Analyzing the use of a rubric-based grading tool

Proceedings of the Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education, ITiCSE

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 333-337

  Ahoniemi, Tuukka ^a   Karavirta, Ville ^b  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Assessment; Grading; Mass courses; Programming; Rubrics

Indexed keywords

HIGH QUALITY; MASS COURSE; PROGRAMMING COURSE; SEMI-AUTOMATIC ASSESSMENT;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; EDUCATION COMPUTING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; GRADING; INNOVATION;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

EID: 77049095830     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1562877.1562977     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. T. Ahoniemi, E. Lahtinen, and T. Reinikainen. Improving pedagogical feedback and objective grading. In SIGCSE '08: Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 72-76, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
2. T. Ahoniemi and T. Reinikainen. Aloha - a grading tool for semi-automatic assessment of mass programming courses. In Baltic Sea '06: Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea conference on Computing education research, pages 139-140. ACM, 2006.
3. K. Ala-Mutka and H.-M. Järvinen. Assessment process for programming assignments. Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on, pages 181-185, 30 Aug.-1 Sept. 2004.
4. L. Anglin, K. Anglin, P. L. Schumann, and J. A. Kaliski. Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of grading through the use of computer-assisted grading rubrics. Decision Sciences The Journal of Innovative Education, 6(1):51-73, January 2008.
5. T. Auvinen, V. Karavirta, and T. Ahoniemi. Rubyric: An online assessment tool for effortless authoring of personalized feedback. In ITiCSE '09: Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, Paris, France, 2009.
6. K. Becker. Grading programming assignments using rubrics. In ITiCSE '03: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, pages 253-253. ACM, 2003.
7. P. Black and D. Wiliam. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1):7-74, 1998.
8. F. J. R. C. Dochy and L. McDowell. Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 23(4):279-298, 1997.
9. C. Douce, D. Livingstone, and J. Orwell. Automatic test-based assessment of programming: A review. J. Educ. Resour. Comput., 5(3):4, 2005.
10. S. Habeshaw, G. Gibbs, and T. Habeshaw. 53 Problems With Large Classes. Technical and Educational Services Ltd., Bristol, U.K., 1992.
11. P. Sirkkala and S. Puonti. Nalkki-project - tool for plagiarism detection using the web. In R. Lister and Simon, editors, Seventh Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling 2007), volume 88 of CRPIT, pages 229-230, Koli National Park, Finland, 2007. ACS.
12. M. Yorke. Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4):477-501, 2003.