Use of 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluation of the abdomen

Radiographics

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1547-1563

  Erturk, Sukru Mehmet ^a   Alberich Bayarri, Angel ^b   Herrmann, Karin A ^c   Marti Bonmati, Luis ^b   Ros, Pablo R ^d  

^a SISLI ETFAL TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b HOSPITAL QUIRÓN   (Spain)

^c LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMEN; ARTICLE; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; VISCERA;

ABDOMEN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; VISCERA;

EID: 77449124461     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.296095516     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Merkle EM, Dale BM, Paulson EK. Abdominal MR imaging at 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006;14(1):17-26.
2. Barth MM, Smith MP, Pedrosa I, Lenkinski RE, Rofsky NM. Body MR imaging at 3.0 T: understanding the opportunities and challenges. RadioGraphics 2007;27(5):1445-1462; discussion 1462-1464.
3. Merkle EM, Dale BM. Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186 (6):1524-1532.
4. Katz-Brull R, Rofsky NM, Lenkinski RE. Breathhold abdominal and thoracic proton MR spectroscopy at 3 T. Magn Reson Med 2003;50(3):461-467.
5. Soher BJ, Dale BM, Merkle EM. A review of MR physics: 3 T versus 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007;15(3):277-290.
6. Bottomley PA, Foster TH, Argersinger RE, Pfeifer LM. A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. Med Phys 1984;11(4):425-448.
7. Akisik FM, Sandrasegaran K, Aisen AM, Lin C, Lall C. Abdominal MR imaging at 3.0 T. RadioGraphics 2007;27(5):1433-1444; discussion 1462-1464.
8. Chavhan GB, Babyn PS, Jankharia BG, Cheng HL, Shroff MM. Steady-state MR imaging sequences: physics, classification, and clinical applications. RadioGraphics 2008;28(4):1147-1160.
9. Boyle GE, Ahern M, Cooke J, Sheehy NP, Meaney JF. An interactive taxonomy of MR imaging sequences. RadioGraphics 2006;26(6):e24.
10. Keogan MT, Edelman RR. Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 2001;220(2): 310-320.
11. Martin DR, Danrad R, Herrmann K, Semelka RC, Hussain SM. Magnetic resonance imaging of the gastrointestinal tract. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2005;16(1):77-98.
12. Michaely HJ, Kramer H, Dietrich O, et al. Intraindividual comparison of high-spatial-resolution abdominal MR angiography at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: initial experience. Radiology 2007;244(3):907-913
13. Campeau NG, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein MA, Lin C, Gibbs GF. Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla: initial clinical experience. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12(3):183-204.
14. Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, Requardt M, Weinmann HJ. Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol 2005;40(11): 715-724.
15. Michaely HJ, Nael K, Schoenberg SO, et al. The feasibility of spatial high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the renal arteries at 3.0 T. Rofo 2005;177(6):800-804.
16. Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, Glickerman DJ, Pipavath S, Hoogeveen RM. Steady-state free precession MRA of the renal arteries: breath-hold and navigator-gated techniques vs. CE-MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26(4):966-973.
17. Szczepaniak LS, Nurenberg P, Leonard D, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure hepatic triglyceride content: prevalence of hepatic steatosis in the general population. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2005;288(2):E462-E468.
18. Cassidy FH, Yokoo T, Aganovic L, et al. Fatty liver disease: MR imaging techniques for the detection and quantification of liver steatosis. RadioGraphics 2009;29(1):231-260.
19. Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: optimizing b value for the detection and characterization of benign and malignant hepatic lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28(3):691-697.
20. Zech CJ, Herrmann KA, Dietrich O, Horger W, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO. Black-blood diffusion-weighted EPI acquisition of the liver with parallel imaging: comparison with a standard T2-weighted sequence for detection of focal liver lesions. Invest Radiol 2008;43(4):261-266.
21. Schindera ST, Miller CM, Ho LM, DeLong DM, Merkle EM. Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography: quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 Tesla with 1.5 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2007;42(6): 399-405.
22. Isoda H, Kataoka M, Maetani Y, et al. MRCP imaging at 3.0 T vs 1.5 T: preliminary experience in healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25 (5):1000-1006.
23. Choi JY, Kim MJ, Chung YE, et al. Abdominal applications of 3.0-T MR imaging: comparative review versus a 1.5-T system. RadioGraphics 2008;28 (4):e30.
24. Edelman RR, Salanitri G, Brand R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas at 3.0 tesla: qualitative and quantitative comparison with 1.5 tesla. Invest Radiol 2006;41(2):175-180.
25. Tsurusaki M, Semelka RC, Zapparoli M, et al. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0T and 1.5T MR imaging of the liver in patients with diffuse parenchymal liver disease. Eur J Radiol 2008 Sep 12. [Epub ahead of print]
26. Ramalho M, Altun E, Herédia V, Zapparoli M, Semelka R. Liver MR imaging: 1.5 T versus 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007;15(3):321-347.
27. Chang KJ, Kamel IR, Macura KJ, Bluemke DA. 3.0-T MR imaging of the abdomen: comparison with 1.5 T. RadioGraphics 2008;28(7):1983-1998.
28. Krautmacher C, Willinek WA, Tschampa HJ, et al. Brain tumors: full-and half-dose contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T-initial experience. Radiology 2005;237(3):1014-1019.
29. Hartmann D, Bassler B, Schilling D, et al. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 2006;238(1):143-149.
30. Saar B, Gschossmann JM, Bonel HM, Kickuth R, Vock P, Netzer P. Evaluation of magnetic resonance colonography at 3.0 Tesla regarding diagnostic accuracy and image quality. Invest Radiol 2008;43(8): 580-586.
31. Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 2004;232 (3):635-652.
32. Shellock FG. Radiofrequency energy-induced heating during MR procedures: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12(1):30-36.
33. Busse RF. Reduced RF power without blurring: correcting for modulation of refocusing flip angle in FSE sequences. Magn Reson Med 2004;51(5): 1031-1037.
34. Hennig J. Multiecho imaging sequences with low refocusing flip angles. J Magn Reson 1988;78(2): 397-407.
35. Hennig J, Scheffler K. Hyperechoes. Magn Reson Med 2001;46(1):6-12.
36. Pruessmann KP. Parallel imaging at high field strength: synergies and joint potential. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15(4):237-244.
37. Haacke E, Brown R, Thompson M, et al, eds. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss, 1999.
38. Serway R. Physics for scientists and engineers. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1992; 955-977.
39. Collins CM, Liu W, Schreiber W, Yang QX, Smith MB. Central brightening due to constructive interference with, without, and despite dielectric resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21(2):192-196.
40. Kangarlu A, Baertlein BA, Lee R, et al. Dielectric resonance phenomena in ultra high field MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23(6):821-831.
41. Thesen S, Krueger G, Mueller E. Compensation of dielectric resonance effects by means of composite excitation pulses [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2003.
42. Alsop DC, Connick TJ, Mizsei G. A spiral volume coil for improved RF field homogeneity at high static magnetic field. Magn Reson Med 1998;40(1): 49-54.
43. Tomanek B, Ryner L, Hoult DI, Kozlowski P, Saunders JK. Dual surface coil with high-B1 homogeneity for deep organ MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15(10):1199-1204.
44. Vaughan JT, Adriany G, Snyder CJ, et al. Efficient high-frequency body coil for high-field MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004;52(4):851-859.
45. Schmitt M, Feiweier T, Horger W, et al. Improved uniformity of RF-distribution in clinical whole body imaging at 3 T by means of dielectric pads [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2004.
46. Franklin KM, Dale BM, Merkle EM. Improvement in B1-inhomogeneity artifacts in the abdomen at 3 T MR imaging using a radiofrequency cushion. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27(6):1443-1447.
47. Elster AE, Burdette JH. Questions and answers in magnetic resonance imaging. 2nd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 2001; 6, 128.
48. Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Jain VR, Petersilge CA, Chao CP, Haaga JR. Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166(6):1337-1345.
49. Shellock FG. Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0- Tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16 (6):721-732.
50. Schaefer DJ, Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA. Review of patient safety in time-varying gradient fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12(1):20-29.
51. Shellock FG. Magnetic resonance procedures: health effects and safety. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC, 2001; 453.