Implantation of novel small-diameter polyurethane vascular prostheses interposed in canine femoral and carotid arteries

European Surgical Research

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 241-248

  Karapinar, K ^a   Ulus, A T ^b   Tutun U ^b   Aksoyek A ^b   Apaydin, N ^c   Pamuk, K ^c   Can, Z ^c   Saritas Z ^c   Kucukay F ^b   Arda, K ^b   Katircioglu S F ^b  

^a Diskapi Children's Hospital   (Turkey)

^b TURKIYE YUKSEK IHTISAS HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^c ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Canine arteries; Polyurethane; Vascular prostheses, patency

Indexed keywords

POLYURETHAN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VESSEL GRAFT; BLOOD VESSEL OCCLUSION; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; CAROTID ARTERY; DOG; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; GRAFT OCCLUSION; GRAFT PATENCY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HYPERPLASIA; IMPLANTATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

ANIMALS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; CAROTID ARTERIES; DOGS; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; GRAFT SURVIVAL; MALE; POLYURETHANES; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 3242755997     PISSN: 0014312X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000078859     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Greenwald SE, Berry CL: Improving vascular grafts: The importance of mechanical and haemodynamic properties. J Pathol 2000;190:292-299.
2. Xue L, Greisler HP: Biomaterials in the development and future of vascular grafts. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:472-480.
3. Farrar DJ: Development of a prosthetic coronary artery bypass graft. Heart Surg Forum 2000;1:36-40.
4. Mattsson EJ, Kohler TR, Vergel SM, Clowes AW: Increased blood flow induces regression of intimal hyperplasia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:2245-2249.
5. Binns RL, Ku DN, Stewart MT, Ansley JP, Coyle KA: Optimal graft diameter: Effect of wall shear stress on vascular healing. J Vasc Surg 1989;10:326-327.
6. Salacinski HJ, Goldner S, Giudiceandrea A, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM, Edwards A, Carson RJ: The mechanical behavior of vascular grafts: A review. J Biomater Appl 2001;15:241-278.
7. Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Ascer E, et al: Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 1986;3:104-114.
8. Bebedetti-Valentini F, Gosseti B, Irace I, Martinelli O, Gattuso R: Composite grafts for critical ischemia. Cardiovasc Surg 1996;4:372-376.
9. Salacinski HJ, Seifalian AM, Hamilton G, Odlyha M: Thermo-mechanical analysis of a compliant poly(carbonate-urea) urethane after exposure to hydrolytic, oxidative, peroxidative and biological solutions. Biomaterials 2002;23:2231-2240.
10. Salacinski HJ, Tai NR, Carson RJ, Edwards A, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM: In vitro stability of a novel compliant poly(carbonate-urea)urethane to oxidative and hydrolytic stress. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59:207-218.
11. Hasegawa M, Azuma T: Mechanical properties of synthetic arterial grafts. J Biomech 1979;12:509-517.
12. Szycher M, Reed AM, Siciliano AA: In vivo testing of biostable polyurethane. J Biomater Appl 1991;6:110-130.
13. Capone CD: Biostability of non-ether polyurethane. J Biomater Appl 1992;7:108-129.
14. Hussain SM, Long GW, Juleff RS, McKain M, Glover JL, Bendick PJ, Townsend LE: Comparison of immediate seeding of endothelial cells with culture lining of small diameter ePTFE carotid interposition grafts. J Surg Res 1991;51:33-39.
15. Gore WL & Associates Inc: Gore-Tex™ Propaten Vascular Graft. Product brochure, March 2002.
16. www.carmeda.com/currentapplications; w.l. gore vascular grafts; Gore-Tex™ Propaten vascular graft; 2002 (download April 2003).
17. Hess F, Jerusalem C, Grande P, Braun B: Endothelialization of polyurethane vascular prostheses implanted in the dog carotid and femoral artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;29:458-463.
18. Dixit P, Hern-Anderson D, Ranieri J, Schmidt CE: Vascular graft endothelialization: Comparative analysis of canine and human endothelial cell migration on natural biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;56:545-555.
19. Tiwari A, Salacinski H, Seifalian AM, Hamilton G: New prostheses for use in bypass grafts with special emphasis on polyurethanes. Cardiovasc Surg 2002;10:191-197.
20. Tai NR, Salacinski HJ, Edwards A, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM: Compliance properties of conduits used in vascular reconstruction. Br J Surg 2000;87:1516-1524.
21. Davis MG, Hagen PO: Pathobiology of intimal hyperplasia. Br J Surg 1994;81:1254-1269.
22. Jeschke MG, Hermanutz V, Wolf SE, Koveker GB: Polyurethane vascular prostheses decreases neointimal formation compared with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:168-176.
23. Ulus AT, Tütün U, Zorlu F, Can C, Apaydin N, Karacagil S, Katircioǧlu SF, Bayazit M: Prevention of intimal hyperplasia by single-dose pre-insertion external radiation in canine-vein interposition grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000;19:456-460.
24. Ulus AT, Iscan Z, Saritas Z, Can C, Yamak B, Katircioǧlu SF, Bayazit M: Inhibition of myointimal proliferation by octretide in canine vein interposition grafts. Eur Surg Res 1998;30:318-325.
25. De Cossart L, How TV, Annis D: A two year study of the performance of a small diameter polyurethane (Biomer) arterial prosthesis. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1989;30:388-394.
26. Miyamoto K, Sugimoto T, Okada M, Maeda S: Experimental studies on application of small caliber vascular prosthesis produced by polyurethane. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;5:174-181.
27. Nakagawa Y, Ota K, Sato Y, Teraoka S, Agishi T: Clinical trial of new polyurethane vascular grafts for hemodialysis: Compared with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Artif Organs 1995;12:1227-1232.
28. Zdrahala RJ: Small caliber vascular grafts. Part II: Polyurethanes revisited. J Biomater Appl 1996;11:37-61.
29. Zdrahala RJ: Small caliber vascular grafts. Part I: State of the art. J Biomater Appl 1996;10:309-329.
30. He H, Shirota T, Yasui H, Matsuda T: Canine endothelial progenitor cell-lined hybrid vascular graft with nonthrombogenic potential. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:455-464.
31. Takahashi Y, Tabata Y: Homogeneous seeding of mesenchymal stem cells into nonwoven fabric for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2003;5:931-938.
32. Zhang Z, Wang Z, Liu S, Kodama M: Pore size, tissue in growth and endothelialization of small diameter microporous polyurethane vascular prostheses. Biomaterials 2004;25:177-187.
33. Aldenhoff YB, Van der Veen FH, Ter Woorst J, Habets J, Poole-Waren LA, Koole LH: Performance of a polyurethane vascular prosthesis carrying a dipyridamole (persantin) coating on its lumenal surface. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;54:224-233.
34. Fields C, Cassano A, Allen C, Meyer A, Pawlowski KJ, Bowlin GL, Rittgers SE, Szycher M: Endothelial cell seeding of a 4 mm ID polyurethane vascular graft. J Biomater Appl 2002;17:45-70.
35. Hess F, Jerusalem C, Braun B, Grande P: Evaluation of the patency rate of fibrous microvascular polyurethane prostheses after implantation in the rat aorta. Microsurgery 1983;4:176-181.
36. Hess F, Jerusalem C, Braun B, Grande P: Patency and neointima development in 10 cm long microvascular polyurethane prostheses implanted in the rat aorta. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984;32:283-287.
37. Nakagawa Y, Ota K, Sato Y, Fuchinoue S, Teraoka S, Agishi T: Complications in blood access for hemodialysis. Artif Organs 1994;4:283-288.
38. Kiyama H, Imazeki T, Kurihara S, Yoneshima H: Long-term follow-up of polyurethane vascular grafts for hemoaccess bridge fistulas. Ann Vasc Surg 2003;17:516-521.