ALOHA - A grading tool for semi-automatic assessment of mass programming courses

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 276, Issue , 2006, Pages 139-140

  Ahoniemi, Tuukka ^a   Reinikainen, Tommi ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

K.3.2 Computers and Education : Computer and Information Science Education

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION; GRADING PROCESS; INFORMATION SCIENCE EDUCATION; K.3.2 [COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION]: COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCE EDUCATION; ONLINE GRADING; POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS; PROGRAMMING COURSE; SEMI-AUTOMATIC ASSESSMENT; STUDENT ASSIGNMENTS;

GRADING; INFORMATION SCIENCE;

TEACHING;

EID: 77953500578     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1315803.1315830     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. K. Ala-Mutka and H.-M. Järvinen. Assessment process for programming assignments. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'04), 2004.
2. K. M. Ala-Mutka. A survey of automated assessment approaches for programming assignments. Computer Science Education, 15(2):83-102, June 2005.
3. K. Becker. Grading programming assignments using rubrics. In ITiCSE '03: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, pages 253-253, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM Press.
4. M. Daniels, A. Berglund, A. Pears, and S. Fincher. Five myths of assessment. In ACE '04: Proceedings of the sixth conference on Australasian computing education, pages 57-61, Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 2004. Australian Computer Society, Inc.
5. S. Habeshaw, G. Gibbs, and T. Habeshaw. 53 Problems With Large Classes. Technical and Educational Services Ltd., Bristol, U.K., 1992.