A closer look at the local responses of twin and grain boundaries in Cu to stress at the nanoscale with possible transition from the P-H to the inverse P-H relation

Acta Materialia

Volumn 58, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 2677-2684

  Yue, L ^a   Zhang, H ^a   Li, D Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Inverse Petch Hall relation; Molecular dynamics; Nano grains; Nano twinning; Simulation

Indexed keywords

DISLOCATION MOVEMENT; DYNAMIC SYSTEMS; ELECTRICAL CONTACTS; HIGH-DENSITY; INTRINSIC CONDUCTIVITY; LOCAL RESPONSE; MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; NANO GRAINS; NANO SCALE; NANO-SIZED; NANOCRYSTALLINE COPPER; NANOGRAIN BOUNDARIES; NANOGRAINED MATERIALS; NANOTWINS; TWIN BOUNDARIES;

COPPER; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; ELECTRON ENERGY LOSS SPECTROSCOPY; GRAIN BOUNDARIES; GRAIN SIZE AND SHAPE; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; STRESSES; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

GRAIN BOUNDARY SLIDING;

EID: 77249088139     PISSN: 13596454     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.054     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Lu L., Shen Y.F., Chen X.H., Qian L.H., and Lu K. Science 304 (2004) 422
2. Ma E., Wang Y.M., Lu Q.H., Sui M.L., Lu L., and Lu K. Appl Phys Lett 85 (2004) 4932
3. Qian L.H., Lu Q.H., Kong W.J., and Lu K. Scripta Mater 50 (2004) 1407
4. Dao M., Lu L., Asaro R.J., De Hosson J.T.M., and Ma E. Acta Mater 55 (2007) 4041
5. Zhu T., Li J., Samanta A., Kim H.G., and Suresh S. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104 (2007) 3031
6. Schiotz J., and Jacobsen K.W. Science 301 (2003) 1357
7. Nam H.S., and Srolovitz D.J. Phys Rev Lett 99 (2007) 025501
8. Li D.Y., Chen Q., and Wang X.Y. J Appl Phys 99 (2006) 044305
9. Yamakov V., Wolf D., Phillpot S.R., and Gleiter H. Acta Mater 50 (2002) 5005
10. Cao A., Wei Y.G., and Ma E. Phys Rev B 77 (2008) 195429
11. Cao A.J., Wei Y.G., and Mao S.X. Appl Phys Lett 90 (2007) 151909
12. Li L., and Ghoniem N.M. Phys Rev B 79 (2009) 075444
13. Spearot D.E., Tschopp M.A., Jacob K.I., and McDowell D.L. Acta Mater 55 (2007) 705
14. Tschopp M.A., Tucker G.J., and McDowell D.L. Comput Mater Sci 44 (2008) 351
15. Shabib I., and Miller R.E. Model Simulat Mater Sci 17 (2009) 055009
16. Cao A.J., and Wei Y.G. J Appl Phys 102 (2007) 083511
17. Zhang H.Y., Hu Z.Q., and Lu K. J Appl Phys 77 (1995) 2811
18. Anderoglu O., Misra A., Wang H., Ronning F., Hundley M.F., and Zhang X. Appl Phys Lett 93 (2008) 083108
19. Yip S. Nature 391 (1998) 532
20. Schiotz J., Di Tolla F.D., and Jacobsen K.W. Nature 391 (1998) 561
21. Van Swygenhoven H., Spaczer M., Caro A., and Farkas D. Phys Rev B 60 (1999) 22
22. Schiotz J., Vegge T., Di Tolla F.D., and Jacobsen K.W. Phys Rev B 60 (1999) 11971
23. Yamakov V., Wolf D., Phillpot S.R., Mukherjee A.K., and Gleiter H. Nat Mater 1 (2002) 45
24. Mishin Y., Mehl M.J., Papaconstantopoulos D.A., Voter A.F., and Kress J.D. Phys Rev B 6322 (2001) 224106
25. Foiles S.M., Baskes M.I., and Daw M.S. Phys Rev B 33 (1986) 7983
26. Plimpton S. J Comput Phys 117 (1995) 1
27. Steinhardt P.J., Nelson D.R., and Ronchetti M. Phys Rev B 28 (1983) 784
28. Nose S. Mol Phys 52 (1984) 255
29. Hoover W.G. Phys Rev A 31 (1985) 1695
30. Schuh C.A., Nieh T.G., and Yamasaki T. Scripta Mater 46 (2002) 735
31. Hall E.O. Proc Phys Soc London B 64 (1951) 742