion strength, antithrombogenicity and cultivation in tubes. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1997;8:551-557.
12. De S, Sharma R, Trigwell S, Laska B, Ali N, Mazumder MK, Mehta JL. Plasma treatment of polyurethane coating for improving endothelial cell growth and adhesion. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2005;16:973-989.
13. Gao C, Guan J, Zhu Y, Shen J. Surface immobilization of bioactive molecules on polyurethane for promotion of cytocompatibility to human endothelial cells. Macromol Biosci 2003;3:157-162.
14. McMillan R, Meeks B, Bensebaa F, Deslandes Y, Sheardown H. Cell adhesion peptide modification of gold-coated polyurethanes for vascular endothelial cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;54:272-283.
15. Hsu SH, Tang CM, Tseng HJ. Biostability and biocompatibility of poly(ester urethane)-gold nanocomposites. Acta Biomater 2008;4:1797-1808.
16. Chou CW, Hsu SH, Wang PH. Biostability and biocompatibility of poly(ether)urethane containing gold or silver nanoparticles in a porcine model. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;84:785-794.
17. Campos E, Cordeiro R, Alves P, Rasteiro MG, Gil MH. Polyurethane-based microparticles: Formulation and influence of processes variables on its characteristics. J Microencapsul 2008;25:154-169.
18. Heijkants RG, van Calck RV, van Tienen TG, de Groot JH, Pennings AJ, Buma P, Veth RP, Schouten AJ. Polyurethane scaffold formation via a combination of salt leaching and thermally induced phase separation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;87:921-932.
19. Grenier S, Sandig M, Mequanint K. Polyurethane biomaterials for fabricating 3D porous scaffolds and supporting vascular cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;82:802-809.
20. Lee JS, Kaibara M, Iwaki M, Sasabe H, Suzuki Y, Kusakabe M. Selective adhesion and proliferation of cells on ionimplanted polymer domains. Biomaterials 1993;14:958-960.
21. Bambauer R, Mestres P, Schiel R, Klinkmann J, Sioshansi P. Surface-treated catheters with ion beam-based process evaluation in rats. Artif Organs 1997;21:1039-1041.
22. Santerre JP, Woodhouse K, Laroche G, Labow RS. Understanding the biodegradation of polyurethanes: from classical implants to tissue engineering materials. Biomaterials 2005;26:7457-7470.
23. Morawietz H, Talanow R, Szibor M, Rueckschloss U, Schubert A, Bartling B, Darmer D, Holtz J. Regulation of the endothelin system by shear stress in human endothelial cells. J Physiol 2000;525 (Pt 3):761-770.
24. Andrews KD, Hunt JA. Upregulation of matrix and adhesion molecules induced by controlled topography. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008;19:1601-1608.
25. Zhu Y, Gao C, He T, Shen J. Endothelium regeneration on luminal surface of polyurethane vascular scaffold modified with diamine and covalently grafted with gelatin. Biomaterials 2004;25:423-430.
26. Melnig V, Apetroaei N, Dumitrascu N, Suzuki Y, Tura V. Improvement of polyurethane surface biocompatibility by plasma and ion beam techniques. J Optoelectron Adv Mater 2005;7:2521-2528.
27. Kusakabe M, Suzuki Y, Nakao A, Kaibara M, Iwaki M, Scholl M. Control of endothelial cell adhesion to polymer surface by ion implantation. Polym Adv Technol 2001;12:453-460.
28. Pignataro B, Conte E, Scandurra A, Marletta G. Improved cell adhesion to ion beam-irradiated polymer surfaces. Biomaterials 1997;18:1461-1470.
29. Xu G, Hibino Y, Suzuki Y, Tanihara M, Imanishi Y. Surface modification of polymers by ion implantation for biocompatible materials: Relations of platelet adhesion to irradiation effects. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2001;12:510-514.
30. Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 1997;276:1425-1428.
31. Li L, Backer J, Wong AS, Schwanke EL, Stewart BG, Pasdar M. Bcl-2 expression decreases cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion. J Cell Sci 2003;116 (Pt 18):3687-3700.
32. Galle J, Loeffler M, Drasdo D. Modeling the effect of deregulated proliferation and apoptosis on the growth dynamics of epithelial cell populations in vitro. Biophys J 2005;88:62-75.
33. Lampin M, Warocquier C, Legris C, Degrange M, Sigot-Luizard MF. Correlation between substratum roughness and wettability, cell adhesion, and cell migration. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:99-108.
34. Miller DC, Thapa A, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell function on poly(lactic-coglycolic acid) with nano-structured surface features. Biomaterials 2004;25:53-61.
35. Smith R, Oliver C, Williams DF. The enzymatic degradation of polymers in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:991-1003.
36. Phillips RE, Smith MC, Thoma RJ. Biomedical applications of polyurethanes: Implications of failure mechanisms. J Biomater Appl 1988;3:207-227.
37. Karapinar K, Ulus AT, Tutun U, Aksoyek A, Apaydin N, Pamuk K, Can Z, Saritas Z, Kucukay F, Arda K, Katircioglu SF. Implantation of novel small-diameter polyurethane vascular prostheses interposed in canine femoral and carotid arteries. Eur Surg Res 2004;36:241-248.
38. Miyamoto K, Sugimoto T, Okada M, Maeda S. Usefulness of polyurethane for small-caliber vascular prostheses in comparison with autologous vein graft. J Artif Organs 2002;5:113-116.
39. Seifalian AM, Tiwari A, Hamilton G, Salacinski HJ. Improving the clinical patency of prosthetic vascular and coronary bypass grafts: The role of seeding and tissue engineering. Artif Organs 2002;26:307-320.
40. Tiwari A, Salacinski HJ, Punshon G, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM. Development of a hybrid cardiovascular graft using a tissue engineering approach. FASEB J 2002;16:791-796.
41. Mathew A, Sreenivasan K, Mohanan P, Kumary T, Mohanty M. Polyurethane degradation in the biological milieu. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2006;19:115-121.
42. Ozkucur N, Wetzel C, Hollstein F, Richter E, Funk RH, Monsees TK. Physical vapor deposition of zirconium or titanium thin films on flexible polyurethane highly support adhesion and physiology of human endothelial cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;89A:57-67.
43. Wetzel C, Hollstein F, Funk R, Özkucur N, Monsees T. Investigation on zirconium-coated polyurethane surfaces with regards to biocompatibility. Surf Coat Tech 2008;202:5728-5732.