Spatiotemporal interactions in retinal prosthesis subjects

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 1223-1233

  Horsager, Alan ^a,b   Greenberg, Robert J ^c   Fine, Ione ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Second Sight Medical Products Inc   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLINDNESS; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC FIELD; EYE SURGERY; HUMAN; MICROELECTRODE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE WAVE; RETINA PROSTHESIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL PROSTHESIS; VISUAL STIMULATION; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; RETINA; RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA; VISION;

BLINDNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; HUMANS; MALE; MICROELECTRODES; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RETINA; RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77449154178     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-3746     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Chader GJ. Animal models in research on retinal degenerations: past progress and future hope. Vis Res. 2002;42:393-399.
2. Marc RE, Jones BW. Retinal remodeling in inherited photoreceptor degenerations. Mol Neurobiol. 2003;28:139-147.
3. Jones BW, Watt CB, Marc RE. Retinal remodelling. Clin Exp Optom. 2005;88:282-291.
4. Santos A, Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, et al. Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa: a morphometric analysis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:511-515.
5. Humayun MS, Prince M, de Juan E Jr, et al. Morphometric analysis of the extramacular retina from postmortem eyes with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:143-148.
6. Mazzoni F, Novelli E, Strettoi E. Retinal ganglion cells survive and maintain normal dendritic morphology in a mouse model of inherited photoreceptor degeneration. J Neurosci. 2008;28:14282-14292.
7. Lagali PS, Balya D, Awatramani GB, et al. Light-activated channels targeted to ON bipolar cells restore visual function in retinal degeneration. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11:667-675.
8. Margolis DJ, Newkirk G, Euler T, Detwiler PB. Functional stability of retinal ganglion cells after degeneration-induced changes in synaptic input. J Neurosci. 2008;28:6526-6536.
9. Stasheff SF. Emergence of sustained spontaneous hyperactivity and temporary preservation of OFF responses in ganglion cells of the retinal degeneration (rd1) mouse. J Neurophysiol. 2008;99:1408-1421.
10. Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, Weiland JD, et al. Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina. Vis Res. 1999;39:2569-2576.
11. Rizzo JF III, Wyatt J, Loewenstein J, Kelly S, Shire D. Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:5362-5369.
12. Weiland JD, Yanai D, Mahadevappa M, et al. Visual task performance in blind humans with retinal prosthetic implants. Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Sci. 2004;6:4172-4173.
13. Yanai D, Weiland JD, Mahadevappa M, Greenberg RJ, Fine I, Humayun MS. Visual performance using a retinal prosthesis in three subjects with retinitis pigmentosa. J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:820-827.
14. Zrenner E. Subretinal implants for the restitution of vision in blind patients. Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Fort Lauderdale, FL. http://www.abstractsonline.com. Accessed November 12, 2009.
15. de Balthasar C, Patel S, Roy A, et al. Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in epiretinal prostheses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:2303-2314.
16. Horsager A, Greenwald SH, Weiland JD, et al. Predicting visual sensitivity in retinal prosthesis patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:1483-1491.
17. Boex C, de Balthasar C, Kos MI, Pelizzone M. Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;114:2049-2057.
18. Stickney GS, Loizou PC, Mishra LN, Assmann PF, Shannon RV, Opie JM. Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions. Hear Res. 2006;211:33-45.
19. de Balthasar C, Boex C, Cosendai G, Valentini G, Sigrist A, Pelizzone M. Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects. Hear Res. 2003;182:77-87.
20. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Zerbi M. Design and evaluation of a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing strategy for multichannel cochlear implants. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;30:110.
21. Donaldson GS, Kreft HA, Litvak L. Place-pitch discrimination of single-versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L). J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118:623-626.
22. McDermott HJ, McKay CM. Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;96:155-162.
23. Oyster CW. The Human Eye: Structure and Function. 1st ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.; 1999:766.
24. Hecht S, Verrijp CD. The influence of intensity, color and retinal location on the fusion frequency of intermittent illumination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1933;19:522-535.
25. Shady S, MacLeod DI, Fisher HS. Adaptation from invisible flicker. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:5170-5173.
26. Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Fujii GY, et al. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vis Res. 2003;43:2573-2581.
27. Mahadevappa M, Weiland JD, Yanai D, Fine I, Greenberg RJ, Humayun MS. Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005;13:201-206.
28. Wichmann FA, Hill NJ. The psychometric function, II: bootstrapbased confidence intervals and sampling. Percept Psychophys. 2001;63:1314-1329.
29. Green DG, Swets JA. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1988.
30. Fine I, Jacobs RA. Comparing perceptual learning across tasks: a review. J Vis. 2002;2:190-203.
31. Mao BQ, MacLeish PR, Victor JD. The intrinsic dynamics of retinal bipolar cells isolated from tiger salamander. Vis Neurosci. 1998;15:425-438.
32. Coleman PA, Miller RF. Measurement of passive membrane parameters with whole-cell recording from neurons in the intact amphibian retina. J Neurophysiol. 1989;61:218-230.
33. O'Brien BJ, Isayama T, Richardson R, Berson DM. Intrinsic physiological properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol. 2002;538:787-802.
34. Wiley JD, Webster JG. Distributed equivalent-circuit model for circular dispersive electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1982;29:385-389.
35. Cottaris NP, Elfar SD. How the retinal network reacts to epiretinal stimulation to form the prosthetic visual input to the cortex. J Neural Eng. 2005;2:S74-S90.
36. Jensen RJ, Rizzo JF 3rd. Responses of ganglion cells to repetitive electrical stimulation of the retina. J Neural Eng, 2007;4:S1-S6.
37. Amthor FR, Tootle JS, Grzywacz NM. Stimulus-dependent correlated firing in directionally selective retinal ganglion cells. Vis Neurosci. 2005;22:769-787.
38. Baccus SA. Timing and computation in inner retinal circuitry. Annu Rev Physiol. 2007;69:271-290.
39. Fried SI, Hsueh HA, Werblin FS. A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95:970-978.
40. Sekirnjak C, Hottowy P, Sher A, Dabrowski W, Litke AM, Chichilnisky EJ. High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design. J Neurosci. 2008;28:4446-4456.
41. Sekirnjak C, Hottowy P, Sher A, Dabrowski W, Litke AM, Chichilnisky EJ. Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95:3311-3327.
42. Ahuja AK, Behrend MR, Kuroda M, Humayun MS, Weiland JD. An in vitro model of a retinal prosthesis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55:1744-1753.
43. Milner PM. A model for visual shape recognition. Psychol Rev. 1974;81:521-535.
44. Reitboeck HJ. Fiber microelectrodes for electrophysiological recordings. J Neurosci Methods. 1983;8:249-262.
45. von der Malsburg C, Schneider W. A neural cocktail-party processor. Biol Cybern. 1986;54:29-40.
46. Gray CM, Konig P, Engel AK, Singer W. Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties. Nature. 1989;338:334-337.
47. Konig P, Engel AK, Singer W. Relation between oscillatory activity and long-range synchronization in cat visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:290-294.
48. Fries P, Roelfsema PR, Engel AK, Konig P, Singer W. Synchronization of oscillatory responses in visual cortex correlates with perception in interocular rivalry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:12699-12704.
49. Roelfsema PR, Engel AK, Konig P, Singer W. Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas. Nature. 1997;385:157-161.
50. Brosch M, Bauer R, Eckhorn R. Stimulus-dependent modulations of correlated high-frequency oscillations in cat visual cortex. Cereb Cortex. 1997;7:70-76.
51. Singer W. Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron. 1999;24:49-65, 111-125.
52. Mastronarde DN. Interactions between ganglion cells in cat retina. J Neurophysiol. 1983;49:350-365.
53. Mastronarde DN. Correlated firing of cat retinal ganglion cells, II: responses of X-and Y-cells to single quantal events. J Neurophysiol. 1983;49:325-349.
54. Mastronarde DN. Correlated firing of cat retinal ganglion cells, I: spontaneously active inputs to X-and Y-cells. J Neurophysiol. 1983;49:303-324.
55. Meister M, Lagnado L, Baylor DA. Concerted signaling by retinal ganglion cells. Science. 1995;270:1207-1210.
56. Kreiter AK, Singer W. Stimulus-dependent synchronization of neuronal responses in the visual cortex of the awake macaque monkey. J Neurosci. 1996;16:2381-2396.
57. Singer W, Kreiter AK, Engel AK, Fries P, Roelfsema PR, Volgushev M. Precise timing of neuronal discharges within and across cortical areas: implications for synaptic transmission. J Physiol Paris. 1996;90:221-222.
58. Fries P, Neuenschwander S, Engel AK, Goebel R, Singer W. Rapid feature selective neuronal synchronization through correlated latency shifting. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:194-200.
59. Fries P, Reynolds JH, Rorie AE, Desimone R. Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention. Science. 2001;291:1560-1563.
60. Gabriel A, Eckhorn R. A multi-channel correlation method detects traveling gamma-waves in monkey visual cortex. J Neurosci Methods. 2003;131:171-184.
61. Usher M, Donnelly N. Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception. Nature. 1998;394:179-182.
62. Lee SH, Blake R. Visual form created solely from temporal structure (see comment). Science. 1999;284:1165-1168.
63. Graham CH. Vision and Visual Perception. 1st ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1965:637.
64. Fahle M, Poggio T. Visual hyperacuity:spatiotemporal interpolation in human vision. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1981;213:451-477.
65. Heeger DJ. Model for the extraction of image flow. J Opt Soc Am A. 1987;4:1455-1471.
66. Grzywacz NM, Amthor FR, Mistler LA. Applicability of quadratic and threshold models to motion discrimination in the rabbit retina. Biol Cybern. 1990;64:41-49.
67. Grzywacz NM, Yuille AL. A model for the estimate of local image velocity by cells in the visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1990;239:129-161.
68. Nowlan SJ, Sejnowski TJ. A selection model for motion processing in area MT of primates. J Neurosci. 1995;15:1195-1214.
69. Simoncelli EP, Heeger DJ. A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT. Vis Res. 1998;38:743-761.
70. Bair W, Movshon JA. Adaptive temporal integration of motion in direction-selective neurons in macaque visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2004;24:7305-7323.