Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Preoperative assessment with helical CT versus dynamic MR imaging

Radiology

Volumn 202, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 655-662

  Ichikawa, Tomoaki ^a   Haradome, Hiroki ^b   Hachiya, Junichi ^b   Nitatori, Toshiaki ^b   Ohtomo, Kuni ^c   Kinoshita, Toru ^a   Araki, Tsutomu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YAMANASHI   (Japan)

^b KYORIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies; Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies; Pancreas, CT; Pancreas, MR; Pancreas, neoplasms

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INVASION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DUODENUM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREAS DUCT; PORTAL VEIN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031056875     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.202.3.9051012     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Warshaw AL, Gu ZY, Wittenberg J, Waltman AC. Preoperative staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 1990; 125:230-233.
2. Freeny PC, Marks WM, Ryan JA, Traverso LW. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT. Radiology 1988; 166:125-133.
3. Freeny PC. Radiologic diagnosis and staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Radiol Clin North Am 1989; 7:121-128.
4. Freeny PC, Traverso LW, Ryan JA. Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with dynamic computed tomography. Am J Surg 1993; 165:600-606.
5. Fuhrman GM, Charnsangavej C, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Thin-section contrast-enhanced computed tomography accurately predicts the resectability of malignant pancreatic neoplasms. Am J Surg 1994; 167: 104-113.
6. Hommeyer SC, Freeny PC, Crabo LG. Carcinoma of the head of the pancreas: evaluation of the pancreaticoduodenal veins with dynamic CT - potential for improved accuracy in staging. Radiology 1995; 196:233-238.
7. Megibow AJ. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: designing the examination to evaluate the clinical questions. Radiology 1992; 183:297-303.
8. Megibow AJ, Zhou XH, Rotterdam H, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability -report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 1995; 195:327-332.
9. Muller MF, Meyerberger C, Bertschinger P, Schaer R, Marincek B. Pancreatic tumors: evaluation with endoscopic US, CT, and MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 190:745-751.
10. Sironi S, De Cobelli F, Zerbi A, Balzano G, Di Carlo V, Del Maschio A. Pancreatic carcinoma: MR assessment of tumor invasion of the peripancreatic vessels. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995; 19:739-744.
11. Dupuy DE, Costell P, Ecker CP. Spiral CT of the pancreas. Radiology 1992; 183:815-818.
12. Zeiss J, Coombs RJ, Bielke D. CT presentation and staging accuracy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Int J Pancreatol 1990; 7:49-53.
13. Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, et al. Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 197:381-385.
14. Engelholm E, de Toeuf J, Zalcman M, et al. Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance in cancer of the pancreas: comparison with cholangiopancreatography. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1987; 50:195-210.
15. Steiner E, Stark DD, Hahn PR, et al. Imaging of pancreatic neoplasms: comparison of MR and CT. AJR 1989; 152:487-491.
16. Vallet AD, Romano W, Bach DB, Passi RB, Taves DH, Munk PL. Adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic ducts: comparative evaluation with CT and MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1992; 183:87-95.
17. Semelka RC, Kroeker MA, Shoenut JP, Kroeker R, Yaffe CS, Micflikier AB. Pancreatic disease: prospective comparison of CT, ERCP, and 1.5-T MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression. Radiology 1991; 181:785-791.
18. Gabata T, Matsui O, Kadoya M, et al. Small pancreatic adenocarcinomas: efficacy of MR imaging with fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement. Radiology 1994; 193:683-688.
19. Dwyer AJ. Matchmaking and McNemar in the comparison of diagnostic modalities (editorial). Radiology 1991; 178:328-330.
20. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 1981; 212-236.
21. Semelka RC, Chew W, Hricak H, Tomei E, Higgins CB. Fat-saturation MR imaging of the abdomen. AJR 1990; 155:1111-1116.
22. Mitchell DG, Vinitski S, Saponaro S, et al. Liver and pancreas: improved spin-echo T1 contrast by shorter echo time and fat suppression at 1.5 T. Radiology 1991; 178: 67-71.
23. Chan TW, Listerud J, Kressel HY. Combined chemical-shift and phase-selective imaging for fat suppression: theory and clinical experience. Radiology 1991; 181: 41-47.
24. Semelka RC, Shoenut JP, Patrick BS, Kroeker MA, Micflikier AB. Chronic pancreatitis: MR imaging features before and after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. JMRI 1993; 3:79-82.
25. Campeau NG, Johnson CD, Felmlee JP, et al. MR imaging of the abdomen with a phased-array multicoil: prospective clinical evaluation. Radiology 1995; 195:769-776.