Prediction of vascular involvement and resectability by multidetector-row CT versus MR imaging with MR angiography in patients who underwent surgery for resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 310-316

  Lee, Jeong Kyong ^b   Kim, Ah Young ^a   Kim, Pyo Nyun ^a   Lee, Moon Gyu ^a   Ha, Hyun Kwon ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Ewha Womans University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Helical computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoplasm; Pancreas

Indexed keywords

DETECTABILITY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMAS; HELICAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIES; HELICAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MR ANGIOGRAPHY; MR IMAGING; MULTIDETECTOR-ROW CT; PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMA; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES;

ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TUMORS;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, PANCREATIC DUCTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR NEOPLASMS;

EID: 76349099806     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.028     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ries L, Harkins D, Krapcho M, et al., editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003 [based on the November 2005 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site 2006]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975-2003/; 2006 [accessed September 24, 2007].
2. Cameron J.L., Riall T.S., Coleman J., and Belcher K.A. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 244 1 (2006) 10-15
3. Hanninen E., Amthauer H., Hosten N., et al. Prospective evaluation of pancreatic tumors: accuracy of MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR angiography. Radiology 224 (2002) 34-41
4. Schima W., Fugger R., Schober E., et al. Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: comparison of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging and contrast-enhanced helical hydro-CT. Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 717-724
5. Ichikawa T., Haradome H., Hachiya J., et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: preoperative assessment with helical CT versus dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 202 (1997) 655-722
6. Hommeyer S., Freeny P., and Crabo L. Carcinoma of the head of the pancreas: evaluation of the pancreaticoduodenal veins with dynamic CT-potential for improved accuracy in staging. Radiology 196 (1995) 233-238
7. Megibow A. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: designing the examination to evaluate the clinical questions. Radiology 183 (1992) 297-303
8. O'Malley M., Boland G., Wood B., Castillo C., Warshaw A., and Mueller P. Adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: determination of surgical unresectability with thin-section pancreatic-phase helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 173 (1999) 1513-1518
9. Megibow A., Zhou X., Rotterdam H., et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of respectability-report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Study Group. Radiology 195 (1995) 327-332
10. Nishiharu T., Yamashita Y., Abe Y., et al. Local extension of pancreatic carcinoma: assessment with thin-section helical CT versus with breath-hold fast MR imaging-ROC analysis. Radiology 212 (1999) 445-452
11. Trede M., Rumstadt B., Wendl K., et al. Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging improved the staging of pancreatic tumors. Ann Surg 226 (1997) 393-407
12. Grenacher L., Klauss M., Dukic L., et al. Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma: MRI versus multislice-CT-a prospective study. Rofo 176 11 (2004) 1624-1633
13. Erturk S., Ichikawa T., Sou H., et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: MDCT versus MRI in the detection and assessment of locoregional extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30 (2006) 583-590
14. Earls J., Rofsky N., Decorato D., et al. Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 201 (1996) 705-710
15. Fletcher J., Wiersema M., Fidler J., et al. Pancreatic maliganancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 229 (2003) 81-90
16. Lu D., Reber H., Krasny R., Kadell B., and Sayre J. Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels at revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 168 (1997) 1439-1443
17. Hough T., Raptopoulos V., Siewert B., and Matthews J. Teardrop superior mesenteric vein: CT sign for unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas. Am J Roentgenol 173 (1999) 1509-1512
18. Phoa S., Reeders J., Stoker J., Rauws E., Gouma D., and Lameris J. CT criteria for venous invasion in patients with pancreatic head carcinoma. Br J Radiol 73 (2000) 1159-1164
19. Vargas R., Nino-Murcia M., Trueblood W., and Jeffrey Jr. R. MDCT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: prediction of vascular invasion and respectability using a multiphasic technique with curved planar reformations. Am J Roentgenol 182 (2004) 419-425
20. Davies M., and Fleiss J. Measuring agreement for multinomial data. Biometrics 38 (1982) 1047-1051
21. Bipat S., Phoa S., van Delden O., et al. Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and determining resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma a meta-analysis. J comput Assist Tomogr 29 (2005) 438-445
22. Arslan A., Buanes T., and Geitung J. Pancreatic carcinoma: MR, MR angiography and dynamic helical CT in the evaluation of vascular invasion. Eur J Radiol 38 (2001) 151-159