Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurisms: A comparison with solid stress models

BioMedical Engineering Online

Volumn 5, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Leung, James H ^a   Wright, Andrew R ^b   Cheshire, Nick ^b   Crane, Jeremy ^b   Thom, Simon A ^c   Hughes, Alun D ^c   Xu, Yun ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c NATIONAL HEART AND LUNG INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM (AAA); DILATATION; WALL STRESS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRESS ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; WALL FLOW;

FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AGED; ANEURYSM RUPTURE; AORTA WALL; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FLUID FLOW; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHEAR STRESS; ABDOMINAL AORTA; AORTA RUPTURE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL; VERY ELDERLY;

ADINA;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTA, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33745862995     PISSN: 1475925X     EISSN: 1475925X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-5-33     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Sayers RD: Aortic aneurysms, inflammatory pathways and nitric oxide. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2002, 84(4):239-246.
2. Zarins CK, White RA, Hodgson KJ, Schwarten D, Fogarty TJ: Endoleak as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx multicenter clinical trial. J Vasc Surg 2000, 32(1):90-107.
3. Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, Reinke DB, Littooy FN, Acher CW, Ballard DJ, Messina LM, Gordon IL, Chute EP, Krupski WC, Busuttil SJ, Barone GW, Sparks S, Graham LM, Rapp JH, Makaroun MS, Moneta GL, Cambria RA, Makhoul RG, Eton D, Ansel HJ, Freischlag JA, Bandyk D: Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2002, 346(19):1437-1444.
4. The Uk Small Aneurysm Trial P: Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. The Lancet 1998, 352(9141):1649-1655.
5. Brewster DC, Cronenwett JL, Hallett JWJ, Johnston KW, Krupski WC, Matsumura JS: Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 2003, 37(5):1106-1117.
6. Conway KP, Byrne J, Townsend M, Lane IF: Prognosis of patients turned down for conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the endovascular and sonographic era: Szilagyi revisited? J Vasc Surg 2001, 33(4):752-757.
7. Vorp DA, Geest JPV: Biomechanical Determinants of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005, 25(8):1558-1566.
8. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, Kim LG, Marteau TM, Scott RA, Thompson SG, Walker NM: The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002, 360(9345):1531-1539.
9. Fillinger MF, Marra SP, Raghavan ML, Kennedy FE: Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. J Vasc Surg 2003, 37(4):724-732.
10. Venkatasubramaniam AK, Fagan MJ, Mehta T, Mylankal KJ, Ray B, Kuhan G, Chetter IC, McCollum PT: A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004, 28(2):168-176.
11. Vorp DA, Raghavan ML, Webster MW: Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of diameter and asymmetry. J Vasc Surg 1998, 27(4):632-639.
12. Wang DH, Makaroun MS, Webster MW, Vorp DA: Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2002, 36(3):598-604.
13. Di Martino ES, Vorp DA: Effect of variation in intraluminal thrombus constitutive properties on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. Ann Biomed Eng 2003, 31(7):804-809.
14. Peattie RA, Riehle TJ, Bluth EI: Pulsatile flow in fusiform models of abdoiminal aortic aneurysms: flow fields, velocity patterns and flow-induced wall stresses. J Biomech Eng 2004, 126(4):438-446.
15. Di Martino ES, Guadagni G, Fumero A, Ballerini G, Spirito R, Biglioli P, Redaelli A: Fluid-structure interaction within realistic three-dimensional models of the aneurysmatic aorta as a guidance to assess the risk of rupture of the aneurysm. Med Eng Phys 2001, 23(9):647-655.
16. Li Z, Kleinstreuer C: Blood flow and structure interactions in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm model. Med Eng Phys 2005, 27(5):369-382.
17. Li Z, Kleinstreuer C: Effects of major endoleaks on a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech Eng 2006, 128(1):59-68.
18. Li Z, Kleinstreuer C: Fluid-structure interaction effects on sac-blood pressure and wall stress in a stented aneurysm. J Biomech Eng 2005, 127(4):662-671.
19. Taylor TW, Yamaguchi T: Three-dimensional simulation of blood flow in an abdominal aortic aneurysm - steady and unsteady flow cases. J Biomech Eng 1994, 116(1):89-97.
20. Finol EA, Hajiloo S, Keyhani K, Vorp DA, Amon CH: Flow-Induced Wall Pressure under Average Resting Hemodynamic Conditions for Patient-Specific Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. In ASME-PUBLICATIONS-BED Volume 54. ASME BED; 2002:363-364.
21. Finol EA, Di Martino ES, Vorp DA, Amon CH: Fluid-structure interaction and structural analyses of an aneurysm model. In Proceedings of the 2003 Summer Bioengineering Conference, 25-29 June 2003; Key Biscane, Florida American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2003:75-76.
22. Scotti CM, Shkolnik AD, Muluk SC, Finol EA: Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Effects of Asymmetry and Wall Thickness. Biomed Eng Online 2005, 4(1):64.
23. Papaharilaou Y, Ekaterinaris JA, Manousaki E, Katsamouris AN: A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech 2006.
24. Wolters BJBM, Rutten MCM, Schurink GWH, Kose U, de Hart J, van de Vosse FN: A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Medical Engineering & Physics 2005, 27(10):871-883.
25. Harter LP, Gross BH, Callen PW, Barth RA: Ultrasonic evaluation of abdominal aortic thrombus. J Ultrasound Med 1982, 1(8):315-318.
26. Bluestein D, Niu L, Schoephoerster RT, Dewanjee MK: Steady flow in an aneurysm model: correlation between fluid dynamics and blood platelet deposition. J Biomech Eng 1996, 118(3):280-286.
27. Vorp DA, Lee PC, Wang DH, Makaroun MS, Nemoto EM, Ogawa S, Webster MW: Association of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm with local hypoxia and wall weakening. J Vasc Surg 2001, 34(2):291-299.
28. Kazi M, Thyberg J, Religa P, Roy J, Eriksson P, Hedin U, Swedenborg J: Influence of intraluminal thrombus on structural and cellular composition of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall. J Vasc Surg 2003, 38(6):1283-1292.
29. Schurink G, van Baalen J, Visser M, van Bockel J: Thrombus within an aortic aneurysm does not reduce pressure on the aneurysmal wall. J Vasc Surg 2000, 31(3):.
30. Thubrikar MJ, Robicsek F, Labrosse M, Chervenkoff V, Fowler BL: Effect of thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall dilation and stress. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2003, 44(1):67-77.
31. Cheong PL: Magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics in the abdominal aortic bifurcation. In PhD Thesis Imperial College London, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemical Technology; 2004.
32. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE: Digital Image Processing. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inc.; 2002.
33. Moore JA, Steinman DA, Ross Ethier C: Computational blood flow modelling: Errors associated with reconstructing finite element models from magnetic resonance images. Journal of Biomechanics 1997, 31(2):179-184.
34. Olufsen MS, Peskin CS, Kim WY, Pedersen EM, Nadim A, Larsen J: Numerical Simulation and Experimental Validation of Blood Flow in Arteries with Structured-Tree Outflow Conditions. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2000, 28(11):1281-1299.
35. Li Z, Kleinstreuer C: Computational analysis of type II endoleaks in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm model. Journal of Biomechanics In Press, Corrected Proof:.
36. Marra SP, Raghavan ML, Whittaker DR, Fillinger MF, Chen DT, Dwyer JM, Tsapakos MJ, Kennedy FE: Estimation Of The Zero-Pressure Geometry Of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms From Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In Proceedings of the 2005 Summer Bioengineering Conference; 22 - 26 June 2005; Vail, Colorado American society of Mechanical Engineers; 2005.
37. Perktold K, Resch M, Florian H: Pulsatile non-Newtonian flow characteristics in a three-dimensional human carotid bifurcation model. J Biomech Eng 1991, 113(4):464-475.
38. Long Q, Xu XY, Bourne M, Griffith TM: Numerical study of blood flow in an anatomically realistic aorto-iliac bifurcation generated from MRI data. Magn Reson Med 2000, 43(4):565-576.
39. Moore JEJ, Ku DN: Pulsatile velocity measurements in a model of the human abdominal aorta under resting conditions. J Biomech Eng 1994, 116(3):337-346.
40. Taylor CA, Cheng CP, Espinosa LA, Tang BT, Parker D, Herfkens RJ: In vivo quantification of blood flow and wall shear stress in the human abdominal aorta during lower limb exercise. Ann Biomed Eng 2002, 30(3):402-408.
41. Egelhoff CJ, Budwig RS, Elger DF, Khraishi TA, Johansen KH: Model studies of the flow in abdominal aortic aneurysms during resting and exercise conditions. J Biomech 1999, 32(12):1319-1329.
42. Raghavan ML, Vorp DA: Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. J Biomech 2000, 33(4):475-482.
43. Adina R&D: ADINA Theory and Modeling Guide - Volume III: ADINA CFD & FSI. Watertown, MA., Adina R&D, Inc.; 2005.
44. Thubrikar MJ, Labrosse M, Robicsek F, Al-Soudi J, Fowler B: Mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall. J Med Eng Technol 2001, 25(4):133-142.
45. Thubrikar MJ, al-Soudi J, Robicsek F: Wall stress studies of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a clinical model. Ann Vasc Surg 2001, 15(3):355-366.
46. Elger DF, Blackketter DM, Budwig RS, Johansen KH: The influence of shape on the stresses in model abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech Eng 1996, 118(3):326-332.
47. Raghavan ML, Fillinger MF, Marra SP, Naegelein BP, Kennedy FE: Automated Methodology for Determination of Stress Distribution in Human Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. In Journal of Biomechanical Engineering Volume 127. Issue 5 ASME; 2005:868-871.
48. Fong B, Courtman DW, Lossing AG: Histological parameters of stability in abdominal aortic aneurysms. In Proceedings of the CSVS Annual Meeting 2005; 9-10 September 2005; Toronto, Ontario Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery; 2005.
49. Vande Geest JP, Sacks MS, Vorp DA: The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. J Biomech 2006, 39:1324-34.
50. Williamson SD, Lam Y, Younis HF, Huang H, Patel S, Kaazempur-Mofrad MR, Kamm RD: On the sensitivity of wall stresses in diseased arteries to variable material properties. J Biomech Eng 2003, 125(1):147-155.
51. Outten JT, Kruse KL, Freeman MB, Pcanowski JP, Ragsdale JW, Stevens SL, Goldman MH: Computational model of mechanical wall stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysm one hour prior to rupture. In Proceedings of the 2003 Summer Bioengineering Conference; 25-29 June 2003; Key Biscayne, Florida American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2003.
52. Sakalihasan N, Hustinx R, Limet R: Contribution of PET scanning to the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Seminars in Vascular Surgery 2004, 17(2):144-153.