The impact of model assumptions on results of computational mechanics in abdominal aortic aneurysm

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 679-688

  Reeps, Christian ^a   Gee, Michael ^b   Maier, Andreas ^b   Gurdan, Manuela ^a   Eckstein, Hans Henning ^a   Wall, Wolfgang A ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; AGED; ARTERY CALCIFICATION; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SIMULATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; THROMBUS;

AGED; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; AORTOGRAPHY; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77449161279     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.048     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Brewster J.H., Cronenwett J.L., Johnston K., Krupski W., and Matsumura J. Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 37 (2003) 1106-1117
2. Darling R., Messina C., and Ottinger D. Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The case for early resection. Circulation 56 (1977) 161-164
3. Nicholls S., Gardner J., Meissner M., and Johansen H. Rupture in small abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 28 (1998) 884-888
4. Ashton H., Buxton M., Day N., Kim L., Marteau T., and Scott R. The multicentre aneurysm screening study (mass) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 360 (2002) 1531-1539
5. Humphrey J., and Taylor C. Intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms: Similarities, differences, and need for a new class of computational models. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 10 (2008) 221-246
6. Vorp D. Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech 40 (2007) 1887-1902
7. Lasheras J. The biomechanics of arterial aneurysms. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 39 (2007) 293-319
8. Fillinger M., Raghavan M., Marra S., Croonenwett J., and Kennedy F. In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. J Vasc Surg 36 (2002) 589-597
9. Fillinger M., Marra S., Raghavan M., and Kennedy F. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. J Vasc Surg 37 (2003) 724-732
10. Raghavan M., Fillinger M., Marra S., Naegelein B., and Kennedy F. Automated methodology for determination of stress distribution in human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech Eng 127 (2005) 868-871
11. Doyle B., Callanan A., and McGloughlin T. A comparison of modelling techniques for computing wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms. BioMed Eng Online 6 (2007) 38
12. Vorp D., Raghavan M., and Webster M. Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of diameter and asymmetry. J Vasc Surg 27 (1998) 632-639
13. Maier A, Gee MW, Reeps C, Eckstein HH, Wall WA. Explicit treatment of calcifications in patient specific stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech [in press].
14. Speelman L., Bohra A., Bosboom E., Schurink G., van de Vosse F., Makaroun M., et al. Effects of calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech Eng 129 (2007) 105-109
15. Holzapfel G.A. Nonlinear solid mechanics (2000), Wiley Press, New York
16. Raghavan M., and Vorp D. Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. J Biomech 33 (2000) 475-482
17. Raghavan M., Webster M.W., and Vorp D. Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: assessment using a new mathematical model. Ann Biomed Eng 24 (1996) 573-582
18. Wang D.H.J., Makaroun M.S., Webster M.W., and Vorp D.A. Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 36 (2002) 598-604
19. Vande Geest J.P., Sacks M.S., and Vorp D.A. A planar biaxial constitutive relation for the luminal layer of intra-luminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech 39 (2006) 2347-2354
20. Hughes T.J.R. The finite element method: linear static and dynamic finite analysis (1987), Prentice Hall, New York
21. Crisfield M. Non-linear finite element analysis of solids and structures (1997), John Wiley & Sons, New York
22. Martino E.D., Guadagni G., Fumero A., Ballerini G., Spirito R., Biglioli P., et al. Fluid-structure interaction within realistic 3D models of the aneurysmatic aorta as a guidance to assess the risk of rupture of the aneurysm. Med Eng Phys 23 (2001) 647-655
23. Gee M., Reeps C., Eckstein H., and Wall W. Prestressing in finite deformation abdominal aortic aneurysm simulation. J Biomech 42 (2009) 1732-1739
24. Gee M, Förster C, Wall W. A computational strategy for prestressing patient-specific biomechanical problems under finite deformation. Comm Numeric Methods Eng Biomed Appl [published online DOI 10.1002/cnn.1236].
25. Fachinotti V., Cardona A., and Jetteur P. Finite element modelling of inverse design problems in large deformation anisotropic hyperelasticity. Int J Numeric Methods Eng 74 (2008) 894-910
26. Lu J., Zhou X., and Raghavan M. Inverse elastostatic stress analysis in pre-deformed biological structures: demonstration using abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech 40 (2007) 693-696
27. Lu J., Zhou X., and Raghavan M. Inverse method of stress analysis for cerebral aneurysms. J Biomech Model Mechanobiol 7 (2008) 477-486
28. Leung H.L., Wright A.R., Cheshire N., Crane J., Thom S.A., Hughes A.D., et al. Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with solid stress models. BioMedical Engineering Online 5 33 (2006) 1-15
29. Morris L., O'Donnell P., Delassus P., and McGloughlin T. Experimental assessment of stress patterns in abdominal aortic aneurysms using the photoelastic method. Strain 40 (2004) 165-172
30. Callanan A, Morris L, McGloughlin T. Numerical and experimental analysis of an idealised abdominal aortic aneurysm. Presented at: European Society of Biomechanics S-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands; 2004.
31. Heng M.S., Fagan M.J., Collier J.W., Desai G., McCollum P.T., and Chetter I.C. Peak wall stress measurement in elective and acute abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 47 (2008) 17-22
32. Choke E., Cockerill G., Wilson W.R., Sayed S., Dawson J., Loftus I., et al. A review of biological factors implicated in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 30 (2005) 227-244
33. Figueroa C, Baek S, Taylor C, Humphrey J. A computational framework for coupled fluid-solid growth in cardiovascular simulations. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng [in press].
34. Volokh K., and Vorp D. A model of growth and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech 41 (2008) 1015-1021
35. Geest J.V., Sacks M., and Vorp D. The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. J Biomech 39 (2006) 1324-1334
36. Figueroa C., Vignon-Clementel I., Jansen K., Hughes T., and Taylor C. A coupled momentum method for modelling blood flow in three-dimensional deformable arteries. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 195 (2006) 5685-5706
37. Rissland P., Alemu Y., Einav S., Ricotta J., and Bluestein D. Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model. J Biomech Eng 131 (2009) 031001