On the Flexibility of Grammatical Advance Planning During Sentence Production: Effects of Cognitive Load on Multiple Lexical Access

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 423-440

  Wagner, Valentin ^a   Jescheniak, Jörg D ^a   Schriefers, Herbert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

grammatical encoding; lemma retrieval; lexical access; picture word interference; sentence production

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SPEECH ANALYSIS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ATTENTION; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VOCABULARY;

EID: 77649196712     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0018619     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Allum P.H., and Wheeldon L.R. Planning scope in spoken sentence production: The role of grammatical units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33 (2007) 791-810
2. Allum P.H., and Wheeldon L.R. Scope of lexical access in spoken sentence production: Implications for the conceptual-syntactic interface. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35 (2009) 1240-1255
3. Belke E. Effects of working memory load on lexical-semantic encoding in language production. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15 (2008) 357-363
4. Bock J.K., and Levelt W.J.M. Language production: Grammatical encoding. In: Gernsbacher M.A. (Ed). Handbook of psycholinguistics (1994), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 945-984
5. Boomer D.S. Hesitation and grammatical encoding. Language and Speech 8 (1965) 148-158
6. Brown-Schmidt S., and Tanenhaus M.K. Watching the eyes when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (2006) 592-609
7. Butterworth B. Evidence from pauses in speech. In: Butterworth B. (Ed). Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk (1980), Academic Press, London, England 155-176
8. Chang F., Dell G.S., and Bock K. Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review 113 (2006) 234-272
9. Clark H.H. Language as fixed-effect fallacy: Critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12 (1973) 335-359
10. Costa A., and Caramazza A. The production of noun phrases in English and Spanish: Implications for the scope of phonological encoding in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language 46 (2002) 178-198
11. Damian M.F., and Bowers J.S. Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10 (2003) 111-117
12. Damian M.F., and Dumay N. Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production. Journal of Memory and Language 57 (2007) 195-209
13. de Fockert J.W., Rees G., Frith C.D., and Lavie N. The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science 291 (2001, March 2) 1803-1806
14. Dell G.S., and O'Seadhgha P.G. Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition 42 (1992) 287-314
15. de Smedt K. Incremental sentence generation: A computer model of grammatical encoding [NICI Technical Report No. 90-01]. (Doctoral thesis, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands) (1990). http://ling.uib.no/desmedt/papers/dissertation.pdf Retrieved from http://ling.uib.no/desmedt/papers/dissertation.pdf
16. de Smedt K. Computational models of incremental grammatical encoding. In: Dijkstra T., and de Smedt K. (Eds). Computational psycholinguistics: AI and connectionist models of human language processing: Symbolic and subsymbolic models of language processing (1996), Taylor & Francis, London, England 279-307
17. Ferreira F. Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. Journal of Memory and Language 30 (1991) 210-233
18. Ferreira F., and Swets B. How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language 46 (2002) 57-84
19. Ferreira V.S., and Pashler H. Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (2002) 1187-1199
20. Finkbeiner M., and Caramazza A. Now you see it, now you don't: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task. Cortex 42 (2006) 790-796
21. Ford M. Sentence planning units: Implications for the speaker's representation of meaningful underlying sentences. In: Bresnan J. (Ed). The mental representation of grammatical relations (1982), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 797-851
22. Ford M., and Holmes V.M. Planning units and syntax in sentence production. Cognition 6 (1978) 35-53
23. Garrett M.F. The analysis of sentence production. In: Bower G.H. (Ed). The psychology of learning and motivation 9 (1975), Academic Press, New York, NY 133-177
24. Garrett M.F. Syntactic processes in sentence production. In: Wales R.J., and Walker E.C.T. (Eds). New approaches to language mechanisms (1976), North-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 231-256
25. Garrett M.F. Levels of processing in sentence production. In: Butterworth B. (Ed). Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk (1980), Academic Press, London, England 177-220
26. Goldman-Eisler F. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech (1968), Academic Press, London, England
27. Griffin Z.M., and Bock K. What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 274-279
28. Hartsuiker R.J., and Barkhuysen P.N. Language production and working memory: The case of subject-verb agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes 21 (2006) 181-204
29. Jefferies E., Ralph M.A.L., and Baddeley A.D. Automatic and controlled processing in sentence recall: The role of long-term and working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 51 (2004) 623-643
30. Jescheniak J.D., Schriefers H., and Hantsch A. Utterance format affects phonological priming in the picture-word task: Implications for models of phonological encoding in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 441-454
31. Jou J., and Harris R.J. The effect of divided attention on speech production. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (1992) 301-304
32. Kempen G., and Huijbers P. The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: Indirect election of words. Cognition 14 (1983) 185-209
33. La Heij W., Kuipers J.R., and Starreveld P.A. In defense of the lexical-competition account of picture-word interference: A comment on Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006). Cortex 42 (2006) 1028-1031
34. Lavie N., Hirst A., de Fockert J.W., and Viding E. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 (2004) 339-354
35. Levelt W.J.M. Speaking: From intention to articulation. 4th ed. (1989), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
36. Levelt W.J.M. Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98 (2001) 13464-13471
37. Levelt W.J.M., and Maassen B. Lexical search and order of mention in sentence production. In: Klein W., and Levelt W.J.M. (Eds). Crossing the boundaries in linguistics (1981), Reidel, Dordrecht, the Netherlands 221-252
38. Levelt W.J.M., and Meyer A.S. Word for word: Multiple lexical access in speech production. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 12 (2000) 433-452
39. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., and Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1999) 1-75
40. Lindsley J.R. Producing simple utterances: How far ahead do we plan. Cognitive Psychology 7 (1975) 1-19
41. Lindsley J.R. Producing simple utterances: Details of the planning process. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5 (1976) 331-354
42. Mahon B.Z., Costa A., Peterson R., Vargas K.A., and Caramazza A. Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33 (2007) 503-535
43. Martin R.C., Miller M., and Vu H. Lexical-semantic retention and speech production: Further evidence from normal and brain-damaged participants for a phrasal scope of planning. Cognitive Neuropsychology 21 (2004) 625-644
44. Meyer A.S. Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language 35 (1996) 477-496
45. Meyer A.S. Conceptual influences on grammatical planning units. Language and Cognitive Processes 12 (1997) 859-863
46. Mortensen L., Meyer A.S., and Humphreys G.W. Speech planning during multiple-object naming: Effects of ageing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (2008) 1217-1238
47. Oomen C.C.E., and Postma A. Effects of divided attention on the production of filled pauses and repetitions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44 (2001) 997-1004
48. Oppermann F., Jescheniak J.D., and Schriefers H. Phonological advance planning in sentence production. International Journal of Psychology 43 (2008) 469
49. Park S., Kim M.S., and Chun M.M. Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: Evidence for specialized load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33 (2007) 1062-1075
50. Pashler H., and Johnston J.C. Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In: Pashler H. (Ed). Attention (1998), Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, PA 155-189
51. Power M.J. Sentence production and working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 37 A (1985) 367-385
52. Roelofs A. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition 42 (1992) 107-142
53. Roelofs A. A case for nondecomposition in conceptually driven word retrieval. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 26 (1997) 33-67
54. Schnur T.T., Costa A., and Caramazza A. Planning at the phonological level during sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35 (2006) 189-213
55. Schriefers H. Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19 (1993) 841-850
56. Schriefers H., Meyer A.S., and Levelt W.J.M. Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language 29 (1990) 86-102
57. Schriefers H., Teruel E., and Meinshausen R.M. Producing simple sentences: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language 39 (1998) 609-632
58. Smith M., and Wheeldon L.R. High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition 73 (1999) 205-246
59. Smith M., and Wheeldon L.R. Horizontal information flow in spoken sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30 (2004) 675-686
60. Starreveld P.A., and La Heij W. Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995) 686-698
61. Starreveld P.A., and La Heij W. Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 (1996) 896-918
62. Stins J.F., Vosse S., Boomsma D.I., and de Geus E.J.C. On the role of working memory in response interference. Perceptual and Motor Skills 99 (2004) 947-958
63. von Kleist H. Über die allmähliche Verfertigung der Gedanken beim Reden [On the gradual production of thoughts whilst speaking]. In: Barth I.-M., Müller-Salget K., and Seeba H.C. (Eds). Heinrich von Kleist: Sämtliche Werke & Briefe 3 (1990), Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, Germany 535-540 (Original work published 1878)
64. Wheeldon L.R., and Lahiri A. The minimal unit of phonological encoding: Prosodic or lexical word. Cognition 85 (2002) B31-B41