Prediction of response to chemoradiation therapy in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 262-268

  Kim, Sungheon ^a,b   Loevner, L A ^a   Quon, H ^a   Kilger, A ^a   Sherman, E ^a   Weinstein, G ^a   Chalian, A ^a   Poptani, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CETUXIMAB; CISPLATIN; DOCETAXEL; FLUOROURACIL; GADODIAMIDE; PACLITAXEL;

ADJUVANT THERAPY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG MONITORING; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK CARCINOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LARYNX CARCINOMA; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MALE; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; TONGUE CARCINOMA; TONSIL CARCINOMA; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GADOLINIUM; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 76749085256     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1817     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Jain RK. Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science 2005;307:58-62
2. Batchelor TT, Sorensen AG, di Tomaso E, et al. AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients. Cancer Cell 2007;11:83-95
3. Ludwig JA, Weinstein JN. Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5:845-56
4. Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991;17:357-67
5. Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:91-101
6. Brix G, Semmler W, Port R, et al. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:621-28
7. Landis CS, Li X, Telang FW, et al. Equilibrium transcytolemmal water-exchange kinetics in skeletal muscle in vivo. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:467-78
8. Yankeelov TE, RooneyWD,Li X, et al. Variation of the relaxographic "shutter speed" for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus-tracking curve shape. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:1151-69
9. Cha S. Update on brain tumor imaging: from anatomy to physiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:475-87
10. O'Connor JP, Jackson A, Parker GJ, et al. DCE-MRI biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents. Br J Cancer 2007;96:189-95
11. Noworolski SM, Fischbein NJ, Kaplan MJ, et al. Challenges in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI imaging of cervical lymph nodes to detect metastatic disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:455-62
12. Hoskin PJ, Saunders MI, Goodchild K, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance scanning as a predictor of response to accelerated radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer. Br J Radiol 1999;72:1093-98
13. Rijpkema M, Kaanders JH, Joosten FB, et al. Method for quantitative mapping of dynamic MRI contrast agent uptake in human tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:457-63
14. Kim S, Quon H, Loevner LA, et al. Transcytolemmal water exchange in pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:1607-17
15. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts&Figures 2008. Available at: http://www. cancer.org/docroot/stt/content/stt-1x-cancer-facts-and-figures- 2008.asp. Accessed May 28, 2008
16. Zorat PL, Paccagnella A, Cavaniglia G, et al. Randomized phase III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancer: 10-year follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1714-17
17. Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. New Engl J Med 2006;354:567-78
18. Song HK, Dougherty L. Dynamic MRI with projection reconstruction and KWIC processing for simultaneous high spatial and temporal resolution. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:815-24
19. Kim S, Dougherty L, Rosen MA, et al. Automatic correction of in-plane bulk motion artifacts in self-navigated radial MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:367-78
20. Tofts PS, Berkowitz B, Schnall MD. Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:564-68
21. Li X, Rooney WD, Springer CS Jr.Aunified magnetic resonance imaging pharmacokinetic theory: intravascular and extracellular contrast reagents. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:1351-59
22. Yankeelov TE, Rooney WD, Huang W, et al. Evidence for shutter-speed variation in CR bolus-tracking studies of human pathology. NMR Biomed 2005;18:173-85
23. Cashen TA, Carr JC, Shin W, et al. Intracranial time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:822-29
24. Nelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 1965;7:308-13
25. Kamijo T, Yokose T, Hasebe T, et al. Potential role of microvessel density in predicting radiosensitivity of T1 and T2 stage laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:3159-65
26. Yamashita Y, Baba T, Baba Y, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhancedMRimaging of uterine cervical cancer: pharmacokinetic analysis with histopathologic correlation and its importance in predicting the outcome of radiation therapy. Radiology 2000;216:803-09
27. George ML, Dzik-Jurasz AS, Padhani AR, et al. Non-invasive methods of assessing angiogenesis and their value in predicting response to treatment in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2001;88:1628-36
28. Loncaster JA, Carrington BM, Sykes JR, et al. Prediction of radiotherapy outcome using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;54:759-67
29. van Laarhoven HW, Klomp DW, Rijpkema M, et al. Prediction of chemotherapeutic response of colorectal liver metastases with dynamic gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MRI and localized 19F MRS pharmacokinetic studies of 5-fluorouracil. NMR Biomed 2007;20:128-40
30. Cao Y, Popovtzer A, Li D, et al. Early prediction of outcome in advanced head and-neck cancer based on tumor blood volume alterations during therapy: a prospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;72:1287-90
31. Zima A, Carlos R, Gandhi D, et al. Can pretreatment CT perfusion predict response of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract treated with induction chemotherapy? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:328-34
32. Gandhi D, Chepeha DB, Miller T, et al. Correlation between initial and early follow-up CT perfusion parameters with endoscopic tumor response in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx treated with organ-preservation therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:101-06
33. Hermans R, Meijerink M, Van den Bogaert W, et al. Tumor perfusion rate determined noninvasively by dynamic computed tomography predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;57:1351-56
34. Evelhoch JL, He Z, Polin L, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI evaluation of the effects of ZD6126 on tumor vasculature. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Glasgow, Scotland, April 21-27, 2001;9:481
35. Zhao J, Salmon H, Sarntinoranont M. Effect of heterogeneous vasculature on interstitial transport within a solid tumor. Microvasc Res 2007;73:224 -36. Epub 2006 Dec 24
36. Pellerin M, Yankeelov TE, Lepage M. Incorporating contrast agent diffusion into the analysis of DCE-MRI data. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1124-34
37. Zhou R, Pickup S, Yankeelov TE, et al. Simultaneous measurement of arterial input function and tumor pharmacokinetics in mice by dynamic contrast enhanced imaging: effects of transcytolemmal water exchange. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:248-57