Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 191-200

  Kubo, Shisei ^a   Yokota, Hiroaki ^b   Yokota, Haruka ^b   Hayashi, Yoshihiko ^c  

^a NAGASAKI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b Clover Dental Clinic   (Japan)

^c Division of Cariology   (Japan)

Author keywords

All in one; Flowable resin composite; Hybrid resin composite; Non carious cervical lesions; Randomized controlled trial

Indexed keywords

CLEARFIL AP X; CLEARFIL AP-X; CLEARFIL FLOW FX; CLEARFIL S3 BOND; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADULT; AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH WEAR;

EID: 76349093832     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lee W.C., and Eakle W.S. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 52 (1984) 374-380
2. Heymann H.O., Sturdevant J.R., Bayne S., Wilder A.D., Sluder T.B., and Brunson W.D. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. Journal of the American Dental Association 122 (1991) 41-47
3. Van Meerbeek B., Braem M., Lambrechts P., and Vanherle G. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 70 (1993) 308-314
4. Bayne S.C., Thompson J.Y., Swift Jr. E.J., Stamatiades P., and Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. Journal of the American Dental Association 129 (1998) 567-577
5. Browning W.D., Brackett W.W., and Gilpatrick R.O. Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious class V lesions. Operative Dentistry 25 (2000) 46-50
6. Peumans M., De Munck J., Van Landuyt K.L., Kanumilli P., Yoshida Y., Inoue S., et al. Restoring cervical lesions with flexible composites. Dental Materials 23 (2007) 749-754
7. Peumans M., Kanumilli P., De Munck J., Van Landuyt K., Lambrechts P., and Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dental Materials 21 (2005) 864-881
8. Ishikawa A., Shimada Y., Foxton R.M., and Tagami J. Micro-tensile and micro-shear bond strengths of current self-etch adhesives to enamel and dentin. American Journal of Dentistry 20 (2007) 161-166
9. Sidhu S.K., Omata Y., Tanaka T., Koshiro K., Spreafico D., Semeraro S., et al. Bonding characteristics of newly developed all-in-one adhesives. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 80 (2007) 297-303
10. Knobloch L.A., Gailey D., Azer S., Johnston W.M., Clelland N., and Kerby R.E. Bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesive systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 97 (2007) 216-222
11. Kurokawa H., Miyazaki M., Takamizawa T., Rikuta A., Tsubota K., and Uekusa S. One-year clinical evaluation of five single-step self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Dental Materials Journal 26 (2007) 14-20
12. Ritter A.V., Heymann H.O., Swift Jr. E.J., Sturdevant J.R., and Wilder Jr. A.D. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis. Operative Dentistry 33 (2008) 7 p. 370-378.7
13. Burrow M.F., and Tyas M.J. A clinical trial comparing two all-in-one adhesive systems used to restore non-carious cervical lesions: results at one year. Australian Dental Journal 53 (2008) 235-238
14. Van Landuyt K.L., Peumans M., Fieuws S., De Munck J., Cardoso M., Ermis R., et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year. Journal of Dentistry 36 (2008) 847-855
15. Kubo S., Yokota H., Yokota H., and Hayashi Y. Two-year clinical evaluation of one-step self-etch systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Journal of Dentistry 37 (2009) 149-155
16. Tyas M.J., and Burrow M.F. Three-year clinical evaluation of one-step in non-carious cervical lesions. American Journal of Dentistry 15 (2002) 309-311
17. Çelik C., Özügnaltay G., and Attar N. Clinical evaluation of flowable resin in non-carious cervical lesions: two year results. Operative Dentistry 32 (2007) 313-321
18. Kubo S., Yokota H., Yokota H., and Hayashi Y. Microleakage of cervical cavities restored with flowable composites. American Journal of Dentistry 17 (2004) 33-37
19. Labella R., Lambrechts P., Van Meerbeek B., and Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dental Materials 15 (1999) 128-137
20. Tay F.R., and Pashley D.H. Water treeing-a potential mechanism for degradation of dentine adhesives. American Journal of Dentistry 16 (2003) 6-12
21. Wang H., Shimada Y., and Tagami J. Shear bond stability of current adhesive systems to enamel. Operative Dentistry 29 (2004) 168-175
22. Torkabadi S., Nakajima M., Ikeda M., Foxton R.M., and Tagami J. Bonding durability of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing one-step adhesives to dentine surrounded by bonded enamel. Journal of Dentistry 36 (2008) 80-86
23. Kemp-Scholte C.M., and Davidson C.L. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 64 (1990) 658-664
24. Versluis A., Douglas W.H., and Sakaguchi R.L. Thermal expansion coefficient of dental composites measured with strain gauges. Dental Materials 12 (1996) 290-294
25. Watanabe T. Effect of filler content on microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations. Evaluation under flexural load cycling and thermal cycling. Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry 43 (2000) 308-317
26. Lohbauer U., Frankenberger R., Krämer N., and Petschelt A. Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 76 (2006) 114-120
27. Kubo S., Yokota H., Yokota H., and Hayashi Y. Effect of low-viscosity resin-based composite on the microleakage of cervical restorations. American Journal of Dentistry 16 (2003) 244-248
28. Irie M., Hatanaka K., Suzuki K., and Watts D.C. Immediate versus water-storage performance of Class V flowable composite restoratives. Dental Materials 22 (2006) 875-883
29. Kubo S., Kawasaki K., Yokota H., and Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Journal of Dentistry 34 (2006) 97-105
30. Peumans M., De Munck J., Van Landuyt K., Lambrechts P., and Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 9 (2007) 7-10
31. Perdigão J., Gomes G., Duarte Jr. S., and Lopes M.M. Enamel Bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacturer. Operative Dentistry 30 (2005) 492-499
32. Kubo S. Study on the mechanism of marginal fracture of the posterior composite resins. Part 1. Relation between cavity wall adhesion of the resins and marginal fracture. Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry 30 (1987) 13-27
33. Furukawa K., Inai N., and Tagami J. The effects of luting resin bond to dentin on the strength of dentin supported by in direct resin composite. Dental Materials 18 (2002) 136-142