Analysis of perceptions of quality of wild and cultured seabream in Spain

Aquaculture Economics and Management

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 43-62

  Fernández Polanco, José ^a   Luna, Ladislao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTABRIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Attitudes towards aquaculture; Quality assessments; Safety perception

Indexed keywords

AQUACULTURE; ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; FOOD MARKET; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; PERCEPTION; SEAFOOD; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

SPAIN;

EID: 77249086565     PISSN: 13657305     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13657300903566878     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson, J.C. & Anderson, J.L. (1991) Seafood quality: Issues for consumer researchers. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 25(1), 144-163.
2. Anderson, J.L. & Bettencourt, S.U. (1991) A conjoint approach to model product preferences. The New England market for fresh and frozen salmon. Marine Resource Economics, 8, 31-49.
3. APROMAR. (2007) La acuicultura marina de peces en España. Available at: http://www.apromar.es/ Informes/Informe-APROMAR-2007.pdf
4. APROMAR. (2008) La acuicultura marina de peces en España. Available at: http://www.apromar.es/ Informes/Informe-APROMAR-2008.pdf
5. Arbuckle, J.L. (2006) Amos 7.0 User's Guide. SPSS, Chicago.
6. Asp, E.H. (1999) Factors affecting food decisions made by individual consumers. Food Policy, 24, 287-294.
7. Bagozzi, R.P. (1994) Structural equation models: Basic principles. In: Principles of Marketing Research (ed Bagozzi), Basil Blackwell Ltd. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
8. Bentler, P.M. & Bonett, D.G. (1980) Significant tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
9. Bertozzi, L. (1995) Designation of origin: Quality and specification. Food Quality and Preference, 6, 143-147.
10. Bollen, K.A. (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
11. Bollen, K.A. & Lennox, R. (1991) Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305-314.
12. Choo, H., Chung, J.-E., & Pysarchik, D.T. (2004) Antecedents to new food product purchasing behavior among innovator groups in India. European Journal of Marketing, 38(5/6), 608-625.
13. Davidson, A., Schröeder, M.J.A., & Bower, J.A. (2003) The importance of origin as a quality attribute for beef: Results from a Scottish consumer survey. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(2),91-98.
14. European Commission. (2002) A Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture. Communication form the Commission to the Council and European Parliament. COM, 2002, p. 511. Brussels.
15. European Commission DG Fisheries & University of Stirling. (2004). Study of the Market for Aquaculture Produced Seabass and Seabream Species. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/ fisheries/doc_et_publ/pub_en.htm
16. Eurostat. (2007) Eurostat pocketbooks. Fishery statistics, data 1990-2006. Eurostat. Luxembourg.Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-DW-07-001/EN/KS-DW-07-001-EN.PDF
17. FAO. (2007) Fishstat Plus database and datasets. Available at: http://www.fao.org/fishery/ topic/16073.
18. Fazio, R.H. (1986) How do attitudes guide behavior? In: Handbook of Motivation and Cognition (eds R.M. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgins), pp 204-243. Wiley, New York.
19. Fishbein, M.A. & Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
20. Fotopoulos, Ch. & Krystallis, A. (2003) Quality labels as a marketing advantage. The case of 'PDO Zagora' apples in the Greek market. European Journal of Marketing, 37(10), 1350-1374.
21. FROM. (2009) Investigación sobre el Complimiento del Etiquetado de Productos Pesqueros. FROM. Madrid. Available at: http://www.from.es/esp/estudios/det_estudio.asp?sec=Estudios%20y%20Proyestos% 20t%E9cnicos&sub=Estudios%20y%20Proyestos%20t%E9cnicos&menu=&estudio=120
22. Hoffman, R. (2000) Country of origin - A consumer perception perspective of fresh meat. British Food Journal, 102, 211-229.
23. Holland, D. & Wessells, C.R. (1998) Predicting consumer preferences for fresh salmon: the influence of safety inspection and productive method attributes. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 27, 1-14.
24. Jaffry, S., Pickering, H., Ghulam, Y., Whitmarsh, D., & Wattage, P. (2003) Consumer choices for quality and sustainability labelled seafood products in the UK. Food Policy, 29, 215-228.
25. Jöreskog, K.G. (1971) Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36(2), 109-133.
26. Kinnucan, H.W. & Venkateswaran, M. (1990) Effects of generic advertising on perceptions and behavior: The case of catfish. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 22, 137-151.
27. Kinnucan, H.W. & Wessells, C.R. (1997) Marketing research paradigms for aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics and Management, 1, 73-86.
28. Lawless, H. (1995) Dimensions of sensory quality: a critique. Food Quality & Preference, 6, 191-199.
29. Loureiro, M.L. & McCluskey, J.J. (2000) Assessing consumer response to protected geographical identification labeling. Agribusiness, 16(3), 309-320.
30. MAPA. (2007). La Alimentación en España, 2006. Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación. Madrid. Available at: http://www.mapa.es/es/alimentacion/pags/consumo/libro/2006/libro.htm
31. MAPA. (2008a) Valoración de la acuicultura en España. Informe 2007. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid.
32. MAPA. (2008b) Bases de datos del Panel de Consumo Alimentario. Available at: http://www.mapa.es/es/alimentacion/pags/consumo/BD/consulta.asp
33. MARM (2009) Valoración de la acuicultura en España. 2003-2007. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente Rural y Marino, Madrid.
34. Quagrainie, K., Hart, S., & Brown, P. (2008) Consumer acceptance of locally grown food: The case of Indiana aquaculture products. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 12(1), 54-70.
35. Rosenberg, M.J. & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Attitude Organization and Change. Ed. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
36. Sanzo, M.J., Rio, A.B., Iglesias, V. & Vázquez, R. (2003) Attitude and satisfaction in a traditional food product. British Food Journal, 105(11), 771-790.
37. Sapp, S.G. (2003) A comparison of alternative theoretical explanations of consumer food safety assessments. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(1), 34-39.
38. Wessells, C.R. & Anderson, J.G. (1995) Consumer willingness to pay for seafood safety assurances. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 29, 85-107.
39. Wessells, C.R., Johnston, R.J., & Donath, H. (1999) Assessing consumer preferences for ecolabeled seafood: The influence of species, certifier, and household attributes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(5), 1084-1089.
40. Yi, Y. (1989) An investigation of the structure of expectancy-value attitude and its implications.International Journal of Research in Marketing, 6, 71-83.
41. Young, J.A., Brugere, C., & Muir, J.F. (1999) Green grow the fishes-Oh? Environmental attributes in marketing aquaculture products. Aquaculture Economics and Management, 3(2), 7-17.
42. Young, J.A., Boyd K., Little, D.C., Murray, F., & Watterson, A. (2008) The emergent role of non- product attributes in marketing tilapia. World Aquaculture 2008, May 21, Busan, Korea.
43. Zeithaml, V.A. (1988) Consumer perception of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(Jul), 2-22.