Learning canonical forms of entailment rules

International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP

Volumn 2007-January, Issue , 2007, Pages 558-563

  Szpektor, Idan ^a   Dagan, Ido ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Knowledge acquisition; Paraphrases; Textual entailment

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

CANONICAL FORM; MODULAR APPROACH; PARAPHRASE; REDUNDANT RULES; RULE LEARNING; TEXTUAL ENTAILMENT;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 84959065412     PISSN: 13138502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. R. Bar-Haim, I. Dagan, B. Dolan, L. Ferro, D. Giampiccolo, B. Magnini, and I. Szpektor. The second pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. In Second PASCAL Challenge Workshop for Recognizing Textual Entailment, 2006.
2. R. Barzilay and L. Lee. Learning to paraphrase: An unsupervised approach using multiple-sequence alignment. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, 2003.
3. R. Bunescu, R. Ge, K. J. Rohit, E. M. Marcotte, R. J. Mooney, A. K. Ramani, and Y. W. Wong. Comparative experiments on learning information extractors for proteins and their interactions. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Special Issue on Summarization and Information Extraction from Medical Documents), 2004.
4. J. Cohen. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20:37-46, 1960.
5. I. Dagan, O. Glickman, and B. Magnini. The pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3944:177-190, 2006.
6. C. Fellbaum, editor. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Language, Speech and Communication. MIT Press, 1998.
7. O. Gurevich, R. S. Crouch, T. H. King, and V. de Paiva. Deverbal nouns in knowledge representation. In Proceedings of FLAIRS, 2006.
8. S. Harabagiu and A. Hickl. Methods for using textual entailment in opendomain question answering. In Proceedings of ACL, 2006.
9. D. Lin. Dependency-based evaluation of minipar. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluation of Parsing Systems at LREC, 1998.
10. D. Lin and P. Pantel. Discovery of inference rules for question answering. Natural Language Engineering, 7(4):343-360, 2001.
11. C. Macleod, R. Grishman, A. Meyers, L. Barrett, and R. Reeves. Nomlex: A lexicon of nominalizations. Proceedings of EURALEX, 1998.
12. C. Quirk, C. Brockett, and W. Dolan. Monolingual machine translation for paraphrase generation. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2004.
13. D. Ravichandran and E. Hovy. Learning surface text patterns for a question answering system. In Proceedings of ACL, 2002.
14. L. Romano, M. Kouylekov, I. Szpektor, I. Dagan, and A. Lavelli. Investigating a generic paraphrase-based approach for relation extraction. In Proceedings of EACL, 2006.
15. T. Ron. Generating entailment rules using online lexical resources. Masters' thesis, Computer Science Department, Bar Ilan University, 2006.
16. S. Sekine. Automatic paraphrase discovery based on context and keywords between ne pairs. In Proceedings of IWP, 2005.
17. S. Sekine. On-demand information extraction. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL Main Conference Poster Sessions, 2006.
18. Y. Shinyama, S. Sekine, K. Sudo, and R. Grishman. Automatic paraphrase acquisition from news articles. In Proceedings of HLT, 2002.
19. I. Szpektor, E. Shnarch, and I. Dagan. Instance-based evaluation of entailment rule acquisition. In Proceedings of ACL, 2007.
20. I. Szpektor, H. Tanev, I. Dagan, and B. Coppola. Scaling web-based acquisition of entailment relations. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2004.