Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma: MRI versus multislice-CT - A prospective study;Hochauflösende bildgebung beim pankreaskarzinom: Prospektiver vergleich von MRT und 4-zeilen-spiral-CT

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 176, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1624-1633

  Grenacher, Lars ^a   Klauss M ^a   Dukic, L ^c   Delorme, S ^c   Knaebel, H P ^b   Dux M ^a   Kauczor, H U ^c   Buchler M W ^b   Kauffmann, G W ^a   Richter, G M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Comparison study; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance; Pancreas, neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PANCREAS CARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; CYSTADENOMA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATITIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 8444222783     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813642     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Wagner M, Dikopoulos N, Kulli C et al. Standard surgical treatment in pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 1999; 10 (Suppl): 247-251
2. Satake K, Nishiwaki H, Yokomatsu H et al. Surgical curability and prognosis for standard versus extended resection for T1 carcinoma of the pancreas. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1997; 175: 259-265
3. Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg 1990; 211: 447-458
4. Bluemke DA, Fishman EK. CT and MR evaluation of pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 1998; 7: 103-124
5. Sheridan MB, Ward J, Guthrie JA et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of suspected pancreatic cancer: a comparative study with receiver operating characteristic analysis. AJR 1999; 173: 583-590
6. Ishiguchi T, Ota T, Naganawa S et al. CT and MR imaging of pancreatic cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterology 2001; 48: 923-927
7. Richter GM, Simon C, Hoffmann V et al. Hydrospiral-CT des Pankreas in der Dünnschichttechnik. Radiologe 1996; 36: 279-286
8. Richter GM, Wunsch C, Schneider B et al. Hydro-CT in der Detektion und im Staging des Pankreaskarzinoms. Radiologe 1998; 38: 279-286
9. Nishiharu T, Yamashita Y, Abe Yet al. Local extension of pancreatic carcinoma: assessment with thin-section helical CT versus with breath-hold fast MR imaging - ROC analysis. Radiology 1999; 212: 445-452
10. Ferrucci JT. Biliopancreatic malignancy current diagnostic possibilities: an overview. Ann Oncol 1999; 10: 143-144
11. Helmberger T, Holzknecht N, Gauger J et al. MRT des Pankreas: Radiologisch-pathologische Korrelation. Radiologe 1996; 36: 413-418
12. Fin C, Grenacher L, Hansmann HJ et al. Prospektive Studie zum Vergleich der hochauflösenden Computertomographie und Magnetresonanztomographie in der Detektion von Pankreasneoplasien: Verwendung intravenöser und oraler MR-Kontrastierung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001; 173: 724-730
13. Schima W, Függer R, Schober E et al. Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: comparison of Mangafodipir Trisodium-enhanced MR imaging and contrast-enhanced helical hydro-CT. AJR 2002; 179: 717-724
14. Irie H, Honda H, Kaneko K et al. Comparison of helical CT and MR imaging in detecting and staging small pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 1997; 22: 429-433
15. Gaa J, Richter A, Lorenz D et al. Kernspintomographische Diagnostik von Pankreastumoren. Dtsch Ärzteblatt 2001; Heft 7
16. Gaa J, Wendl, K et al. Kombinierter Einsatz von MRT, MRCP und kontrastverstärkter 2-Phasen 3D-MRA in der Diagnostik von Pankreastumoren: Erste klinische Ergebnisse. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1999; 170: 528-533
17. Diehl SJ, Lehmann KJ, Gaa J et al. Wertigkeit der MRT, MRCP und ERCP bei der Diagnose von Pankreastumoren. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1999; 170: 463-469
18. Trede M, Rumstadt B, Wendl K et al. Ultrafast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves the Staging of Pancreatic Tumors. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 393-407
19. Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: preoperative assessment with helical CT versus dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 202: 655-662
20. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Willy series in probability and mathematical statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1981: 212-223
21. Brizi MG, Natale L, Manfredi R et al. Staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with spiral CT and MRI. Rays 2001; 26 (2): 151-159
22. Keogan MT, McDermott VG, Paulson EK et al. Pancreatic malignancy: effect of dual-phase helical CT in tumor detection and vascular opacification. Radiology 1997; 205: 513-518
23. Lu DSK, Reber HA, Krasny RM et al. Local Staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical-CT. AJR 1997; 168: 1439-1443
24. Lehmann KJ, Diehl SJ, Lachmann R et al. Wertigkeit der Doppelspiral-CT bei der präoperativen Diagnostik des Pankreas-Karzinoms - eine prospektive Studie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1998; 168,3: 211-216
25. Fletcher JG, Wiersema MJ, Farrell MA et al. Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2003; 229: 81-90
26. Morakkabati-Spitz N, Willinek WA, Falkenhausen M et al. 1st eine dynamische Untersuchung des Pankreas in der MRT verzichtbar? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002: 433-436
27. Petersein J, Reisinger W, Hamm B. Diagnostische Wertigkeit der sekretingestützten dynamischen MR-Pankreatikographie (S-MRP). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002: 437-443
28. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Mueller PR et al. State-of-the-art imaging of pancreatic neoplasms. Br J Radiol 2003; 76: 857-865