Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: MDCT versus MRI in the detection and assessment of locoregional extension

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 583-590

  Mehmet Erturk, Sukru ^a   Ichikawa, Tomoaki ^b   Sou, Hironobu ^b   Saitou, Ryo ^b   Tsukamoto, Tatsuaki ^b   Motosugi, Utarou ^b   Araki, Tsutomu ^b  

^a SISLI ETFAL TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YAMANASHI   (Japan)

Author keywords

mdct; mri; Pancreatic adnocarcinoma

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETISM; RESONANCE;

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MDCT; MRI; MULTI-ROW DETECTORS; PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREATIC ADNOCARCINOMA; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS; TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KAPPA STATISTICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 33746238706     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200607000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Imbriaco M, Megibow AJ, Camera L, et al. Dual-phase versus single-phase helical CT to detect and assess resectability of pancreatic carcinoma. AJR. 2002;178:1473-1479.
2. Soriano A, Castells A, Ayuso C, et al. Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:492-501.
3. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures. Atlanta, GA: American cancer Society; 2002.
4. DeWitt J, Devereaux B, Chriswell M, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:753-763.
5. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226:248-257.
6. Connolly MM, Dawson PJ, Michelassi F, et al. Survival in 1001 patients with carcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg. 1987;206:366-373.
7. Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg. 1990;211:447-458.
8. Rosenberg JM, Welch JP, Macaulay WP. Cancer of the head of the pancreas: an institutional review with emphasis on surgical therapy. J Surg Oncol. 1985;28:217-221.
9. Johnson PT, Outwater EK. Pancreatic carcinoma versus chronic pancreatitis: dynamic MR imaging. Radiology. 1999;212:213-218.
10. Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Cantisani V, et al. Usual and unusual causes of extrahepatic cholestasis: assessment with magnetic resonance cholangiography and fast MRI. Abdom Imaging. 2004;29:87-99.
11. Lopez Hanninen E, Amthauer H, Hosten N, et al. Prospective evaluation of pancreatic tumors: accuracy of MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR angiography. Radiology. 2002;224:34-41.
12. Sheridan MB, Ward J, Guthrie JA, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of suspected pancreatic cancer: a comparative study with receiver operating characteristic analysis. AJR. 1999;173:583-590.
13. Sironi S, De Cobelli F, Zerbi A, et al. Pancreatic carcinoma: MR assessment of tumor invasion of the peripancreatic vessels. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19:739-744.
14. Spencer JA, Ward J, Guthrie JA, et al. Assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: technique, surgical correlation and patient outcome. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:23-29.
15. Irie H, Honda H, Kaneko K, et al. Comparison of helical CT and MR imaging in detecting and staging small pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging. 1997;22:429-433.
16. Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: preoperative assessment with helical CT versus dynamic MR imaging. Radiology. 1997;202:655-662.
17. Schima W, Fugger R, Schober E, et al. Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: comparison of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging and contrast-enhanced helical hydro-CT. AJR. 2002; 179:717-724.
18. Megibow AJ, Zhou XH, Rotterdam H, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability - report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology. 1995; 195:327-332.
19. Trede M, Rumstadt B, Wendl K, et al. Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging improves the staging of pancreatic tumors. Ann Surg. 1997;226:393-405.
20. Nishiharu T, Yamashita Y, Abe Y, et al. Local extension of pancreatic carcinoma: assessment with thin-section helical CT versus with breath-hold fast MR imaging - ROC analysis. Radiology. 1999;212:445-452.
21. Keogan MT, McDermott VG, Paulson EK, et al. Pancreatic malignancy: effect of dual-phase helical CT in tumor detection and vascular opacification. Radiology. 1997;205:513-518.
22. Freeny PC, Traverso LW, Ryan JA. Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with dynamic computed tomography. Am J Surg. 1993;165:600-606.
23. Roche CJ, Hughes ML, Garvey CJ, et al. CT and pathologic assessment of prospective nodal staging in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. AJR. 2003;180:475-480.
24. Imbriaco M, Megibow AJ, Ragozzino A, et al. Value of the single phase technique in MDCT assessment of pancreatic tumors. AJR. 2005;184:1111-1117.
25. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 1981:212-236.
26. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol. 1989;24:234-245.
27. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-845.
28. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. ROC rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and cases with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol. 1992;27:723-731.
29. Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJ, et al. Fecal incontinence: endoanal US versus endoanal MR imaging. Radiology. 1999;212:453-458.
30. Puglisi F, Zuiani C, Bazzocchi M, et al. Role of mammography, ultrasound and large core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of papillary breast lesions. Oncology. 2003;65:311-315.
31. Catalano C, Laghi A, Fraioli F, et al. Pancreatic carcinoma: the role of high-resolution multislice spiral CT in the diagnosis and assessment of resectability. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:149-156.
32. Arslan A, Buanes T, Geitung JT. Pancreatic carcinoma: MR, MR angiography and dynamic helical CT in the evaluation of vascular invasion. Eur J Radiol. 2000;38:151-159.
33. Catalano C, Pavone P, Laghi A, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: combination of MR imaging, MR angiography and MR cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis and assessment of resectability. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:428-434.
34. Tabuchi T, Itoh K, Ohshio G, et al. Tumor staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma using early- and late-phase helical CT. AJR. 1999;173:375-380.
35. Lu DS, Vedantham S, Krasny RM, et al. Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures. Radiology. 1996;199:697-701.
36. Horton KM, Fishman EK. Multidetector CT angiography of pancreatic carcinoma: part I, evaluation of arterial involvement. AJR. 2002; 178:827-831.
37. Horton KM, Fishman EK. Multidetector CT angiography of pancreatic carcinoma: part 2, evaluation of venous involvement. AJR. 2002;178:833-836.
38. Vargas R, Nino-Murcia M, Trueblood W, et al. MDCT in Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: prediction of vascular invasion and resectability using a multiphasic technique with curved planar reformations. AJR. 2004;182:419-425.
39. Adamek HE, Albert J, Breer H, et al. Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective controlled study. Lancet. 2000;356:190-193.
40. Gabata T, Matsui O, Kadoya M, et al. Small pancreatic adenocarcinomas: efficacy of MR imaging with fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement. Radiology. 1994;193:683-688.
41. Baek SY, Sheafor DH, Keogan MT, et al. Two-dimensional multiplanar and three-dimensional volume-rendered vascular CT in pancreatic carcinoma: interobserver agreement and comparison with standard helical techniques. AJR. 2001;176:1467-1473.
42. Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, et al. Local staging of pancreatic carcinoma with multi-detector row CT: use of curved planar reformations initial experience. Radiology. 2002;225:759-765.
43. Ramsay D, Marshall M, Song S, et al. Identification and staging of pancreatic tumours using computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound and mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Australas Radiol. 2004;48:154-161.